vendor bill
AI model and tooling bill
Not sized
Not mentioned this quarter. The call describes teams working with large language models on data and product pages (claim c8) but no longer says the company uses AI to do that work or that it carries a cost; the new 10-K risk factor on AI tools that inform members or employees (claim c11) names no tool or function. Without a statement of use, the prior quarter's ballpark is not carried.
inscrutabledisclosure: not mentioned· motive: exploratory· before LLMs: new
In the prior quarter the CEO said there was a cost to the AI used on product pages, offset by greater sales. This quarter no source repeats it: the product-page work is described as working with the large language models, without AI as the tool, and nothing is said about cost. Selling, general and administrative expenses were , up . The step from a sized reading to none comes from the wording, not from a change shown at the company.
Evidence: 0 quotes, 2 figures, 1 confound, 2 from before coverage
What the company pays for the AI it uses: the AI that enhances product pages for large language models and whatever AI share sits in its software and cloud services. The pharmacy in-stock tools are left out: their work is read as relabelled replenishment forecasting (pharmacy-in-stock-ai), so their cost may be pre-LLM tooling under the AI name. The CEO says there is a cost to that AI, offset by greater sales, and calls the technology spend capital light; no amount, vendor or share is given, and the leading AI companies the company works with on visibility are not named. The bill sits in selling, general and administrative expenses and is not split. No AI capital spending is named, so none is registered.
Why this motive
Carried from the prior quarter; the quarter says nothing about what the company pays for AI, and silence is not evidence about motive.
Before LLMs: new
At the anchor the 10-K described substantial investments in technology and IT transformation projects, inside selling, general and administrative expenses ( for fiscal 2024), named no AI vendor or AI spend, and said some competitors were adopting artificial intelligence faster. A bill for LLM tooling, such as the AI that tunes product pages for large language models, did not exist before LLMs.
“We are currently making substantial investments in technology and IT transformation projects, including maintaining and enhancing our digital resiliency, and failure or delay in these projects could be costly and harmful to our business.”
“Some competitors have greater financial resources and technology capabilities, including the faster adoption of artificial intelligence, better access to merchandise, and greater market penetration than we do.”
Figures
- Selling, general and administrative · 2026-CQ3
- Selling, general and administrative growth, year over year · 2026-CQ3
What else could explain it
- line composition: Technology spend is not reported as a line; it sits inside selling, general and administrative expenses with warehouse payroll, benefits, depreciation and card fees.
By quarter
- Q2 2026described · our inference · exploratory · $619k to $15mn
- Q3 2026not mentioned · inscrutable · exploratory