Back to Forecasting
ADMAActive

Will ADMA's days sales outstanding (DSO) remain above 90 days through H1 2026?

Resolves August 15, 2026(128d)
IG: 0.80

Current Prediction

57%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement94%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedApril 9, 2026

Why This Question Matters

DSO trajectory is the single most diagnostic metric for the channel stuffing debate. The Fugazi Filter identified the 87% AR concentration and elevated DSO as the most legitimate concern from the short report. Management promised DSO improvement in 2026 and hired a new CFO focused on working capital. If DSO remains above 90 days for two quarters, it validates the working capital concern and may escalate the ACCOUNTING_INTEGRITY signal from QUESTIONABLE toward PROBLEMATIC. If DSO drops, it supports management's growth narrative.

ACCOUNTING_INTEGRITYREVENUE_DURABILITY

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 52%62%Aggregate: 57%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
58%

The question asks if DSO stays ABOVE 90 days through both Q1 and Q2 2026. Management explicitly promised improvement over the course of 2026 and hired a new CFO focused on working capital. However, structural factors work against rapid DSO improvement: 87% AR concentration from two customers, specialty biologic payment cycles, and the McKesson channel is just ramping. DSO improvement typically lags by 2-3 quarters after management action. The new CFO started recently and working capital optimization takes time to show in reported numbers. Slight lean toward YES (DSO remains elevated).

87% AR from 2 customers creates structural DSO floorNew CFO just starting -- working capital improvements lagMcKesson ramp too early to impact H1 2026 meaningfully
opusRun 2
52%

Management addressing DSO on earnings calls typically signals genuine intent to improve. The specific language about rightsizing of inventory, AR, etc., normalized towards the middle/back part of the year suggests management itself expects H1 to remain elevated. This is essentially management guidance that DSO will not normalize until H2 2026. If management is being honest about the timeline, YES is the expected outcome for H1. The counter-argument is that management may be setting conservative expectations. Near coin-flip, slight lean YES.

Management itself guided normalization in middle/back part of yearDSO guidance may be conservative like revenue guidanceH1 is explicitly before management own improvement timeline
opusRun 3
55%

ADMA DSO issue is structural reflecting customer concentration (BioCare/CuraScript = 87% AR) and specialty biologic payment terms. Even with McKesson onboarding, channel diversification sufficient to move DSO below 90 days requires significant volume shift. The ASCENIV growth trajectory (51% YoY) will continue generating new AR faster than collections normalize. Rapid revenue growth mechanically elevates DSO unless collection speed improves proportionally. I expect DSO remains above 90 in at least Q1, making both quarters above 90 moderately likely.

Rapid revenue growth mechanically elevates DSOCustomer concentration is structural, not easily fixed in 2 quartersASCENIV growth generates AR faster than collections normalize
sonnetRun 1
60%

The 90-day DSO threshold through both Q1 and Q2 is quite likely to be met (DSO stays above 90). Three structural factors: (1) BioCare/CuraScript concentration will not change materially in 6 months, (2) ASCENIV rapid growth generates proportionally more AR, (3) McKesson is too early in ramp to offset. Management own language points to H2 normalization, not H1. The new CFO mandate on working capital optimization is a medium-term initiative, not a quick fix. DSO above 90 through H1 is the base case.

Management guided normalization to H2 2026 not H1Customer concentration unchanged in near-termNew CFO working capital optimization is medium-term
sonnetRun 2
55%

DSO improvement requires either faster collections from existing customers or meaningful channel diversification. Neither is likely to materialize fully in Q1-Q2 2026. BioCare and CuraScript payment terms are presumably contractual and not easily renegotiated in 6 months. McKesson channel is new and will start small. The question resolves YES if BOTH quarters show DSO above 90 -- the AND condition makes this moderately likely since even partial improvement in one quarter might not breach 90. However, there is a chance Q2 shows early improvement given the CFO focus. Slight lean YES.

Payment terms are contractual -- not easily changed in 6 monthsAND condition (both quarters) favors YESQ2 could show early improvement but unlikely below 90
sonnetRun 3
57%

The combination of management own guided timeline (H2 normalization) and the structural nature of the DSO issue makes sustained above-90 through H1 quite probable. The short seller controversy may actually slow any customer payment renegotiations as counterparties gain leverage. ADMA specialty positioning means limited negotiating power on payment terms with major distributors. The AND condition (both quarters) slightly increases probability since one bad quarter is enough for YES. Moderate confidence in YES.

Short seller controversy may reduce ADMA negotiating leverageSpecialty positioning limits payment term flexibilityOne elevated quarter is sufficient for resolution period
haikuRun 1
62%

Structural DSO issues do not resolve in one quarter. Management guided H2 normalization. Customer concentration at 87% AR will not change fast. New CFO just started. Clear lean toward DSO remaining above 90 through H1 2026.

Management guided H2 normalizationStructural customer concentrationNew CFO too early for impact
haikuRun 2
58%

87% AR concentration from two customers creates a structural floor on DSO. McKesson channel too new to help. Revenue growth at 51% for ASCENIV generates more AR faster than collections can improve. Probable that DSO stays above 90 through both quarters.

87% AR concentration is structuralASCENIV growth generates new AR fasterMcKesson too new for H1 impact
haikuRun 3
55%

Management explicitly expects improvement later in 2026. New CFO working capital focus is right but takes time. DSO above 90 through H1 is the expected case based on management own guidance. Some chance of early surprise improvement in Q2 keeps probability moderate rather than high.

Management own timeline supports elevated H1 DSOWorking capital improvements take timeQ2 surprise possible but unlikely below 90

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if DSO calculated from ADMA's 10-Q filings (AR / (Revenue/90)) exceeds 90 days for BOTH Q1 2026 and Q2 2026 reporting periods. Resolves NO if DSO drops below 90 days in either quarter.

Resolution Source

ADMA 10-Q filings for Q1 2026 and Q2 2026

Source Trigger

DSO Trend — Above 90 days for 2 quarters = downgrade

fugazi-filterACCOUNTING_INTEGRITYCRITICAL
View ADMA Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis