Back to Forecasting
FSLYActive

Will Fastly's LTM net retention rate drop below 105% in any quarter reported by Q3 2026 earnings?

Resolves November 15, 2026(262d)
IG: 0.48

Current Prediction

11%
Likely No
Model Agreement96%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 12, 2026

Why This Question Matters

NRR is the primary composite metric for customer health and expansion dynamics. The improvement from 102% to 110% is a core pillar of the turnaround thesis, but the Revenue Revealer noted gross retention actually declined (99.0% to 98.7%), meaning expansion is masking rising churn. A drop below 105% would trigger a CONDITIONAL to FRAGILE downgrade on REVENUE_DURABILITY per the Gravy Gauge's escalation framework. Sustained NRR above 105% would validate multi-product switching costs as a durable growth mechanism.

REVENUE_DURABILITYCOMPETITIVE_POSITION

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 8%15%Aggregate: 11%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
12%

NRR at 110% is 500bps above the 105% threshold with a strong upward trajectory (102%->106%->110%). For NRR to breach 105%, gross churn would need to roughly double from ~1.3% to ~6%+ while expansion holds, or expansion would need to collapse from ~11.3% to below ~6.3%. Neither is base case over 3 quarters. The usage-based model (76% of revenue) creates vulnerability to macro shocks -- a customer traffic decline of ~5% across the base could compress expansion significantly -- but the declining gross retention (30bps/year) is not accelerating fast enough to threaten 105% absent a shock.

500bps buffer above threshold with accelerating trajectoryUsage-based model (76%) creates macro vulnerability but not imminent threatGross retention decline of 30bps/year too slow to erode buffer in 3 quarters
opusRun 2
10%

NRR is an LTM metric, so Q1 2025 data rolls off and gets replaced by Q1 2026. Even if Q1 2026 is weaker due to seasonal patterns or macro headwinds, the LTM math requires Q1 2026 to be dramatically weaker than Q1 2025 to pull the trailing twelve months below 105%. The 800bps improvement over 4 quarters provides an enormous buffer. The company discontinuing annual retention rate disclosure could suggest they anticipate gross retention deterioration, but they are keeping NRR disclosure, which signals confidence in the headline number staying strong.

LTM rolling math requires dramatic quarter-over-quarter weakness to breach 105%800bps improvement over 4 quarters provides massive bufferCompany keeping NRR disclosure signals management confidence in the metric
opusRun 3
15%

The strongest bear case centers on top customer concentration (34% of revenue, top 10 growing +28%). Loss of a single top-3 customer representing ~5-7% of revenue could mechanically reduce NRR by 300-500bps. Combined with background gross retention decline, this could push NRR toward 105%. However, multi-product switching costs (50% on 2+ products) make sudden churn of a major customer unlikely in a 3-quarter window. The probability of a specific top customer event AND it being severe enough to breach 105% is low but represents the primary non-trivial risk path.

Top customer concentration (34% of revenue) creates single-point-of-failure riskLoss of top-3 customer could mechanically compress NRR by 300-500bpsMulti-product switching costs (50% on 2+ products) make sudden major churn unlikely
sonnetRun 1
11%

NRR at 110% with a 105% threshold means a 500bps buffer on a strong upward trend. Even if the trend flattens entirely, NRR would need to actively reverse course. The gross retention decline of 30bps per year would take years to erode the expansion buffer at current rates. Multi-product adoption (50% on 2+ products generating 75% of revenue) provides structural support for retention. Enterprise customer net adds (+32 YoY) indicate continued land-and-expand execution.

500bps buffer with strong upward momentumGross retention decline rate (30bps/year) far too slow to erode bufferMulti-product adoption provides structural NRR support
sonnetRun 2
8%

The trajectory speaks clearly: 102%->106%->110% over four quarters is acceleration, not deceleration. The momentum is upward, driven by multi-product expansion and enterprise additions (+32 net adds). For NRR to drop 500+ bps in 3 quarters would require a significant negative shock -- major customer loss, macro-driven traffic collapse, or competitive displacement. None of these are signaled in the analysis facts. The gross retention decline is a long-term monitoring concern but not an imminent threat to the 105% level.

NRR trajectory is accelerating (102->106->110), not deceleratingNo negative shock scenarios signaled in current analysis factsEnterprise net adds (+32) indicate continued customer health
sonnetRun 3
13%

The unresolved committee debate about passive vs. deliberate expansion is the key uncertainty. If NRR expansion is primarily traffic-driven rather than product-driven, it is more vulnerable to macro slowdowns. In a recession scenario, usage-based revenue (76%) could compress, expansion could stall, and NRR could drop. But even in that bear scenario, going from 110% to below 105% in 3 quarters is aggressive. A more realistic bear case might see NRR drop to 106-108%, still above the threshold. The probability of a macro shock severe enough to cause a 500+ bps NRR decline within 3 quarters is low.

Passive vs. deliberate expansion debate creates uncertainty about NRR vulnerabilityUsage-based model (76%) adds macro sensitivityEven bear scenarios more likely to produce 106-108% than sub-105%
haikuRun 1
9%

Strong uptrend (102%->106%->110%) with 500bps buffer to threshold. Multi-product adoption at 50% provides switching cost protection. Enterprise net adds positive. Very unlikely to breach 105% in 3 quarters absent a major exogenous shock not currently visible in the data.

Strong NRR uptrend with 500bps bufferMulti-product switching costs protect retentionNo visible shock catalyst in current data
haikuRun 2
10%

NRR accelerating with enterprise customers growing and multi-product adoption at 50%. Gross retention decline is minor at 30bps per year. The 105% threshold is far below current 110% level. Would need unprecedented deterioration to breach in 3 quarters.

NRR accelerating, not deceleratingGross retention decline rate is minor105% threshold far below current level
haikuRun 3
14%

Usage-based model (76% of revenue) creates some macro vulnerability, and top customer concentration (34% of revenue) means one large loss could hurt. But the 500bps buffer and strong trajectory provide substantial protection. Even with pessimistic assumptions, most scenarios keep NRR above 105% over this timeframe.

Usage-based model adds macro vulnerabilityTop customer concentration creates tail risk500bps buffer and strong trajectory provide substantial protection

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Fastly reports LTM net retention rate below 105% in any quarterly earnings release through Q3 2026 (expected October 2026). Resolves NO if NRR remains at or above 105% in all quarters reported through Q3 2026. If Fastly discontinues NRR disclosure, resolves NO (status quo assumption).

Resolution Source

Fastly quarterly earnings releases (8-K filings) for Q1, Q2, and Q3 2026

Source Trigger

NRR drops below 105%

gravy-gaugeREVENUE_DURABILITYMEDIUM
View FSLY Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis