Back to Forecasting
GOOGActive

Will Alphabet's depreciation expense exceed $35B in FY2026?

Resolves February 28, 2027(337d)
IG: 0.60

Current Prediction

70%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement92%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedMarch 27, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Depreciation trajectory is the highest-conviction cross-lens finding. Three lenses independently converged on this as the most important near-term financial dynamic. $35B represents a ~66% increase from FY2025's $21.1B — the midpoint of the projected path to $50-55B by FY2027. Exceeding $35B would confirm the depreciation cliff is materializing on schedule. Staying below $35B could indicate useful life extensions or phased CapEx deployment softening the impact.

CAPITAL_DEPLOYMENTNARRATIVE_REALITY_GAP

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 62%74%Aggregate: 70%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
72%

FY2025 depreciation was $21.1B on a CapEx base that includes prior years' spend plus FY2025's $91.4B. FY2026 adds $175-185B of new CapEx. Even at 6-year useful life, the incremental annual depreciation from FY2026 CapEx alone is ~$29-31B. But assets placed in service throughout FY2026 only generate partial-year depreciation — if evenly deployed, the average FY2026 impact is ~$15B incremental. Add the existing run rate (~$21.1B growing organically to ~$24-25B) and total FY2026 depreciation is approximately $36-40B. This exceeds $35B. The main risk to this estimate is further useful life extension or heavy back-loading of CapEx deployment. Setting at 72%.

Existing base growing from $21.1B to ~$24-25B organicallyFY2026 CapEx of $175-185B adds ~$15B incremental partial-year depreciationTotal ~$36-40B exceeds $35B threshold
opusRun 2
65%

The arithmetic supports exceeding $35B, but two factors could keep it below: (1) Management could extend useful lives from 6 to 7 years, reducing annual depreciation by $5-8B — they have precedent and incentive. (2) CapEx composition matters — if a significant portion goes to land and building construction (15-25 year useful lives), the depreciation ramp is slower. Data centers include both servers (3-6 years) and buildings (20+ years). If 40% of CapEx is building/land, the short-life depreciation increment shrinks. Setting at 65% — more likely above $35B than below, but meaningful uncertainty from useful life and asset mix.

Useful life extension precedent (4→6yr in 2024) could repeatCapEx composition: buildings (20yr) vs servers (6yr) matters significantly65% reflects base case above $35B with meaningful downside scenarios
opusRun 3
68%

Let me work backwards. For FY2026 depreciation to stay at or below $35B: (1) Existing asset base depreciation must not grow beyond ~$25B (requires no acceleration — plausible), (2) FY2026 CapEx incremental depreciation must stay below $10B (requires either heavy back-loading of CapEx or very long useful lives on new assets). $10B incremental means FY2026 CapEx generates only 5.5-5.7% first-year depreciation — below typical patterns for tech infrastructure. Possible if buildings dominate early CapEx, but unlikely given the Cloud infrastructure build imperative. Setting at 68% — the math favors exceeding $35B absent deliberate accounting management.

Below-$35B requires very low first-year depreciation rate on new CapExCloud infrastructure urgency favors fast server deployment, not slow building construction68% reflects arithmetic base case with accounting flexibility uncertainty
sonnetRun 1
70%

The math is straightforward. FY2025 depreciation at $21.1B growing organically at ~15-20% = ~$24-25B base. FY2026 CapEx of $180B (midpoint) at ~8% average first-year depreciation rate = ~$14B incremental. Total: ~$38-39B, well above $35B. Only accounting maneuvers (useful life extension, reclassification) keep it below. Setting at 70%.

Organic base growth: $21.1B → ~$24-25BIncremental from FY2026 CapEx: ~$14BTotal ~$38-39B — above threshold
sonnetRun 2
62%

I give more weight to management's ability to manage depreciation. Google already extended useful lives from 4 to 6 years in 2024 to manage the optics. They could do 6 to 7 years — perfectly defensible given infrastructure improvements. This alone could reduce total by $3-5B. Additionally, CapEx deployment is likely phased: more in H2 than H1 (construction timelines), reducing partial-year depreciation. The company has every incentive to keep depreciation looking manageable while the CapEx ramp continues. Setting at 62% — more likely above than below, but management has tools.

Management has precedent and incentive for useful life extensionCapEx likely phased — more H2 deployment means less H1 depreciation62% reflects management's depreciation management capability
sonnetRun 3
73%

Even with a useful life extension to 7 years, the sheer scale of CapEx nearly doubling makes $35B hard to avoid. The existing PP&E base was already generating $21.1B at accelerating rates (+38% FY2025). The incremental FY2025 CapEx of $91.4B is still depreciating through FY2026 at higher run rates. Plus FY2026's $175-185B. Even aggressive accounting management struggles with these numbers. Setting at 73% — the scale overwhelms the accounting flexibility.

Scale of CapEx increase overwhelms accounting flexibilityFY2025 CapEx ($91.4B) still ramping depreciation into FY202673% reflects arithmetic dominance over management's tools
haikuRun 1
70%

$21.1B base growing organically plus massive CapEx ramp. Math supports exceeding $35B. Main risk is useful life extension. Setting at 70%.

$21.1B base growing +38% paceCapEx nearly doubling adds incremental depreciationUseful life extension only meaningful risk to NO
haikuRun 2
66%

Arithmetic favors exceeding $35B but CapEx deployment timing and useful life management create uncertainty. Likely above $35B but not certain. Setting at 66%.

Arithmetic favors YESDeployment timing adds uncertaintyUseful life management possible
haikuRun 3
74%

The $35B threshold is conservative given the CapEx trajectory. Existing depreciation at $21.1B and growing fast, plus massive new CapEx. Even with phased deployment and possible useful life extension, $35B+ is more likely than not. Setting at 74%.

$35B is conservative thresholdExisting base plus CapEx incrementMore likely than not to exceed

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Alphabet's FY2026 depreciation and amortization expense (as reported in the 10-K or Q4 FY2026 earnings) exceeds $35.0B. Resolves NO if it is $35.0B or below.

Resolution Source

Alphabet Inc. FY2026 10-K filing or Q4 2026 earnings report

Source Trigger

Depreciation growth rate vs. revenue growth rate — currently +38% vs +15% (FY2025). Gap persisting 2+ quarters signals margin compression exceeding market expectations.

stress-scannerCAPITAL_DEPLOYMENTHIGH
View GOOG Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis