Back to Forecasting
ASANActive

Will Asana's RPO YoY growth rate exceed its revenue growth rate in Q1 FY2027?

Resolves June 30, 2026(119d)
IG: 0.36

Current Prediction

82%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement90%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedMarch 2, 2026

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 78%86%Aggregate: 82%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
86%

The Q4 FY2026 data confirmed this pattern decisively: RPO +22% YoY vs revenue +9%. The prior version of this market resolved YES with 84% ensemble probability and excellent calibration (Brier 0.0256). For Q1 FY2027, the structural argument is even stronger — current RPO accelerated to +17% YoY in Q4, and billings also accelerated. Revenue is guided at 8.1-9.2% for Q1 FY2027. Even if RPO growth decelerates from 22% to 15% (significant deceleration), it would still exceed revenue growth by 6-7pp. The only scenario for NO is an unprecedented RPO collapse of 13+ percentage points in a single quarter.

Prior market resolved YES — RPO +22% vs revenue +9%, confirming persistent spreadCurrent RPO accelerated to +17% — near-term revenue visibility strengtheningRevenue guided at 8-9% for Q1; even 15% RPO growth leaves a comfortable margin
opusRun 2
80%

Strong structural case carried over from the prior market, now with Q4 confirmation. However, I'm slightly more cautious for Q1 FY2027 than the prior Q4 prediction. Q4 is the fiscal year-end — large enterprise deals concentrate in Q4, boosting RPO. Q1 is seasonally the weakest quarter for new multi-year commitments. Additionally, the YoY RPO comp gets harder: Q1 FY2026 RPO was likely elevated relative to the pre-enterprise-push trajectory. If Q1 FY2027 sees a seasonal dip in large deal signings while revenue holds at guided levels (8-9%), the spread could narrow. Still, narrowing from 13pp to below zero would require extraordinary circumstances. Setting at 80% — structurally strong but acknowledging Q1 seasonal dynamics.

Q1 is seasonally weakest for enterprise deal signing — may reduce new RPO additionsYoY RPO comp base may be harder in Q1 than Q4 (fiscal year-end deal concentration)13pp spread is too wide for normal seasonal variation to eliminate
opusRun 3
83%

Historical base rate is 100% — RPO growth has exceeded revenue growth in every quarter observed. Q4 FY2026 confirmed the pattern with a 13pp spread (22% vs 9%). The key new data: current RPO (next 12 months) accelerated to +17% YoY, indicating the near-term portion is also growing fast. Enterprise customer count +13% YoY continues to feed the RPO pipeline. For Q1 FY2027, revenue is guided at ~8-9%. RPO would need to decelerate from 22% to below 9% — a collapse of more than 50% of its growth rate in one quarter. Even with Q1 seasonal weakness and a potentially harder comp, this is a tail scenario. The Myth Meter E1 downgrade (contract lengthening concern) is noted but does not change the math: even if RPO is inflated by contract lengthening, it would need to simultaneously reverse course for this market to resolve NO.

100% historical base rate of RPO exceeding revenue growth — strong inertiaCurrent RPO acceleration (+17%) is a leading indicator of continued outperformanceMyth Meter E1 concern is theoretical — RPO would need >50% growth rate collapse to fail
sonnetRun 1
85%

This is essentially the same question as the prior market which resolved YES and was well-calibrated. The structural argument is unchanged: enterprise deals create multi-year RPO commitments that grow faster than the revenue recognition rate. Q4 FY2026 data showed RPO +22%, current RPO +17% (accelerated), revenue +9%. For Q1, revenue is guided at ~8-9%. Even aggressive RPO deceleration scenarios (dropping from 22% to 14-16%) leave RPO well above revenue growth. AI Teammates GA at end of Q1 could drive additional enterprise commitments. The 13pp spread requires an unprecedented single-quarter collapse to close.

Prior market resolved YES with excellent calibration — structural dynamics unchangedAI Teammates GA at end of Q1 may drive incremental enterprise commitments and RPO13pp spread requires unprecedented collapse — even halving RPO growth leaves it above revenue
sonnetRun 2
78%

I want to stress the risks more heavily. First, Q4 is fiscal year-end — it is the strongest quarter for large multi-year deal signing. Q1 is the weakest. RPO is a stock metric (cumulative) not a flow metric, so new bookings have to exceed recognitions and renewals. Second, the slight RPO deceleration (23% → 22%) is directional — if this trend continues, Q1 could see RPO growth at 18-20%. Third, if revenue growth accelerates in Q1 (guidance is 8-9%, but could beat), the gap narrows from both directions. Fourth, the Myth Meter E1 concern about contract lengthening could mean RPO is more volatile around fiscal year-end. Still, even at 18% RPO growth vs 10% revenue growth, YES resolves. Setting at 78% — the most cautious estimate, weighting seasonal risk and slight deceleration trend.

Q4-to-Q1 seasonal transition typically reduces large deal signingsRPO already showing minor deceleration (23% → 22%) — trend could continueRevenue could beat guidance, narrowing the gap from below, but unlikely to close it
sonnetRun 3
82%

The math strongly favors YES. RPO at +22% vs revenue at +9% creates a 13pp gap. For Q1 FY2027: (a) RPO may decelerate modestly to 18-20% on seasonal dynamics, (b) revenue may come in at 8-10% per guidance. Even in the bearish RPO scenario (18%) vs optimistic revenue (10%), the spread is 8pp — still comfortably YES. The only path to NO is a catastrophic enterprise pipeline collapse, which contradicts the +13% enterprise customer growth and accelerating current RPO. The prior market's 0.0256 Brier score validates the ensemble's calibration on this specific question type.

Even bearish RPO (18%) vs optimistic revenue (10%) leaves 8pp spread — still YESPrior market Brier 0.0256 validates calibration on this question typeEnterprise customer growth (+13%) and current RPO acceleration (+17%) support continuation
haikuRun 1
84%

RPO at +22% vs revenue at +9% creates a 13pp spread. Prior market resolved YES. Enterprise momentum intact at +13% customer growth. Current RPO accelerated. Even with Q1 seasonal weakness, spread is too wide to close. Strong YES.

13pp spread too wide to close in one quarterCurrent RPO acceleration confirms forward visibility100% historical base rate of RPO exceeding revenue growth
haikuRun 2
79%

Strong structural case. Q4 confirmed RPO >> revenue growth. Main risk is Q1 seasonal weakness in enterprise deals reducing new RPO. But even with deceleration to ~16-18% RPO growth and ~9% revenue growth, YES still resolves. Setting 79% to account for seasonal uncertainty and slight deceleration trend.

Q1 seasonal weakness may slow RPO growth but not enough to close 13pp gapRPO deceleration trend (23% → 22%) may continue to ~18-20%Revenue guided at 8-9% creates a low bar for RPO to exceed
haikuRun 3
81%

Prior market: 84% ensemble, resolved YES, Brier 0.0256. Current data: RPO +22%, revenue +9%, current RPO accelerated +17%. Enterprise cohort +13%. All structural factors remain in place. Q1 seasonality is the main risk but insufficient to close the gap. Setting 81%.

Prior market validation provides strong calibration anchorCurrent RPO acceleration (+17%) is a positive leading indicatorEnterprise customer momentum (+13% YoY) sustains RPO pipeline

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Asana's total remaining performance obligations (RPO) year-over-year growth percentage exceeds its revenue year-over-year growth percentage for Q1 FY2027 (quarter ended April 30, 2026). Resolves NO if RPO growth equals or falls below revenue growth.

Resolution Source

Asana Q1 FY2027 earnings press release, 10-Q, or earnings call

Source Trigger

RPO growth vs revenue growth spread — enterprise lock-in signal contested between Gravy Gauge (E2) and Myth Meter (E1)

gravy-gaugeREVENUE_DURABILITYMEDIUM
View ASAN Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis