Back to Forecasting
ASANActive

Will the Monday.com-Asana revenue growth rate gap narrow to less than 15 percentage points by Q2 FY2027?

Resolves September 30, 2026(216d)
IG: 0.48

Current Prediction

22%
Likely No
Model Agreement91%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 26, 2026

Why This Question Matters

The Monday.com competitive gap was independently corroborated by both the Moat Mapper and Myth Meter. At 27% vs 11% growth, the current 16pp delta is the strongest quantitative evidence for the CONTESTED classification. Narrowing below 15pp would suggest competitive dynamics are stabilizing, potentially through Monday.com decelerating as it scales or Asana re-accelerating. Widening would provide evidence that moat deterioration may be faster than the 2-4 year estimate.

COMPETITIVE_POSITIONNARRATIVE_REALITY_GAP

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 17%30%Aggregate: 22%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
22%

The gap narrowing to <15pp requires a ~3pp shift from 18pp current run-rate. This could come from Asana accelerating ~3pp (9% to 12%) or Monday.com decelerating ~3pp (27% to 24%) or some combination. Asana's deceleration trajectory is deeply entrenched: 47% to 25% to 19% to 11% to 9% over five periods -- this is gravitational, not cyclical. The enterprise pivot under Rogers is E0-E1 evidence with no demonstrated impact on reported growth yet. Meanwhile, Monday.com at $1.23B growing 27% has defied base-rate deceleration expectations. The $100K+ customer growth at 15% is a positive signal for Asana but represents the enterprise segment, which is slower to convert to reported revenue. Monday.com's multi-product conflation is a real analytical limitation -- work management segment growth could be lower -- but even a 3-4pp discount still leaves a gap above 15pp. The 7-month resolution window is insufficient for a structural acceleration to manifest in reported numbers.

Asana deceleration trajectory is gravitational (47% to 9% over 5 periods)Monday.com sustaining 27% growth at $1.23B defies base-rate deceleration7-month window too short for enterprise pivot to impact reported revenue
opusRun 2
28%

Two independent paths could narrow the gap: Monday.com natural deceleration and Asana stabilization/re-acceleration. Monday.com at $1.23B is approaching the scale where SaaS companies historically begin meaningful deceleration -- the base rate for companies at this revenue level is 18-22% growth, suggesting Monday.com may be 5-9pp above trend. If Monday.com reports even one quarter at 23-24%, combined with Asana stabilizing at 10-11%, the gap drops to 12-14pp. The committee noted Monday.com's total revenue conflates multiple products -- if work management is growing at 22-24% rather than 27%, the true gap is already closer to 13-15pp. Against this, Asana's trajectory shows continued deceleration (9% run rate in FY2026 vs 11% FY2025), and the $100K+ customer growth at 15% has not translated to revenue acceleration. The Moat Mapper's 2-4 year deterioration timeline implies the gap persists in the near term. I weight the Monday.com deceleration path as more likely than Asana acceleration, giving this ~28% probability.

Monday.com approaching historical deceleration band for $1B+ SaaSMulti-product conflation may mean true work management gap is narrowerAsana continues to decelerate -- 9% run rate below 11% FY2025
opusRun 3
18%

The arithmetic is unforgiving. For the gap to narrow below 15pp from the current 18pp run-rate, Asana needs to gain ~3pp of relative growth. The committee established Asana's trajectory as consistently decelerating -- every single measurement period shows lower growth: 47%, 25%, 19%, 11%, 9%. There is zero inflection evidence in reported numbers. The enterprise pivot is E0-E1 evidence that the committee explicitly noted lacks quantitative support. Meanwhile, Monday.com's growth has been remarkably stable in the high-20s despite scale. The resolution requires comparing most recent quarterly earnings by September 2026 -- this means we are looking at Q4 FY2026/Q1 FY2027 for Asana and a similar period for Monday.com. Given Asana's FY2026 is tracking at 9%, achieving 12%+ in Q4 FY2026 or Q1 FY2027 would require a dramatic reversal with no current evidence supporting it. Even if Monday.com moderates to 25%, Asana at 9% yields a 16pp gap -- still above 15pp. I assign lower probability with higher confidence because the mathematical constraints are tight.

Zero inflection evidence in Asana's reported growth trajectoryEven Monday.com deceleration to 25% leaves 16pp gap if Asana stays at 9%Both acceleration and deceleration needed simultaneously for resolution
sonnetRun 1
25%

The numbers tell a clear story: Asana is decelerating and Monday.com is not. For the gap to narrow below 15pp, you need a ~3pp swing in 7 months. The most plausible path is Monday.com decelerating -- at $1.23B, gravity eventually wins. SaaS companies at this scale typically grow 18-22%. If Monday.com drops to 24% and Asana stabilizes at 10%, you get a 14pp gap (YES). But Monday.com has shown no deceleration signals yet, and Asana has shown no stabilization. The multi-product conflation is a real wildcard -- if Monday.com work management segment is only growing 22%, the gap is already near threshold. But this is speculative without segment data. The $100K+ customer growth at 15% is Asana's best data point, but it has not converted to revenue growth acceleration. Probability: below 30% but not negligible given Monday.com scale deceleration risk.

Monday.com scale deceleration is the most likely narrowing mechanismNo current deceleration or stabilization signals from either companyMulti-product conflation creates analytical uncertainty
sonnetRun 2
20%

Asana's growth deceleration is not cyclical -- it is structural. Customer count is contracting as SMB churns, and the enterprise pivot has not produced visible results in revenue. The $100K+ cohort growing 15% is encouraging but insufficient to move the aggregate needle when the broader base is shrinking. Monday.com, by contrast, is executing a platform expansion strategy (CRM, Dev, etc.) that actually supports sustained growth even at scale because they are expanding TAM, not just penetrating existing TAM. The committee's observation that Monday.com total revenue conflates products is important but cuts both ways -- the platform strategy is precisely what sustains high growth. For resolution, both companies would need to report earnings by September 2026. Timing risk: if one company reports late, we use whatever is most recent, which adds noise. But on fundamentals, I see no credible path to <15pp gap without a discontinuous event (major contract win, competitive exit, etc.) that is not in the analysis facts.

Asana deceleration is structural, not cyclical -- customer contractionMonday.com platform expansion strategy sustains growth at scaleNo discontinuous event in sight to reverse trajectory
sonnetRun 3
30%

I am giving slightly more weight to two underappreciated factors. First, the committee explicitly flagged that Monday.com's 27% growth includes CRM, Dev, and other products beyond work management -- the true work management growth rate is unknown and could be materially lower. If work management is growing at 20-22%, the actual competitive gap is already 11-13pp, which would resolve YES even without any change. Second, Monday.com's FY2025 growth rate of 27% may itself be benefiting from platform expansion tailwinds that mask deceleration in the core work management business. The resolution uses total revenue growth, however, so if Monday.com continues to report blended rates, this point is moot. My lower confidence reflects genuine uncertainty about whether the multi-product conflation materially distorts the gap. I assign 30% to account for this analytical blind spot.

Monday.com work management segment growth is unknown -- could be materially lowerResolution uses total revenue, not segmentAnalytical blind spot creates genuine uncertainty beyond pure trend extrapolation
haikuRun 1
22%

Current gap is 18pp on run-rate basis. Asana decelerating consistently. Monday.com sustaining high-20s growth. Need 3pp+ narrowing in 7 months. No evidence of inflection from either side. Base case: gap stays 16-20pp. Small chance Monday.com natural deceleration helps, giving ~22% probability.

18pp current gap requires 3pp narrowingNo inflection evidence from either companyMonday.com deceleration at scale is the only credible narrowing path
haikuRun 2
17%

Asana's growth curve (47% to 9%) shows no bottom. Monday.com at 27% shows no top. Both trends point to widening gap, not narrowing. The $100K+ cohort at 15% is a lagging indicator. Even optimistic scenario (Monday 24%, Asana 10%) yields 14pp -- barely YES. Pessimistic scenario (Monday 27%, Asana 7%) yields 20pp. Probability skews heavily toward NO.

Both trend lines point to widening gapEven optimistic scenario barely resolves YESAsana deceleration shows no floor
haikuRun 3
24%

The multi-product conflation issue noted by the committee is the main reason this is not lower. If Monday.com's work management is growing 22%, gap is already near 13pp threshold. But resolution uses total reported revenue growth, which is blended. Unless Monday.com starts segment reporting, the blended 27% rate is what we compare. At blended rate, gap stays wide. Assigning 24% mostly for Monday.com base-rate deceleration risk.

Multi-product conflation is key uncertaintyResolution uses total revenue, not segmentMonday.com base-rate deceleration risk at $1.23B scale

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if the absolute difference between Monday.com's and Asana's most recently reported YoY revenue growth rates (constant currency preferred, reported rates if CC unavailable) is less than 15.0 percentage points, using the most recent quarterly earnings from each company available by September 30, 2026. Resolves NO if the gap remains at 15pp or wider.

Resolution Source

Monday.com and Asana quarterly earnings press releases (most recent available by September 2026)

Source Trigger

Monday.com vs Asana growth rate delta widens or narrows

moat-mapperCOMPETITIVE_POSITIONMEDIUM-HIGH
View ASAN Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis