cost of-revenue
Model and inference bill for merchant-facing AI, the part in cost of subscription solutions
0.31% to 1.3% of the quarter’s revenue
Incremental total: counts in full.
Matched line moved : the whole line, not this channel.
our inferencedisclosure: direction only· motive: product-defensive· before LLMs: new
The 10-Q names AI-related usage inside a increase in cloud and infrastructure costs, which it calls the significant majority of cost of subscription solutions; the ledger reads that level at on the plain majority range. The CFO says most AI cost for merchant use of Sidekick sits here, while Sidekick handled about conversations. At the prior-year ratio to subscription revenue the line would have been , a visible excess of . The size shown is the ledger's own estimate, , for the part in cost of subscription solutions; the remainder of the Sidekick AI cost outside that line is not sized. The counterparty is mixed: model providers for model calls, and the cloud providers whose AI-related usage sits in cloud and infrastructure costs.
Evidence: 4 quotes, 7 figures, 2 confounds, 5 from before coverage
What the company pays to run the AI products merchants use, most of all Sidekick: model calls and the AI-related usage inside cloud and infrastructure costs, which the CFO says sit in subscription solutions gross profit. The channel is the part booked in cost of subscription solutions: the CFO places the vast majority of the Sidekick AI cost there, and the remainder, wherever it sits, is not sized here. The 10-Q names AI-related usage inside the year-over-year increase in cloud and infrastructure costs and never splits it. Merchants pay nothing extra for these products.
Why this motive
Inference cost in cost of revenue with no price change: the CFO says most of the AI cost of Sidekick sits in subscription gross profit and was absorbed with margins held level (claim c4), and agentic and AI features carry no separate pricing (claim c15). Carried from the prior quarter, with the same tell repeated.
Before LLMs: new
At the anchor Sidekick and the Shopify Magic features already existed, but the annual report described cost of subscription solutions ( for FY2024, against subscription revenue of ) as third-party infrastructure, hosting and support and explained its growth by cloud and infrastructure costs without naming AI. No model or token bill was given then.
“For example, Shopify Magic provides a suite of AI-enabled features integrated across the Shopify platform and Sidekick offers merchants an AI-enabled commerce assistant.”
“Shopify does not currently develop its own foundational AI models, rather, we develop ways to incorporate AI-powered tools into select products we offer to merchants, in order to support elements of their business operations as well as into certain of our internal business operations.”
“Cost of subscription solutions consists primarily of third-party infrastructure, hosting costs and other direct costs, an allocation of costs incurred by both the operations and support functions, including personnel-related costs directly associated with subscription solutions such as salaries, benefits and stock-based compensation, processing fees related to billing our merchants, payments for domain registration and amortization of acquired intangible assets.”
“Cost of subscription solutions increased for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the same period in 2023. The increase was due mainly to an increase in cloud and infrastructure costs and increase in payment processing fees on merchant billings.”
“Gross margin for subscription solutions was 81.4% compared to 78.0% in Q1 of 2023. The increase stems from pricing changes on standard plans and, to a lesser extent, continued support and hosting efficiencies.”
Figures
- Increase in cloud and infrastructure costs, which includes AI-related usage, year over year · 2026-CQ2
- Cloud and infrastructure costs within cost of subscription solutions, from the 10-Q's "significant majority" · 2026-CQ2
- Cost of subscription solutions growth, year over year · 2026-CQ2
- Subscription solutions revenue growth, year over year · 2026-CQ2
- Sidekick conversations in the quarter, approximate · 2026-CQ2
- Cost of subscription solutions at the prior-year ratio to subscription revenue · 2026-CQ2
- Cost of subscription solutions above the prior-year ratio to subscription revenue · 2026-CQ2
Reported line it is matched to
Cost of subscription solutions rose , , against subscription revenue growth of ; the 10-Q puts of the increase in cloud and infrastructure costs, which include AI-related usage and are the significant majority of the line.
2026-CQ2: 2025-CQ2:
What else could explain it
- line composition: Cloud and infrastructure costs hold ordinary hosting for the whole platform; the AI part is not split.
- operating leverage: The CFO credits cost efficiencies and support with holding margin level, so the line understates the AI bill by whatever those efficiencies saved.
Quotes
“Cost of subscription solutions increased for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025. The increase was driven by a $37 million increase in cloud and infrastructure costs which includes AI-related usage. Cloud and infrastructure costs remains the significant majority of our cost of subscription solutions.”
“As a reminder, the vast majority of AI costs related to merchant use of Sidekick appear in subscription solutions gross profit. We were able to hold gross margins at a relatively consistent level quarter-over-quarter while Sidekick usage scaled, which reflects some cost efficiencies and support, as well as our ability to continue providing merchants unique AI solutions like Sidekick while diligently managing cost.”
“In the second quarter, daily active merchants using Sidekick were up 3.6x year-on-year, and daily sessions were up 4.8x. It handled nearly 34 million conversations, and it was used to create more than 36,000 custom apps, up from 12,000 in Q1.”
“Actually, what's really cool is we now have a number of distilled models where we take a teacher model, usually a big frontier model, then teach it a specific use case to a smaller model, which results in much faster, less costly, and actually sometimes even better at the narrow task.”
By quarter
- Q1 2026direction only · our inference · product-defensive · $4.2mn to $30mn
- Q2 2026direction only · our inference · product-defensive · $11mn to $48mn