Archived research. Equity forecasting is part of the Runchey Research archive (methodology era 1) and is no longer actively updated. Everything remains published at its original URL. Browse the archive

Back to Forecasting
GSActive

Will Goldman Sachs report Q2 2026 total net revenues above $14.0B?

Resolves July 31, 2026(25d)
IG: 0.48

Current Prediction

72%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement93%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedApril 13, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Q1 2026's $17.2B net revenue was the second highest in firm history. A modest Q2 result above $14B (about 18% below Q1) is the bar for the 'durability is real' thesis — anything below would confirm that Q1 was a cyclical peak and the steady-state run-rate is lower than the market is pricing.

REVENUE_DURABILITYEXPECTATIONS_PRICED

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 70%74%Aggregate: 72%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
72%

$14B is roughly at the steady-state run-rate floor. Durable revenue base (~$7.6B) plus even modestly weaker cyclical ($6-7B) gets to $13.6-14.6B range. A Q2 below $14B requires a significant cyclical miss — intermediation weakness + investment banking slowdown simultaneously. Most likely Q2 is in the $14-16B range. Probability above $14B: 70-75%.

Durable base ~$7.6BCyclical floor ~$6BRange likely $14-16B
opusRun 2
74%

The backlog is robust, AWM inflows are durable, financing revenues are at records. Even if investment banking normalizes sharply (e.g., advisory back to $800M from $1.5B), the remaining pieces easily support $14B+. 74% probability.

Backlog robustAWM durableFinancing at recordsIB normalization still keeps total above $14B
opusRun 3
70%

70% — I weight slightly lower than peers because the Q1 strength in intermediation could reverse sharply if volatility moderates. Falling $3B+ from Q1 is a real scenario if multiple segments weaken simultaneously. But base case stays above $14B.

Q1 intermediation strength could reverseMulti-segment weakness is tail riskBase case above $14B
sonnetRun 1
72%

GS has not posted a quarter below $14B in recent memory excluding extreme stress periods. The durability thesis makes a sub-$14B quarter unlikely absent a significant shock. 72%.

Historical context supports $14B+Durability thesisRequires significant shock to breach
sonnetRun 2
70%

70%. Base case Q2 $14.5-15.5B. Falling below $14B requires about 18% Q/Q decline which is unusual for GS in a non-crisis quarter.

Base case $14.5-15.5B18% decline needed to breachUnusual in non-crisis
sonnetRun 3
73%

73%. The durable revenue floor plus reasonable cyclical makes $14B a relatively low bar. Probability is elevated but not extreme because of the unavoidable volatility in investment banking fees.

Low bar relative to run-rateInvestment banking volatilityDurable floor
haikuRun 1
72%

72%. Central tendency Q2 revenue ~$15B, with distribution range $13.5-16.5B. Probability above $14B is ~72%.

Central tendency $15BDistribution range $13.5-16.5B72% above $14B
haikuRun 2
73%

73%. Base case is above $14B; the tail risk is a shock to IB activity + intermediation simultaneously.

Base case above $14BTail risk multi-segment shock73%
haikuRun 3
71%

71%. Close to 70-75% range. The $14B bar is moderately low relative to GS's operating run-rate in 2025-2026.

Bar is moderately low70-75% range71%

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Goldman Sachs's reported Q2 2026 total net revenues (from the July 2026 earnings release) exceed $14.0B. Resolves NO if net revenues are at or below $14.0B.

Resolution Source

GS Q2 2026 earnings release

Source Trigger

M&A Advisory Revenue Run-Rate — below $1.0B confirms cyclical peak was Q1 2026

gravy-gaugeREVENUE_DURABILITYMEDIUM
View GS Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis