Back to Forecasting
DKNGActive

Will any major OSB state (NY, NJ, PA, MI, OH) increase gaming tax rates in 2026?

Resolves January 15, 2027(296d)
IG: 0.48

Current Prediction

38%
Likely No
Model Agreement96%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedMarch 23, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Regulatory exposure is simultaneously a moat and a tax — this market tests which direction the balance tilts. Illinois-style tax increases in major states would compress margins directly and undermine the moat thesis. The CEO's argument that prediction markets discourage state tax increases is untested and this market helps assess whether it holds.

REGULATORY_EXPOSUREUNIT_ECONOMICS

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 35%42%Aggregate: 38%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
38%

Illinois established precedent but other major states have not followed yet. NY already at 51% -- limited room. NJ at ~13% and PA at ~36% have room but NJ depends on gaming revenue and is unlikely to increase during competitive expansion. State legislative sessions are slow. The question covers any of 5 states, which increases the probability somewhat. But passing tax increases requires overcoming operator lobbying.

Illinois precedent exists but not yet followedNY already maxed, NJ/PA have room5-state coverage increases probability
opusRun 2
35%

State budget pressures exist but gaming tax increases face lobbying opposition and take time to pass. Most state legislative sessions run Jan-June, and implementation would need to be effective 2026-2027. The question requires enactment in 2026, which is a tight timeline for states that have not yet introduced legislation. Illinois took years of debate before raising rates.

State budget pressures favor increasesLobbying opposition slows processTight 2026 enactment timeline
opusRun 3
40%

Five major states gives 5 chances. PA and OH are the most likely candidates -- both have discussed gaming revenue optimization. CEO argument about prediction markets discouraging increases is untested. On base rates, state tax increases happen regularly across various industries, but specific to OSB the industry is still relatively new and states want to encourage growth before extracting more revenue.

Five states give 5 chancesPA and OH most likely candidatesNew industry dynamic favors growth over extraction
sonnetRun 1
42%

The question is whether ANY of 5 major states increases rates -- wider net increases probability. Illinois precedent is real. State budgets under pressure post-pandemic. However, most states view OSB as a growth industry and are cautious about killing the golden goose. Michigan and Ohio are relatively new OSB states unlikely to increase rates this early. NJ and PA have established industries but face operator resistance.

Wide 5-state netIllinois precedentMost states cautious about new industry
sonnetRun 2
35%

Legislative process is slow. Most states considering increases have not introduced specific bills. Even Illinois took multiple sessions. The 2026 calendar year timeline is tight. More likely we see proposals floated than enacted legislation.

Legislative process slowNo specific bills introduced in target states2026 timeline tight for enactment
sonnetRun 3
38%

Uncertainty is high because state politics are unpredictable. Budget pressures could accelerate timelines. But industry lobbying is strong and OSB revenue is still growing in most states, reducing pressure to increase rates. Low confidence given political uncertainty.

State politics unpredictableBudget pressures real but OSB growingIndustry lobbying is strong
haikuRun 1
35%

Illinois precedent exists but other states moving slowly. 2026 timeline tight for legislative action. Five states give multiple chances but none have introduced specific legislation.

Illinois precedentTight timelineNo specific bills yet
haikuRun 2
40%

Five major states provide breadth. State budget pressures are real. PA and OH are most likely. But operator lobbying and growth-phase industry dynamics work against increases.

Five states provide breadthBudget pressures realGrowth phase discourages increases
haikuRun 3
37%

Base rate for any of 5 states enacting increase in a given year is moderate. Industry is new enough that states prefer growth. Illinois was an outlier. Lean toward NO.

Moderate base rate for 5-state coverageIndustry growth phaseIllinois was outlier

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if any of NY, NJ, PA, MI, or OH enacts legislation increasing online sports betting tax rates effective in 2026 or scheduled for 2027.

Resolution Source

State legislative records, operator 10-Q disclosures, or industry news sources

Source Trigger

Monitor state legislative sessions for gaming tax increases. Illinois-style increases in major states (NY, NJ, PA) would materially impact margins.

regulatory-readerREGULATORY_EXPOSUREHIGH
View DKNG Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis