Back to Forecasting
ASANActive

Will Asana report dollar-based net retention rate (NRR) of 97% or higher for Q4 FY2026?

Resolves March 31, 2026(33d)
IG: 0.80

Current Prediction

33%
Likely No
Model Agreement92%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 26, 2026

Why This Question Matters

NRR trajectory is the single most-discussed metric across all four lenses. Three lenses converged that 96% NRR is a structural headwind but not a crisis, and the improving trend (95% to 96%) is the key positive signal. Reaching 97% would represent continued acceleration toward the 100% breakeven threshold and de-escalate REVENUE_DURABILITY from CONDITIONAL. Stalling at 96% or declining would validate concerns that the enterprise pivot is insufficient to offset base contraction.

REVENUE_DURABILITYCOMPETITIVE_POSITION

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 28%40%Aggregate: 33%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
32%

Overall NRR stalled at 96% for two consecutive quarters (Q2 and Q3 FY2026) despite improving fundamentals. NRR is a trailing 4-quarter metric, meaning Q4's reported number still includes Q1 FY2026 (when overall NRR was 95%) in the calculation window. For the trailing metric to reach 97%, Q4 quarter-specific retention would need to be materially above 97% to pull the average up from the 95-96% range of prior quarters. Core NRR at 97% is encouraging but the overall metric includes SMB/mid-market customers where contraction continues. The stall from Q2 to Q3 at 96% despite management claiming 'in-quarter improvement across all cohorts' suggests the trailing calculation is a significant drag.

Trailing 4Q metric includes weaker Q1 FY2026 in windowOverall NRR stalled at 96% for two quarters despite improving fundamentalsSMB/mid-market contraction continues dragging overall metric
opusRun 2
38%

The segment-level data provides a more optimistic signal than the overall stall suggests. Core customer NRR ($5K+) reached 97% in Q3, and $100K+ NRR improved from 95% to 96%. The $100K+ cohort is growing 15% YoY, which means its weight in the overall NRR calculation is increasing each quarter. The CFO's commentary about 'successfully renewed several large tech companies' and '$50K-$100K cohort saw exceptional strength' suggests Q4 may have had strong enterprise renewals. However, the committee flagged that NRR decomposition is unknown — we cannot distinguish customer loss from spend reduction. If SMB churn accelerated in Q4 due to the 'evolving search landscape' headwind, it could offset enterprise improvement.

Core NRR at 97% and $100K+ improving to 96% show segment momentumGrowing $100K+ cohort weight increases its impact on overall NRRUnknown NRR decomposition (churn vs downsell) is material uncertainty
opusRun 3
35%

Management stated the company is 'at or near the bottom' on NRR, and monthly retention hit a 12-month high. If this inflection is real, one might expect Q4 to show improvement. However, 'at or near the bottom' is consistent with NRR remaining at 96% — it means the decline has stopped, not that recovery has begun. The trailing 4-quarter calculation methodology means even if Q4 quarter-specific retention improved, the overall metric may not reach 97% because the window still captures weaker earlier quarters. Three lenses converged that NRR at 96% is 'a headwind, not a spiral' — this framing supports stabilization (staying at 96%) rather than recovery (reaching 97%).

'At or near the bottom' suggests stabilization not recoveryTrailing 4Q methodology limits speed of metric improvementThree-lens convergence supports 96% stabilization thesis
sonnetRun 1
30%

The data is clear: overall NRR has been 96% for two straight quarters. Going from 96% to 97% in one quarter when the metric is a trailing 4-quarter average is a big ask. Core NRR is at 97% but overall is not, meaning the non-core (SMB/mid-market) segment is pulling it down significantly. Monday.com growing 27% vs Asana's 11% suggests competitive pressure is real and likely accelerating churn in overlapping mid-market segments. The Myth Meter classified the NRR crisis as DIVERGING from reality, but stabilization at 96% is very different from recovery to 97%. Probability around 30%.

Two quarters stuck at 96% — momentum insufficient for 97%Monday.com competitive pressure in mid-market segmentTrailing 4Q average structurally resists rapid improvement
sonnetRun 2
40%

Several positive signals deserve more weight than the bearish case acknowledges. Monthly customer retention at a 12-month high is a leading indicator — trailing NRR lags monthly dynamics. Core NRR hitting 97% in Q3 means the majority of revenue-weighted customers are at the threshold. The CFO's specific mention of 'exceptional strength' in the $50K-$100K cohort and successful renewals with large tech companies suggests Q4 may have been the strongest quarter for enterprise retention. RPO at $500.9M (+23% YoY) with 77-81% current provides a floor. If the enterprise improvement Q3 showed continued into Q4, the weighting effect could push overall to 97%. But the stall at 96% for two quarters is hard to dismiss.

Monthly retention at 12-month high is a leading indicatorCore NRR at 97% means majority of revenue at thresholdEnterprise cohort growing and improving could shift the weighting
sonnetRun 3
33%

NRR went 95% -> 96% -> 96% over three quarters. The improvement rate is decelerating — 1pp gain in Q2, then 0pp in Q3. For Q4 to report 97%, the improvement rate would need to re-accelerate. While the committee notes improving trends within the quarter, the actual reported number stalled. The trailing metric mechanics mean even an excellent Q4 quarter-specific cohort performance gets averaged with the 95-96% earlier quarters. Additionally, Asana typically reports NRR rounded to the nearest whole percentage point — so 97% means at least 96.50%. Getting from 96.XX% to 96.50% is not impossible but requires meaningful acceleration in a single quarter. Roughly 1 in 3 probability.

NRR improvement decelerated from +1pp to +0pp97% requires at least 96.50% — a meaningful jump from current levelTrailing metric averaging limits single-quarter impact
haikuRun 1
28%

NRR stuck at 96% for two quarters. Core NRR at 97% but overall lagging due to SMB drag. Trailing 4-quarter metric resists quick jumps. Monday.com competitive pressure real. More likely NRR stays at 96% than jumps to 97%.

96% for two consecutive quarters signals plateauSMB contraction offsetting enterprise gainsTrailing metric mechanics favor stasis
haikuRun 2
35%

Core NRR already at 97% is the strongest bull signal — means the revenue-weighted majority of customers are at threshold. Monthly retention at 12-month high is a genuine leading indicator. But overall metric still at 96% after two quarters of these positive dynamics, suggesting SMB drag is substantial. Lean toward NO but not with high conviction given the positive segment trends.

Core NRR at 97% — majority of revenue at thresholdMonthly retention at 12-month highOverall metric stalled despite positive segment trends
haikuRun 3
30%

The gap between core NRR (97%) and overall NRR (96%) shows SMB/mid-market is a material drag. Two quarters at 96% despite improving enterprise dynamics means the drag is persistent. Management says 'at or near bottom' which is consistent with 96% continuing, not 97%. Resolution at 96% most likely.

Core vs overall NRR gap reveals persistent SMB dragTwo quarters at 96% despite improving enterpriseManagement framing consistent with stabilization not recovery

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Asana discloses dollar-based net retention rate of 97% or higher for the quarter ended January 31, 2026, as reported in the Q4 FY2026 earnings press release, earnings call, or 10-K filing. Resolves NO if NRR is reported below 97%, or if Asana discontinues NRR disclosure (resolves NO by default).

Resolution Source

Asana Q4 FY2026 earnings press release, earnings call transcript, or 10-K filing (SEC EDGAR)

Source Trigger

NRR trajectory — recovery above 100% would de-escalate; drop below 93% would escalate

gravy-gaugeREVENUE_DURABILITYHIGH
View ASAN Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis