Back to Forecasting
FSLYActive

Will Fastly's security revenue reach 25% or more of total quarterly revenue by Q4 2026?

Resolves February 28, 2027(367d)
IG: 0.36

Current Prediction

18%
Likely No
Model Agreement95%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 12, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Security revenue mix shift is the clearest path from CONDITIONAL to DURABLE revenue durability. Security is subscription-based, growing 32% YoY, and represents higher-quality revenue than usage-based Network Services. At 21% currently with ~2pp annual mix shift, reaching 25% would be an early signal of accelerating structural improvement. Both the Gravy Gauge and Revenue Revealer identified this as a key upgrade trigger. However, the Revenue Revealer noted the pace is 'too slow to materially change revenue structure within 2-3 years,' making this a longer-horizon test of the thesis.

REVENUE_DURABILITY

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 15%22%Aggregate: 18%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
22%

Security revenue at $35.4M (21% of Q4 2025 total $172.6M) growing 32% YoY would reach ~$46.7M by Q4 2026. At guided total revenue growth of ~14%, Q4 2026 total would be ~$196.8M, yielding security mix of ~23.7% -- short of 25%. Reaching 25% requires security growth acceleration to ~39%, which would demand a step-change from API Security completion or bot management breakout. The 'any quarter' clause gives 4 shots but earlier quarters have lower security bases. The committee's ~2pp/year pace assessment is mathematically sound. A tail scenario where Network Services slows (reducing denominator) while security accelerates could get there, but this requires multiple favorable breaks.

Math requires 39% security growth at 14% total growth to reach 25%Current 32% security growth gets to ~23.7% mix -- short of thresholdAPI Security 'halfway through journey' unlikely to contribute materially in 2026
opusRun 2
18%

The Revenue Revealer's ~2pp/year pace assessment is well-grounded: from 21% to 23% by end of 2026, well short of 25%. Even an acceleration to 3pp/year (which would be exceptional given no historical precedent) yields only 24%. The denominator problem is particularly acute for Fastly: FY 2025 actual revenue of $624M beat $575-585M guidance by ~7%. If similar outperformance occurs in FY 2026, total revenue grows faster than guided 14%, pushing the denominator higher and making 25% security mix even harder. API Security is 'about halfway through the journey' per management, suggesting material revenue contribution is an FY 2027+ story. The committee found 2/2 agreement that REVENUE_DURABILITY remains CONDITIONAL precisely because mix shift pace is too slow.

2pp/year pace puts security at 23% by year-end 2026 -- 2pp shortDenominator risk: Fastly beat FY25 guidance by 7%, similar outperformance makes 25% harderAPI Security revenue contribution is an FY2027+ story per management timeline
opusRun 3
20%

Exploring upside scenarios: (1) Security has multiple growth vectors -- WAF, DDoS, Bot Management, API Security -- if one has a breakout quarter, security could spike; (2) If Network Services has a weak quarter (client churn, usage-based volatility), the denominator shrinks and security mix rises; (3) Multi-product adoption at 50% of customers generating 75% of revenue suggests cross-sell into security is active. However, the base case math is firmly against YES. Even under optimistic assumptions (security grows 35%, total grows 10%), security reaches ~24.4% -- still marginally short. The only path to YES requires either a security growth acceleration well above 32% or a meaningful slowdown in total revenue growth, and both scenarios have low base rates. The question resolving YES would genuinely surprise the committee.

Even optimistic scenario (35% security, 10% total) yields only 24.4% mixMultiple security product vectors could surprise but none individually sufficientUsage-based Network Services volatility could reduce denominator in a specific quarter
sonnetRun 1
18%

The math is straightforward: 32% security growth + 14% total growth = ~23.7% security mix by Q4 2026, short of the 25% threshold. To reach 25%, security growth needs to accelerate to ~39% while total growth stays at guidance -- a 7pp acceleration with no identified catalyst. The committee's ~2pp/year mix shift pace assessment directly addresses this question and concluded it would take approximately 2 years to reach 25%. This market is essentially asking whether the committee's timeline is wrong by a factor of 2x. While possible, there is no evidence suggesting such acceleration.

32% security growth + 14% total growth = 23.7% mix, short of 25%Committee's 2pp/year assessment directly answers this question -- needs 4pp in one yearNo identified catalyst for 7pp acceleration in security growth rate
sonnetRun 2
15%

The denominator effect is the underappreciated factor here. Fastly has consistently beaten revenue guidance -- FY 2025 actual $624M vs $575-585M guidance (7% beat). If FY 2026 beats $710M midpoint by a similar margin, total revenue could reach ~$760M, meaning Q4 2026 total could be ~$205M. Even with 35% security growth ($47.8M), the mix would be only 23.3%. The paradox: Fastly executing well on total revenue actually makes this market harder to resolve YES. Security would need to dramatically outpace a company that is already executing above expectations. The Revenue Revealer's characterization of the pace as 'too slow to materially change revenue structure within 2-3 years' appears well-calibrated.

Revenue outperformance paradox: better total execution makes 25% security mix harderAt FY25-level beat rate, Q4 2026 total ~$205M vs $197M, raising the bar furtherRevenue Revealer pace assessment directly applicable and well-calibrated
sonnetRun 3
22%

While the base case math points to NO, I assign slightly higher probability than pure math suggests because of multiple option-value catalysts. Security has four product lines (WAF, DDoS, Bot Management, API Security), and AI-driven traffic growth could disproportionately benefit bot management and API security. The 50% multi-product adoption rate at 75% of revenue suggests active cross-sell motion into security. Also, the question allows ANY quarter -- so even a single quarter where Network Services has usage-based volatility (reducing the denominator) while security has a strong product launch could spike the ratio. However, lower confidence because this upside scenario requires multiple favorable breaks with no specific supporting evidence.

AI traffic growth could disproportionately benefit bot management and API securityFour security product vectors create option value for upside surpriseAny-quarter clause plus usage-based Network Services volatility creates denominator optionality
haikuRun 1
17%

Currently at 21% security mix with ~2pp/year pace. Need 4pp gain in one year to reach 25%. That is double the historical pace with no identified acceleration catalyst. Math clearly favors NO. Security at 32% growth with 14% total growth yields ~23.7% by Q4 2026.

2pp/year pace means 23% by year-end, 2pp short of thresholdNo identified catalyst for doubling the mix shift pace32% security growth insufficient against 14% total growth
haikuRun 2
15%

Security needs to grow ~39% while total grows ~14% to reach 25% mix. Current security growth is 32% -- a 7pp acceleration is needed. Security growth may actually decelerate as the base grows ($125M FY2025 base). Revenue outperformance in FY2025 (beat by 7%) suggests total growth could exceed guidance, raising the bar. Strongly favors NO.

Need 39% security growth, currently at 32% -- 7pp acceleration requiredSecurity growth may decelerate from larger baseFastly's history of beating revenue guidance raises the denominator
haikuRun 3
20%

Multiple security products (WAF, DDoS, Bot, API) provide growth vectors. Multi-product adoption at 50% of customers supports cross-sell. However, base case arithmetic is clear: even at 35% security growth and 10% total growth, mix reaches only 24.4%. Small upside from quarterly volatility in usage-based Network Services, but insufficient for base case YES.

Multiple security products provide growth optionalityEven optimistic math (35% security, 10% total) yields 24.4%Quarterly volatility provides marginal upside but not enough for base case

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Fastly's security revenue segment reaches 25.0% or more of total quarterly revenue in any quarter through Q4 2026 (reported in the 8-K or 10-Q). Resolves NO if security revenue remains below 25% of total revenue in all quarters through Q4 2026.

Resolution Source

Fastly quarterly earnings releases (8-K filings) and 10-Q/10-K filings for Q1 through Q4 2026

Source Trigger

Security revenue reaches 25%+ of total

revenue-revealerREVENUE_DURABILITYMEDIUM
View FSLY Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis