Archived research. Equity forecasting is part of the Runchey Research archive (methodology era 1) and is no longer actively updated. Everything remains published at its original URL. Browse the archive

Back to Forecasting
BROResolved

Will Brown & Brown's Q1 2026 organic revenue growth print above 3.0%?

Resolves May 15, 2026
IG: 0.64
ResolvedEarly Resolution
Outcome: NO
Source: 8-K Item 2.02 / Exhibit 99.1 press release filed 2026-04-27 (accession 000119312526182375)
Resolved: April 29, 2026

Q1 2026 Organic Revenue growth reported at 0.0% (flat) per 8-K Exhibit 99.1 filed 2026-04-27. Organic Revenue $1,348M Q1 2026 vs $1,348M Q1 2025. Organic Revenue with Contingents +2.2% — also below 3.0% under either definition. Result is meaningfully below the 3.0% market threshold; resolves NO.

Prediction Score

Initial Prediction
0.270
Brier Score
Final Prediction
0.270
Brier Score
No updates (single prediction batch)

Final Prediction

52%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement92%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedApril 25, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Near-term cadence check on whether 'modest improvement' over 2.8% is materializing. Q1 typically benefits from softer comparisons (Q1 2025 was 6.5% on softer base; Q4 2025 was -2.8%). A print above 3% validates the cyclical-not-secular framing; a print below 2% confirms the bear case on secular deceleration. Resolves quickly (May 2026), creating an early data point for the rest of the year.

REVENUE_DURABILITYNARRATIVE_REALITY_GAP

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
Actual: NO
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 45%58%Aggregate: 52%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
55%

Two opposing forces: Q1 2025 was 6.5% — a HARD comp at the segment level, but the Q4 2025 -2.8% creates a meaningful sequential setup. Management's 'modest improvement' guide implies 3-3.5% for the full year. Q1 is historically the strongest quarter (renewal cycle), and a 3% threshold sits at the lower end of the implied annual guide. The base rate of beating mid-single-digit guides is moderate; mgmt has been historically conservative. Tilts modestly above 50%.

Q1 historically strongest quarter on renewal cycleHard Q1 2025 comp (6.5%) on segment levelMgmt 'modest improvement' guide implies 3-3.5% — Q1 likely sits in this range
opusRun 2
50%

The 3.0% threshold is right at the boundary of management's implied guide. Q1 has multiple cross-currents: hard segment comp (Q1 2025 6.5%) competing with sequential improvement from Q4 weakness, plus Howden customer attrition continuing (~40 bps drag), CAT property pricing trough still in effect, and investment income headwind beginning. New Retail President transition adds execution risk. Genuine coin-flip — neither side has decisive edge.

Q1 2025 was 6.5% — hard compHowden attrition + CAT property pressure offset sequential improvementRetail President transition execution risk
opusRun 3
58%

BRO management has a 16-year track record of conservative guidance. The 'modest improvement' framing on the Q4 2025 call functioned as a floor, not a target. Q1 is also typically the most conservative-guidance / strongest-actual quarter due to renewal timing. Combined with Q4 2025's anomalously weak -2.8% (which creates a low bar for the trailing-quarter comparison framework), the probability of clearing 3.0% is moderately above coin-flip. Bear case requires Specialty Distribution to deteriorate further AND retail to slip — one or the other is more typical pattern.

16-year management track record of conservative guidanceQ1 typically strongest organic quarterBear case requires multiple segments to disappoint simultaneously
sonnetRun 1
52%

Threshold sits at the boundary of expected range. Mgmt 'modest improvement' implies 3-3.5% full-year; Q1 typically sits at or above the annual average due to renewal cycle dynamics. But Q1 2025's 6.5% creates a hard segment-level comp that constrains the upside. Howden attrition is ~40 bps recurring drag. Casualty rate moderation flowing through commission revenue. Slightly tilted positive but very close to coin-flip.

Threshold near boundary of guide rangeHard Q1 2025 comp (6.5%)Howden + casualty rate drag
sonnetRun 2
48%

The 'modest improvement' guide language is deliberately vague. Mgmt said this in mid-quarter. Reading: Q1 will demonstrate progress over Q4 -2.8% but the year may be back-end loaded as Specialty Distribution recovers in H2. CAT property -15-30% pricing trough and Howden attrition both pressure Q1 specifically. Expected Q1 organic in a 2-3.5% range — 3% threshold is upper boundary. Slightly below coin-flip.

Year back-end loaded — H2 SD recoveryCAT property + Howden specifically pressure Q1Expected range 2-3.5%; 3% is upper boundary
sonnetRun 3
54%

Historical patterns suggest Q1 organic sits at or modestly above full-year. With FY guide implying 3-3.5%, Q1 is most likely in 3-4% range. The 3% threshold thus has decent base rate of being cleared. Counterweights: hard 2025 segment comp; specific 2025 headwinds (CAT, Howden, casualty rate) accumulating into Q1; investment income reversal. Modestly tilted positive.

Q1 organic historically at/above full-year averageFY guide implies 3-3.5%; Q1 likely in this rangeMultiple specific headwinds compress upside
haikuRun 1
50%

Threshold at boundary. Management 'modest improvement' guide implies 3-3.5%. Q1 typically strongest quarter on renewal cycle. But Q1 2025 6.5% creates hard segment comp. Multiple headwinds (CAT property, Howden, casualty moderation) converge into Q1 specifically. Roughly coin-flip.

Mgmt guide implies 3-3.5%Hard Q1 2025 segment compMultiple specific headwinds in Q1
haikuRun 2
45%

Q1 has more headwinds than tailwinds: CAT property pricing trough deepens, Howden attrition continues, casualty rate moderation flows through, investment income headwind begins. Easy comp on consolidated basis (Q4 2025 -2.8%) is not the right reference for Q1 — Q1 2025 was 6.5%. Probability slightly below coin-flip.

More headwinds than tailwinds in Q1Q1 2025 6.5% is the hard compInvestment income headwind begins
haikuRun 3
52%

Mgmt has track record of conservative guidance. 'Modest improvement' likely produces 3.5-4% Q1 due to renewal-cycle dynamics and easy macro setup post-Q4 weakness. 3% threshold sits below the expected actual. Historical pattern suggests modest beat. Slightly above coin-flip.

16-year conservative guidance patternQ1 renewal cycle benefitThreshold below expected Q1 actual

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Brown & Brown's reported Q1 2026 organic revenue growth (as disclosed in the Q1 2026 earnings press release / 10-Q, consolidated organic figure) is above 3.0%. Resolves NO if reported organic growth is at or below 3.0%.

Resolution Source

Brown & Brown Q1 2026 earnings press release and 10-Q filing

Source Trigger

Organic growth Q1 2026: Mgmt guides 'modest improvement' over 2.8%. Threshold: Q1 organic below 2% would confirm bear case on deceleration.

gravy-gaugeREVENUE_DURABILITYHIGH
View BRO Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis