Archived research. Equity forecasting is part of the Runchey Research archive (methodology era 1) and is no longer actively updated. Everything remains published at its original URL. Browse the archive

Back to Forecasting
GOOGActive

Will Alphabet's depreciation expense exceed $35B in FY2026?

Resolves February 28, 2027(215d)
IG: 0.60

Current Prediction

70%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement92%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedMarch 27, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Depreciation trajectory is the highest-conviction cross-lens finding. Three lenses independently converged on this as the most important near-term financial dynamic. $35B represents a ~66% increase from FY2025's $21.1B — the midpoint of the projected path to $50-55B by FY2027. Exceeding $35B would confirm the depreciation cliff is materializing on schedule. Staying below $35B could indicate useful life extensions or phased CapEx deployment softening the impact.

CAPITAL_DEPLOYMENTNARRATIVE_REALITY_GAP

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 62%74%Aggregate: 70%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
72%

FY2025 depreciation was $21.1B on a CapEx base that includes prior years' spend plus FY2025's $91.4B. FY2026 adds $175-185B of new CapEx. Even at 6-year useful life, the incremental annual depreciation from FY2026 CapEx alone is ~$29-31B. But assets placed in service throughout FY2026 only generate partial-year depreciation — if evenly deployed, the average FY2026 impact is ~$15B incremental. Add the existing run rate (~$21.1B growing organically to ~$24-25B) and total FY2026 depreciation is approximately $36-40B. This exceeds $35B. The main risk to this estimate is further useful life extension or heavy back-loading of CapEx deployment. Setting at 72%.

Existing base growing from $21.1B to ~$24-25B organicallyFY2026 CapEx of $175-185B adds ~$15B incremental partial-year depreciationTotal ~$36-40B exceeds $35B threshold
opusRun 2
65%

The arithmetic supports exceeding $35B, but two factors could keep it below: (1) Management could extend useful lives from 6 to 7 years, reducing annual depreciation by $5-8B — they have precedent and incentive. (2) CapEx composition matters — if a significant portion goes to land and building construction (15-25 year useful lives), the depreciation ramp is slower. Data centers include both servers (3-6 years) and buildings (20+ years). If 40% of CapEx is building/land, the short-life depreciation increment shrinks. Setting at 65% — more likely above $35B than below, but meaningful uncertainty from useful life and asset mix.

Useful life extension precedent (4→6yr in 2024) could repeatCapEx composition: buildings (20yr) vs servers (6yr) matters significantly65% reflects base case above $35B with meaningful downside scenarios
opusRun 3
68%

Let me work backwards. For FY2026 depreciation to stay at or below $35B: (1) Existing asset base depreciation must not grow beyond ~$25B (requires no acceleration — plausible), (2) FY2026 CapEx incremental depreciation must stay below $10B (requires either heavy back-loading of CapEx or very long useful lives on new assets). $10B incremental means FY2026 CapEx generates only 5.5-5.7% first-year depreciation — below typical patterns for tech infrastructure. Possible if buildings dominate early CapEx, but unlikely given the Cloud infrastructure build imperative. Setting at 68% — the math favors exceeding $35B absent deliberate accounting management.

Below-$35B requires very low first-year depreciation rate on new CapExCloud infrastructure urgency favors fast server deployment, not slow building construction68% reflects arithmetic base case with accounting flexibility uncertainty
sonnetRun 1
70%

The math is straightforward. FY2025 depreciation at $21.1B growing organically at ~15-20% = ~$24-25B base. FY2026 CapEx of $180B (midpoint) at ~8% average first-year depreciation rate = ~$14B incremental. Total: ~$38-39B, well above $35B. Only accounting maneuvers (useful life extension, reclassification) keep it below. Setting at 70%.

Organic base growth: $21.1B → ~$24-25BIncremental from FY2026 CapEx: ~$14BTotal ~$38-39B — above threshold
sonnetRun 2
62%

I give more weight to management's ability to manage depreciation. Google already extended useful lives from 4 to 6 years in 2024 to manage the optics. They could do 6 to 7 years — perfectly defensible given infrastructure improvements. This alone could reduce total by $3-5B. Additionally, CapEx deployment is likely phased: more in H2 than H1 (construction timelines), reducing partial-year depreciation. The company has every incentive to keep depreciation looking manageable while the CapEx ramp continues. Setting at 62% — more likely above than below, but management has tools.

Management has precedent and incentive for useful life extensionCapEx likely phased — more H2 deployment means less H1 depreciation62% reflects management's depreciation management capability
sonnetRun 3
73%

Even with a useful life extension to 7 years, the sheer scale of CapEx nearly doubling makes $35B hard to avoid. The existing PP&E base was already generating $21.1B at accelerating rates (+38% FY2025). The incremental FY2025 CapEx of $91.4B is still depreciating through FY2026 at higher run rates. Plus FY2026's $175-185B. Even aggressive accounting management struggles with these numbers. Setting at 73% — the scale overwhelms the accounting flexibility.

Scale of CapEx increase overwhelms accounting flexibilityFY2025 CapEx ($91.4B) still ramping depreciation into FY202673% reflects arithmetic dominance over management's tools
haikuRun 1
70%

$21.1B base growing organically plus massive CapEx ramp. Math supports exceeding $35B. Main risk is useful life extension. Setting at 70%.

$21.1B base growing +38% paceCapEx nearly doubling adds incremental depreciationUseful life extension only meaningful risk to NO
haikuRun 2
66%

Arithmetic favors exceeding $35B but CapEx deployment timing and useful life management create uncertainty. Likely above $35B but not certain. Setting at 66%.

Arithmetic favors YESDeployment timing adds uncertaintyUseful life management possible
haikuRun 3
74%

The $35B threshold is conservative given the CapEx trajectory. Existing depreciation at $21.1B and growing fast, plus massive new CapEx. Even with phased deployment and possible useful life extension, $35B+ is more likely than not. Setting at 74%.

$35B is conservative thresholdExisting base plus CapEx incrementMore likely than not to exceed

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Alphabet's FY2026 depreciation and amortization expense (as reported in the 10-K or Q4 FY2026 earnings) exceeds $35.0B. Resolves NO if it is $35.0B or below.

Resolution Source

Alphabet Inc. FY2026 10-K filing or Q4 2026 earnings report

Source Trigger

Depreciation growth rate vs. revenue growth rate — currently +38% vs +15% (FY2025). Gap persisting 2+ quarters signals margin compression exceeding market expectations.

stress-scannerCAPITAL_DEPLOYMENTHIGH
View GOOG Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis