Back to Forecasting
DOCUActive

Will DocuSign report dollar-based net retention (DNR) at or above 103% by Q2 FY2027?

Resolves September 30, 2026(196d)
IG: 0.64

Current Prediction

52%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement85%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedMarch 18, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Follow-on from the DNR market (resolved NO at 102%). DNR improved for 6 consecutive quarters but plateaued at 102%, missing the 103% moat stability threshold. This market extends the test over 2 more quarters, during which IAM renewal cohorts should begin reaching scale (management's 'small sample' caveat should partially resolve). Crossing 103% would be the strongest quantitative evidence that IAM is driving measurable retention improvement.

REVENUE_DURABILITYCOMPETITIVE_POSITION

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 45%58%Aggregate: 52%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
55%

Base rate extrapolation: DNR improved 1pp/quarter for five consecutive quarters (Q3 FY2025 through Q3 FY2026), then stalled at 102% for two quarters (Q3 and Q4 FY2026). The stall breaks the linear trend. If improvement resumes at even a slower pace (0.5pp/quarter), 103% is reachable by Q2 FY2027. The two-quarter window doubles the probability of catching any given improvement. Historical trend weight favors YES, but the two-quarter stall at 102% indicates a potential structural plateau. Weighting the 5-quarter trend against the 2-quarter stall: ~55%.

5 quarters of 1pp improvement followed by 2-quarter stallTwo-quarter window (Q1+Q2) doubles catch probability0.5pp/quarter pace still sufficient given two-quarter window
opusRun 2
52%

Historical trend decomposition: the 98%→102% move was driven by stabilization of churn post-pandemic and early IAM upsell. The stall at 102% may reflect exhaustion of the first wave of easy wins. A second wave (IAM renewals at scale) could restart improvement, but IAM is only 10.8% of ARR — the 89.2% non-IAM base is structurally flat per CFO. For company-level DNR to move from 102% to 103%, the IAM cohort's above-average DNR must be strong enough to pull the blended average up despite the large flat base. At 10.8% mix, IAM DNR would need to be ~112%+ to pull the blended metric up 1pp. Plausible but not certain. Two-quarter window helps: ~52%.

IAM at 10.8% of ARR — needs ~112% DNR to move blended metric 1ppNon-IAM 89.2% of ARR structurally flatTwo-quarter window provides meaningful optionality
opusRun 3
58%

Trend continuation analysis: companies that show sustained multi-quarter improvement in net retention rarely permanently stall at a single level. The 102% plateau may reflect seasonal reporting noise — Q3 and Q4 FY2026 both at 102% could be coincidental, especially since Q4 is the heaviest renewal quarter and renewal outcomes in Q4 feed into Q1/Q2 reported metrics. The five consecutive quarters of improvement represent a genuine structural shift (IAM, consumption pricing, enterprise expansion). Management guided 'another year of modest improvement' — this language is forward-looking and specific enough to suggest internal data supports continued improvement. Weighting the multi-quarter structural trend more heavily than the 2-quarter stall: ~58%.

Multi-quarter improvement trends rarely permanently stallQ4 heavy renewals feed into Q1/Q2 reported metrics with lagManagement forward guidance specifically cites continued improvement
sonnetRun 1
48%

Management guidance analysis: CFO said 'another year of modest improvement in DNR' for FY2027. 'Modest improvement' from 102% implies 103% is the most likely landing zone for the full year. But management also noted renewals are 'seasonally weighted more heavily to the second half of the year, in particular, Q4.' This seasonal pattern suggests Q1/Q2 may not capture the improvement — it could be back-loaded to Q3/Q4. If management expects 103% by year-end but the path is H2-weighted, Q1/Q2 may still show 102%. The guidance supports improvement happening but timing may miss this market's window: ~48%.

CFO guided 'modest improvement' — consistent with 103% for full yearSeasonal weighting to H2 especially Q4 — Q1/Q2 may not capture improvementGuidance language deliberately hedged on timing
sonnetRun 2
50%

Guidance decomposition: management's use of 'another year' implies FY2027 will deliver similar pace to FY2026 (which improved from 99% to 102% over 4 quarters). If FY2027 delivers a similar 3pp improvement from 102%, that reaches 105% by Q4 FY2027. But FY2026's improvement was front-loaded (Q1-Q3 each +1pp, Q4 stalled). If FY2027 improvement is also front-loaded, Q1 could show 103%. However, CFO explicitly noted H2 renewal weighting. The tension between 'another year of improvement' (bullish for full year) and 'H2 weighted renewals' (bearish for Q1/Q2 timing) creates a near-coin-flip for this market's window: ~50%.

'Another year' implies 3pp improvement possible over full FY2027FY2026 improvement was front-loaded but guidance says H2 weightedTension between full-year trajectory and H1 timing creates genuine uncertainty
sonnetRun 3
45%

Guidance skepticism analysis: management's Q4 earnings call language on IAM retention shifted from Q3's confident 'several percentage points higher than corporate average' to Q4's cautious 'better than company average' and 'very early days.' This tonal downshift suggests IAM retention data may have been less impressive in Q4 than Q3. If the IAM retention signal is weakening rather than strengthening, the mechanism for pushing DNR from 102% to 103% is impaired. Combined with seasonal H2 weighting and the two-quarter stall, the case for Q1/Q2 reaching 103% is slightly below even odds: ~45%.

IAM retention language downshifted from Q3 to Q4 call — possible signal weakeningCFO moved from 'several pp higher' to 'better than average' — lower specificity'Very early days' and 'small sample size' caveats added in Q4
haikuRun 1
53%

Cross-signal analysis: multiple signals converge on continued improvement. $300K+ customers grew 7% YoY (1,165→1,205), indicating healthy large-account expansion that feeds DNR. Envelope consumption at 'near multiyear highs' signals usage-based expansion. New consumption-based pricing launching Q1 FY2027 could incrementally lift DNR as usage-based billing is inherently expansion-oriented. IAM ARR growing from ~$70M to $350M+ shows the expansion engine is real. The question is magnitude and timing. Cross-signal consensus: improvement continues, 103% reachable within 2 quarters but not certain: ~53%.

$300K+ customers growing 7% YoY — healthy large-account expansionEnvelope consumption at multiyear highs — usage expansion signalConsumption-based pricing launching Q1 — inherently expansion-oriented
haikuRun 2
47%

Cross-signal caution: while expansion signals are positive, the stall at 102% occurred despite these same positive signals being present in Q3 and Q4 FY2026. Envelope consumption was already high, IAM was already growing, and $300K+ customers were already expanding — yet DNR couldn't breach 102%. This suggests the positive expansion signals are already priced into the 102% level and incremental improvement requires genuinely new catalysts (IAM at scale, consumption pricing impact). New catalysts take time to show up in reported DNR. The predecessor market (docu-q4-fy26-dnr-above-103) resolved NO despite similar bullish signals: ~47%.

Positive signals already present during 102% stall — already in the basePredecessor market resolved NO despite similar bullish narrativeNew catalysts (consumption pricing, IAM scale) need time to materialize in DNR
haikuRun 3
56%

Cross-signal integration with calibration: the predecessor market resolved NO at 102%, but this market has a critical structural advantage — a two-quarter window vs single quarter, and Q1/Q2 FY2027 benefits from Q4 FY2026 heavy renewal outcomes flowing through. The new IAM SKUs (HR, Procurement) launching in FY2027 create fresh expansion surfaces. IAM is approaching ~18% of total ARR by FY2027 target, up from 10.8% — at this mix, IAM's above-average retention has more mathematical weight on the blended metric. The reporting metric risk is low (resolution criteria accounts for metric changes). Net assessment slightly favoring YES given the two-quarter window and growing IAM mix: ~56%.

Two-quarter window provides meaningful structural advantage over predecessor marketIAM approaching 18% of ARR by FY2027 — more mathematical weight on blended DNRNew IAM SKUs (HR, Procurement) create fresh expansion surfaces

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if DocuSign reports dollar-based net retention (DNR) of 103% or higher for either Q1 FY2027 (quarter ending April 30, 2026) or Q2 FY2027 (quarter ending July 31, 2026) in earnings materials. Resolves NO if DNR remains below 103% in both quarters. If DocuSign discontinues DNR reporting in favor of an ARR-based retention metric, resolves using the nearest equivalent net expansion metric. If no retention metric is disclosed for either quarter, resolves NO.

Resolution Source

DocuSign Q1 and Q2 FY2027 earnings press releases, 8-K filings, or earnings call transcripts

Source Trigger

DNR at 102% in Q4 FY2026 — 6th consecutive improvement but still below 103% moat stability threshold. CFO guided 'another year of modest improvement.' Follow-on test: does DNR reach 103%+ by Q2 FY2027?

gravy-gaugeREVENUE_DURABILITYHIGH
View DOCU Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis