Back to Forecasting
MMYTActive

Will MMYT utilize 80%+ of the $100M FY27 buyback annual cap (i.e., $80M+ repurchases) by March 31, 2027?

Resolves May 31, 2027(400d)
IG: 0.48

Current Prediction

58%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement95%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedApril 25, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Buyback authorization was raised to $200M total / $100M annual cap with FY30 window in Q3 FY26. Q3 FY26 utilization was $46.1M (highest in MMYT history). 80%+ utilization of the $100M FY27 cap signals management confidence in undervalued shares and disciplined capital deployment. Below-50% utilization would signal either elevated AI/M&A capex needs or weaker free cash flow. Tests CAPITAL_DEPLOYMENT=DISCIPLINED.

CAPITAL_DEPLOYMENTFUNDING_FRAGILITY

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 55%65%Aggregate: 58%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
65%

Q3 FY26 alone hit $46.1M utilization — annualized that's $184M, well above the $80M threshold. Management raised annual cap from $60M to $100M signaling intent to execute. Stock at $46 (29% drawdown) creates buyback economics. Cash position $835M+ supports execution. 2030 notes addition expands toolkit. Trip.com competitor pivot creates defensive-signaling incentive. Major risks: (a) stock appreciation reduces economics, (b) major M&A or AI investment, (c) FX or operational miss. Net: $80M+ FY27 utilization is achievable; main risk is stock spike making economics less attractive. Probability YES: 65%.

Q3 FY26 alone $46.1M = $184M annualized run-rateAnnual cap raised from $60M to $100M signals intentStock at $46 creates buyback economics
opusRun 2
55%

I weight the historical base rate higher. MMYT's full-year buyback execution has historically been at 30-50% of authorized cap. Q3 FY26 was $46.1M — highest in MMYT history — but that's a single quarter, not a sustained pace. Full-year typically has 1-2 strong quarters and 2-3 weak quarters due to blackouts and execution timing. The cap was just raised, and management discipline against operational needs (AI/M&A) may temper utilization. Plus Indian regulatory windows have specific quiet-period restrictions. Q3's high pace may not repeat. Net: 80% utilization of new cap is possible but not central case. Probability YES: 55%.

Historical full-year utilization 30-50%Q3 spike may not be sustainedQuiet-period restrictions limit windows
opusRun 3
62%

Fresh authorization expansion + opportunistic price + 2030 notes flexibility = high probability of $80M+. The historical 30-50% utilization rate was on the OLD $60M cap (so $20-30M actual). The NEW $100M cap with explicit signal of intent should land $70-90M+ even at 70-90% utilization. Q3 FY26's $46.1M shows management has the operational machinery to execute at pace. Probability YES: 62%.

Old cap utilization 30-50% means $20-30M; new cap should land $70M+ at same utilization%Q3 shows operational pace2030 notes flexibility
sonnetRun 1
58%

Recent acceleration is encouraging but the threshold ($80M = 80% of new cap) is at the higher end of typical execution. Q3 FY26 alone was $46.1M but that was opportunistic on the drawdown. Probability of sustaining $20M+ per quarter for 4 consecutive quarters is moderate. Likely outcomes: 60-90% utilization range is most probable, with $80M threshold landing roughly at the median. Probability YES: 58%.

80% utilization is upper end of typicalQ3 opportunistic spike may not sustainRange of likely outcomes brackets $80M threshold
sonnetRun 2
55%

Lean slightly YES. The capital allocation framework supports aggressive utilization at current valuation but there are competing capital needs. AI investment, potential M&A, working capital all compete with buyback. Stock appreciation could reduce buyback economics. The threshold of $80M is meaningful — requires sustained $20M+ per quarter. Probability YES: 55%.

Sustained $20M+ quarterly requiredCompeting capital needsStock appreciation risk to economics
sonnetRun 3
60%

$80M is achievable. The cap was raised specifically to enable aggressive execution. Q3 FY26 at $46M demonstrates capability. 2030 notes purchase flexibility enables alternative deployment. Stock at $46 is attractive. Main risks: rerate above $55-60 reduces economics, M&A/AI capital diversion. Probability YES: 60%.

Cap raise signals intentQ3 demonstrated capability2030 notes flexibility
haikuRun 1
60%

Q3 FY26 alone was $46.1M — annualized exceeds $80M threshold easily. Cap raise signals intent. Stock at attractive level. Probability YES: 60%.

Q3 annualized > $80MCap raise signalAttractive valuation
haikuRun 2
55%

Lean YES with moderate conviction. $80M utilization requires sustained quarterly pace. Q3 was peak quarter. Full year likely lands $70-100M range. Probability YES: 55%.

Sustained quarterly pace neededQ3 was peakRange brackets threshold
haikuRun 3
58%

Fresh authorization + opportunistic price + Q3 demonstrated pace = lean YES. Risk: capital diversion to AI/M&A or stock rerate. Probability YES: 58%.

Authorization signalQ3 paceCapital diversion risk

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if MMYT's cumulative repurchases of Class A ordinary shares plus repurchases of 2028 or 2030 convertible notes (counted at face value) executed under the buyback authorization between April 1, 2026 and March 31, 2027 (FY27) total $80.0 million or more, as disclosed in 6-K filings, earnings releases, and the FY27 20-F. Resolves NO if total is below $80.0 million. Class B repurchases (the strategic Trip.com action) are excluded — the question is about normal-course buyback execution.

Resolution Source

MMYT 6-K disclosures throughout FY27, FY27 20-F filing

Source Trigger

Buyback execution pace: $100M annual cap utilization rate; aggressive utilization signals confidence

stress-scannerCAPITAL_DEPLOYMENTMEDIUM
View MMYT Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis