Back to Forecasting
FTAIActive

Will the FTAI securities class action (SDNY) survive a motion to dismiss by December 31, 2026?

Resolves December 31, 2026(289d)
IG: 0.64

Current Prediction

55%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement72%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedMarch 16, 2026

Why This Question Matters

A motion to dismiss ruling would signal whether the securities fraud allegations have legal merit. Dismissal would reduce litigation overhang; denial would amplify it.

REGULATORY_EXPOSUREGOVERNANCE_ALIGNMENT

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 52%60%Aggregate: 55%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
60%

Securities class actions based on short seller reports face a 50-60% survival rate at the motion to dismiss stage. The specific nature of the allegations (named mechanism) and two independent sources strengthen the complaint. However, SDNY timeline for MTD ruling may extend beyond December 2026. 60% the case survives (YES resolution).

50-60% class action survival rateSpecific allegations strengthen complaintSDNY timeline may extend
opusRun 2
55%

The Board's independent review conclusion may support a motion to dismiss. However, the Hagens Berman complaint likely alleges specific scienter elements that survive initial pleading review. The question includes 'no motion filed' as YES, which increases the probability since motions can be delayed. 55%.

Board review supports MTDScienter allegations may surviveNo MTD filed also counts as YES
opusRun 3
58%

Class actions in SDNY have established procedures. MTD is typically filed 6-9 months after complaint. Briefing takes 3-6 months. Ruling takes 3-6 months. From January 2025 filing, MTD ruling by December 2026 is possible but not certain. If no ruling yet, case is still active (YES). 58%.

SDNY procedural timelineMTD briefing scheduleActive case counts as YES
sonnetRun 1
55%

Most securities class actions survive MTD. Two independent reports with the same finding make the complaint stronger. 55% the case survives.

Most survive MTDTwo independent reports strengthen claim
sonnetRun 2
52%

The Board review may provide a strong MTD argument. Revenue classification disputes are fact-intensive and may survive pleading stage to reach discovery. Slightly above coin flip. 52%.

Board review supports MTDFact-intensive claims survive pleading
sonnetRun 3
58%

The 24% stock drop on the Muddy Waters report provides strong loss causation evidence, a key element for surviving MTD. The class period is clearly defined. Strong complaint foundation. 58%.

24% stock drop provides loss causationClear class periodStrong complaint
haikuRun 1
55%

Class actions typically survive MTD. Two short reports strengthen complaint. 55%.

Survival base rateStrengthened complaint
haikuRun 2
52%

Board review may support dismissal but allegations are specific. 52%.

Board review vs specific allegations
haikuRun 3
55%

More likely active than dismissed by year end. 55%.

Likely still active

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if the court denies FTAI's motion to dismiss (or no motion to dismiss has been filed/ruled upon by December 31, 2026, leaving the case active). Resolves NO if the court grants FTAI's motion to dismiss and the case is terminated or substantially narrowed.

Resolution Source

SDNY court docket and FTAI SEC filings

Source Trigger

Class action discovery milestones and motion to dismiss ruling

regulatory-readerREGULATORY_EXPOSUREHIGH
View FTAI Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis