Back to Forecasting
ADSKActive

Will Autodesk report Q4 FY2026 non-GAAP operating margin at or above 38%?

Resolves March 31, 2026(33d)
IG: 0.36

Current Prediction

78%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement93%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 21, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Non-GAAP margin trajectory tests whether Autodesk can execute on its 41% target, which is the primary bridge from revenue growth to EPS growth. At ~19x forward PE, the market appears skeptical of the margin expansion story. Q4 FY2026 is particularly informative because it includes early restructuring benefits (1,000 roles cut in January 2026). Achieving 38%+ would demonstrate continued margin expansion from Q3's 38% and signal that the 41% target is achievable, directly challenging the MODEST expectations assessment.

EXPECTATIONS_PRICEDNARRATIVE_REALITY_GAP

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 72%82%Aggregate: 78%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
82%

Q3 FY2026 non-GAAP margin was exactly 38%, establishing the baseline. The pre-announcement of Q4 results above guidance on all key metrics is the strongest signal — it implies margins at or above the guided ~37.5% full-year level, and likely above Q3 given the restructuring tailwind. Q4 is seasonally the strongest quarter with highest revenue, which supports operating leverage. The restructuring charges ($135-160M) are excluded from non-GAAP, but the cost savings from 1,000 fewer employees flow through immediately. The consistent margin expansion trajectory (35% to 36% to 38%) and 41% target provide directional confidence.

Q4 pre-announced above guidance on all key metricsQ3 already at 38% establishing floorRestructuring cost savings flow through non-GAAP while charges are excluded
opusRun 2
78%

The full-year guide of ~37.5% non-GAAP margin was set before the pre-announcement and represents the conservative baseline. With Q3 at 38% and margin expanding each quarter, the trajectory supports Q4 at or above 38%. The pre-announcement changes the calculus materially — management only pre-announces when results meaningfully exceed guidance. The NTM transition reduces reported margin by ~300bps, but this is already reflected in Q3's 38% (vs ~40.5% underlying). The key risk is that full-year math could theoretically allow Q4 below 38% if H1 margins were sufficiently above guide, but the pre-announcement makes this unlikely.

Pre-announcement implies meaningful beat vs conservative guidanceNTM margin headwind already baked into Q3's 38%Full-year math risk offset by pre-announcement signal
opusRun 3
75%

The margin expansion case is strong but I assign some residual risk to quarterly volatility. Full-year guidance of ~37.5% means the average needs to land there or above. If H1 (Q1-Q2) averaged ~37%, then Q3 at 38% and Q4 at ~37.5% would hit the full-year guide. The pre-announcement says 'above guidance' but doesn't specify which metrics — it could emphasize revenue and EPS while margins come in slightly below Q3. The Jan 2026 restructuring happened during Q4 (ending Jan 31), so the cost savings are partial at best for this quarter — the full benefit accrues in FY2027. However, the weight of evidence still strongly favors 38%+.

Restructuring savings partial in Q4 — full benefit in FY2027Pre-announcement may emphasize revenue/EPS over margin specificallyWeight of evidence favors 38%+ despite residual quarterly volatility risk
sonnetRun 1
80%

This is straightforward. Q3 non-GAAP margin was 38%. They pre-announced above guidance. Margin has expanded every quarter. Q4 is seasonally strong. The 38% bar is not a stretch target — it is the already-demonstrated level. The restructuring adds tailwind. The committee found 2/2 agreement on consistent margin expansion trajectory with 41% runway. The only scenario for NO is an unusual revenue mix issue or one-time cost that pushes Q4 below Q3 despite the pre-announcement — low probability.

38% already achieved in Q3 — this is a maintenance test, not a stretchPre-announced above guidance eliminates most downside scenariosCommittee 2/2 agreement on margin expansion trajectory
sonnetRun 2
76%

The pre-announcement is the dominant signal, but I note that 'above guidance on all key metrics' could technically mean revenue, EPS, and billings beat guidance while non-GAAP margin comes in at 37.8% — above the guided ~37.5% but below the 38.0% threshold in this market. The full-year guide of ~37.5% suggests management was targeting something slightly below 38%. Revenue growth at 18% with operating leverage should support margins, but the NTM transition (~300bps headwind) is ongoing. The positive operating leverage confirmed by Revenue Revealer and Gravy Gauge cross-lens signals reinforce the margin expansion case.

Pre-announcement could mean above 37.5% guide but below 38.0% thresholdNTM transition ongoing headwind of ~300bps on reported marginsCross-lens confirmation of positive operating leverage
sonnetRun 3
72%

I'm weighing the full-year math more heavily. If FY2026 full-year non-GAAP margin is guided at ~37.5%, and Q3 was 38%, the prior quarters may have been lower. For Q4 to land at exactly 38%, the full-year would need to come in above ~37.5% — which the pre-announcement suggests. But the Jan 2026 restructuring was executed during Q4 itself (ending Jan 31, 2026), meaning the headcount savings are minimal for this quarter while any transition costs or productivity loss could create drag. The Starboard extraction risk (Black Swan Beacon, 5-10% over 3 years) is background noise for this quarter. Net assessment: more likely than not above 38% but not overwhelming.

Full-year math constrains Q4 margin — guide is ~37.5%Restructuring mid-quarter means minimal Q4 savingsPre-announcement is positive but degree of beat uncertain
haikuRun 1
82%

Clear pattern: margin expanding every period (35% to 36% to 38%). Pre-announced above guidance. Q4 strongest quarter. Restructuring helps non-GAAP. Already at 38% in Q3 — just needs to hold. Strong YES case.

Consistent margin expansion trajectoryPre-announced above guidanceAlready at 38% in Q3 — holding is the base case
haikuRun 2
73%

Full-year guide of ~37.5% is below 38%, creating mathematical risk that Q4 could be slightly below Q3. But pre-announcement offsets this — above guidance means beating ~37.5%. The gap between 37.5% and 38.0% is narrow. Margin expansion trend is clear but not every quarter needs to be at or above the prior quarter. Lean YES with moderate confidence.

Full-year guide below 38% creates mathematical riskPre-announcement offsets guidance-based concernNarrow gap between 37.5% guide and 38.0% threshold
haikuRun 3
79%

Weight of evidence clearly favors YES. Q3 at 38%, pre-announced above guidance, margin expanding consistently, 41% target, restructuring supports non-GAAP. The question is whether Q4 holds Q3 levels — with a pre-announcement above guidance, it most likely does. The NTM headwind is already reflected in Q3.

Pre-announcement is the decisive signal41% target provides directional convictionNTM headwind already in Q3 baseline

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Autodesk reports Q4 FY2026 non-GAAP operating margin at or above 38.0% in the earnings press release or 8-K. Resolves NO if below 38.0%. Uses Autodesk's own non-GAAP operating margin definition (excludes SBC, restructuring charges, amortization of purchased intangibles).

Resolution Source

Autodesk Q4 FY2026 earnings press release or 8-K filing

Source Trigger

Non-GAAP operating margin reaching 40%+

myth-meterEXPECTATIONS_PRICEDMEDIUM
View ADSK Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis