Back to Forecasting
BYNDActive

Will BYND report gross margin above 10% for Q1 2026?

Resolves June 15, 2026(109d)
IG: 0.48

Current Prediction

22%
Likely No
Model Agreement94%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 19, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Gross margin collapse from the 20% target to 6.9% (with Q1 2025 negative at -1.5%) is a central operational finding. The Stress Scanner calculates that breakeven requires gross profit of ~$100M vs. current ~$20-28M annualized. Achieving >10% for Q1 2026 would represent meaningful recovery from the 6.9% 9-month average and suggest restructuring efforts are yielding results. Staying below 10% would confirm the structural cost problem persists independent of revenue level, validating the DESTRUCTIVE capital deployment classification and FAILING operational execution.

OPERATIONAL_EXECUTIONFUNDING_FRAGILITYCAPITAL_DEPLOYMENT

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 18%28%Aggregate: 22%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
28%

Q1 is historically BYND's weakest quarter — Q1 2025 was -1.5%, the worst of 2025 by a wide margin. Q2 and Q3 2025 both exceeded 10% (11.5% and 10.3%), but Q1's low seasonal volumes compress margins most severely under the fixed-cost manufacturing structure. The $5.2M inventory provision was a one-time hit in Q1 2025, and without it underlying Q1 2025 margin was roughly 3-5% — still below 10%. With revenue declining 13-20% YoY, volume continues to work against fixed-cost absorption in Q1.

Q1 seasonal weakness produced -1.5% margin in 2025Fixed-cost manufacturing amplifies low-volume quarter margin compressionEven stripping Q1 2025 inventory provision, underlying margin was ~3-5%
opusRun 2
25%

The committee confirms Q1 seasonal pattern at E2 evidence level with 2/2 analyst agreement. Q2 and Q3 2025 just barely crossed 10% (11.5% and 10.3%), and Q1 volumes are materially lower than mid-year quarters. Manufacturing consolidation from 13 co-packers to 2 internal facilities creates fixed-cost leverage that amplifies margin compression at declining volumes. AlixPartners engagement and transformation efforts may eventually help but are unlikely to produce visible Q1 results within 3-6 months.

Q1 volumes materially lower than mid-year quartersManufacturing consolidation creates fixed-cost leverage amplifying downsideAlixPartners transformation unlikely to show Q1 2026 results
opusRun 3
22%

Sequential deterioration from Q2 to Q3 (11.5% to 10.3%) suggests margin pressure is increasing, not decreasing. For Q1 2026, with further volume declines expected and fixed manufacturing costs, the structural floor for Q1 margins appears well below 10%. The unresolved debate about manufacturing consolidation as 'volume-dependency problem' vs 'fixed cost trap' resolves toward the bearish side for Q1 specifically, when volumes are at their seasonal lowest.

Q2-to-Q3 margin decline (11.5% to 10.3%) shows increasing pressureStructural Q1 margin floor well below 10% at current volumesManufacturing debate resolves bearish for lowest-volume quarter
sonnetRun 1
20%

Q1 is the seasonal trough — last Q1 was negative (-1.5%). Mid-year quarters barely cleared 10%. Revenue is declining 13-20% YoY. Manufacturing is mostly fixed-cost now. The only scenario for YES is if Q4 2025 showed dramatic improvement continuing into Q1, or a one-time benefit like a provision reversal. No lens found evidence supporting margin recovery. The base rate from Q1 2025 and structural decline trajectory make >10% Q1 gross margin unlikely.

Q1 2025 was -1.5% — seasonal trough pattern is strongNo lens produced positive assessment on margin trajectoryOnly path to YES requires multiple favorable assumptions stacking
sonnetRun 2
18%

Q4 2024 to Q1 2025 sequential decline was 14.6 percentage points (13.1% to -1.5%). Even if Q4 2025 comes in around 10-12%, a seasonal decline of 5-8pp would put Q1 2026 at 2-7% — well below 10%. Committee unanimously rates operational execution as FAILING. Trade discounts are increasing as percentage of revenue, compressing margins further. AlixPartners engagement signals management recognizes the problem but transformation takes quarters, not weeks.

Q4-to-Q1 sequential decline was 14.6pp last yearEven moderated seasonal decline puts Q1 2026 at 2-7%Trade discounts increasing as percentage of revenue
sonnetRun 3
23%

Steelmanning the YES case: if Q4 2025 margins surprise to the upside (14-15%) due to early restructuring benefits and reduced China depreciation charges, and Q1 2026 seasonal decline is moderated to 4-5pp instead of last year's 14.6pp, then Q1 2026 could theoretically reach 9-11%. But this requires multiple favorable assumptions stacking simultaneously. More likely scenario: Q4 2025 margins of 10-12% with Q1 seasonal decline producing 3-7% margins. Data vintage note acknowledges Q4 2025 is reporting today but results are not yet available.

YES requires Q4 2025 upside surprise AND moderated seasonal declineMore likely Q1 2026 outcome is 3-7% given structural headwindsQ4 2025 results reporting today could shift trajectory assessment
haikuRun 1
20%

Q1 2025 was -1.5%. Q1 is the weakest quarter. Revenue declining. Fixed costs high. All lenses negative on margin trajectory. Annual average margin is ~7%, and Q1 is structurally below the annual average. Probability of exceeding 10% in the weakest quarter is low.

Q1 2025 was -1.5% gross marginAnnual average ~7%, Q1 structurally below averageAll lenses negative on margin trajectory
haikuRun 2
22%

Q2 (11.5%) and Q3 (10.3%) barely exceeded 10%. Q1 consistently underperforms other quarters. With declining volumes amplifying fixed-cost pressure, Q1 2026 is very unlikely to match mid-year performance. The downward trend from Q2 to Q3 (1.2pp decline) suggests even mid-year quarters are deteriorating.

Mid-year quarters barely cleared 10%, Q1 always underperformsQ2-to-Q3 decline shows margins deteriorating even in better quartersDeclining volumes amplify fixed-cost pressure in Q1
haikuRun 3
18%

Seasonal weakness is the dominant signal. Last Q1 was the only negative margin quarter. COGS per pound regressed higher in 2025. Revenue declining means fewer pounds to absorb fixed costs. No positive catalyst identified by any lens.

Seasonal weakness is the dominant signal for Q1COGS per pound regressed higher in 2025No positive catalyst identified by any analysis lens

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Beyond Meat reports GAAP gross margin (gross profit divided by net revenues) above 10.0% for Q1 2026 (quarter ending March 31, 2026) in its 10-Q filing or earnings release. Resolves NO if Q1 2026 gross margin is 10.0% or below.

Resolution Source

Beyond Meat Q1 2026 10-Q filing (SEC EDGAR), earnings release

Source Trigger

Gross margin return to >15% for two consecutive quarters

roadkill-radarOPERATIONAL_EXECUTIONMEDIUM
View BYND Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis