Archived research. Equity forecasting is part of the Runchey Research archive (methodology era 1) and is no longer actively updated. Everything remains published at its original URL. Browse the archive

Back to Forecasting
BROActive

Will Brown & Brown report FY2026 adjusted EBITDAC margin at or above 32%?

Resolves February 28, 2027(215d)
IG: 0.48

Current Prediction

84%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement96%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedApril 25, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Tests whether the new long-term margin target (32-37%, raised from 30-35%) is achievable in Year 1 of Accession integration. FY25 was 35.9% but had favorable mix; 2026 faces investment income reversal, integration costs, and pricing pressure. Landing at/above 32% validates the new framework; below it signals integration costs exceeding management's framing.

CAPITAL_DEPLOYMENTSTRESS_RESILIENCE

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 80%87%Aggregate: 84%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
85%

Starting from FY25 35.9%, the company would need to compress 390+ bps to fall below 32%. Investment income reversal headwind is roughly $30-60M (40-80 bps margin impact on $5.9B base assuming continued growth). Accession integration costs net of $30-40M synergies — potentially flat to modest negative. CAT property pricing pressure on Specialty Distribution mix — 30-50 bps impact. Cumulative expected compression: 100-200 bps, leaving FY26 at 33.9-34.9%. The 32% threshold has substantial cushion. Probability of clearing is high.

FY25 35.9% provides 390+ bps cushion to 32% thresholdExpected compression 100-200 bps from converging headwindsMgmt explicit guide of 32-37% post-Accession
opusRun 2
83%

Tail risk scenarios that breach 32%: (1) investment income reversal larger than $60M, (2) Accession integration costs front-loaded creating $50M+ one-time charge, (3) Specialty Distribution revenue compression 5-10% with margin de-leveraging, (4) compensation cost increases from leadership transitions. Combining these scenarios with probabilities suggests ~15% tail risk. Mgmt has explicit guide and strong cost discipline track record. Probability ~83%.

Tail risk scenarios combined ~15%Mgmt explicit 32-37% guideStrong cost discipline track record
opusRun 3
87%

Adjusted EBITDAC definition in BRO disclosure typically excludes integration costs and one-time charges, which protects the metric from front-loaded integration drag. The denominator effect (revenue growth) provides operating leverage even with modest organic. The 32% threshold is the floor of the new long-term range — mgmt would not have raised target without conviction. Investment income reversal is the largest specific headwind but is well-quantified by mgmt. Probability of clearing 32%: ~87%.

Adjusted EBITDAC excludes integration / one-time chargesOperating leverage even with modest organic32% is floor of explicit guide range
sonnetRun 1
84%

FY25 baseline is 35.9% adjusted EBITDAC. Key 2026 headwinds: investment income reversal (~50-100 bps), Accession integration costs / synergy timing (-30 bps net), Specialty Distribution mix shift (-30-50 bps). Expected FY26 range: 33.5-35.0%. The 32% threshold has substantial cushion. Probability ~84%.

Expected FY26 range 33.5-35.0%Cumulative headwinds ~100-180 bpsSubstantial cushion above 32%
sonnetRun 2
80%

Slightly more cautious — tail risk scenarios are real. Investment income reversal could be larger than expected ($60-80M). Accession integration may have unexpected dilution if Quintes-style margin seasonality persists. Howden litigation reserve. Multiple converging headwinds plus revenue growth deceleration could compound. ~20% tail risk.

Investment income reversal larger than expectedQuintes margin seasonality persistsMultiple converging headwinds compound
sonnetRun 3
85%

Mgmt has 16-year track record of margin discipline. Adjusted EBITDAC adjustments protect against integration drag. The 32% floor of the new range was set with conviction post-Accession. Even worst-case headwind combination leaves FY26 in 33-34% range. Probability ~85%.

16-year margin discipline track recordAdjustment definition protects against integration dragWorst case still 33-34% range
haikuRun 1
82%

Strong probability of clearing 32%. FY25 35.9% provides substantial cushion. Expected compression 100-200 bps from headwinds. Tail risk ~18%.

FY25 35.9% provides cushionExpected compression 100-200 bpsMgmt explicit guide range
haikuRun 2
85%

Mgmt's explicit 32-37% guide post-Accession reflects high conviction. FY25 baseline gives ~390 bps cushion to threshold. Tail risk scenarios combined ~15%.

Mgmt explicit guideSubstantial cushion from FY25Combined tail risk ~15%
haikuRun 3
83%

Probability ~83%. Mgmt cost discipline + adjusted EBITDAC definition + cushion above threshold. Multiple converging headwinds extend tail but base case lands well above 32%.

Mgmt cost disciplineAdjusted definition protectionsBase case well above 32%

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Brown & Brown's reported FY2026 adjusted EBITDAC margin (consolidated, as disclosed in the FY2026 earnings press release and 10-K) is at or above 32.0%. Resolves NO if it is below 32.0%. Uses the company's standard adjusted EBITDAC definition.

Resolution Source

Brown & Brown FY2026 earnings press release and 10-K filing

Source Trigger

Mgmt raised long-term margin target from 30-35% to 32-37% post-Accession integration. This is an aggressive target that requires Accession synergies to materialize as guided.

consolidation-calibratorCAPITAL_DEPLOYMENTMEDIUM
View BRO Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis