Archived research. Equity forecasting is part of the Runchey Research archive (methodology era 1) and is no longer actively updated. Everything remains published at its original URL. Browse the archive

Back to Forecasting
MMYTActive

Will MMYT utilize 80%+ of the $100M FY27 buyback annual cap (i.e., $80M+ repurchases) by March 31, 2027?

Resolves May 31, 2027(307d)
IG: 0.48

Current Prediction

58%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement95%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedApril 25, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Buyback authorization was raised to $200M total / $100M annual cap with FY30 window in Q3 FY26. Q3 FY26 utilization was $46.1M (highest in MMYT history). 80%+ utilization of the $100M FY27 cap signals management confidence in undervalued shares and disciplined capital deployment. Below-50% utilization would signal either elevated AI/M&A capex needs or weaker free cash flow. Tests CAPITAL_DEPLOYMENT=DISCIPLINED.

CAPITAL_DEPLOYMENTFUNDING_FRAGILITY

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 55%65%Aggregate: 58%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
65%

Q3 FY26 alone hit $46.1M utilization — annualized that's $184M, well above the $80M threshold. Management raised annual cap from $60M to $100M signaling intent to execute. Stock at $46 (29% drawdown) creates buyback economics. Cash position $835M+ supports execution. 2030 notes addition expands toolkit. Trip.com competitor pivot creates defensive-signaling incentive. Major risks: (a) stock appreciation reduces economics, (b) major M&A or AI investment, (c) FX or operational miss. Net: $80M+ FY27 utilization is achievable; main risk is stock spike making economics less attractive. Probability YES: 65%.

Q3 FY26 alone $46.1M = $184M annualized run-rateAnnual cap raised from $60M to $100M signals intentStock at $46 creates buyback economics
opusRun 2
55%

I weight the historical base rate higher. MMYT's full-year buyback execution has historically been at 30-50% of authorized cap. Q3 FY26 was $46.1M — highest in MMYT history — but that's a single quarter, not a sustained pace. Full-year typically has 1-2 strong quarters and 2-3 weak quarters due to blackouts and execution timing. The cap was just raised, and management discipline against operational needs (AI/M&A) may temper utilization. Plus Indian regulatory windows have specific quiet-period restrictions. Q3's high pace may not repeat. Net: 80% utilization of new cap is possible but not central case. Probability YES: 55%.

Historical full-year utilization 30-50%Q3 spike may not be sustainedQuiet-period restrictions limit windows
opusRun 3
62%

Fresh authorization expansion + opportunistic price + 2030 notes flexibility = high probability of $80M+. The historical 30-50% utilization rate was on the OLD $60M cap (so $20-30M actual). The NEW $100M cap with explicit signal of intent should land $70-90M+ even at 70-90% utilization. Q3 FY26's $46.1M shows management has the operational machinery to execute at pace. Probability YES: 62%.

Old cap utilization 30-50% means $20-30M; new cap should land $70M+ at same utilization%Q3 shows operational pace2030 notes flexibility
sonnetRun 1
58%

Recent acceleration is encouraging but the threshold ($80M = 80% of new cap) is at the higher end of typical execution. Q3 FY26 alone was $46.1M but that was opportunistic on the drawdown. Probability of sustaining $20M+ per quarter for 4 consecutive quarters is moderate. Likely outcomes: 60-90% utilization range is most probable, with $80M threshold landing roughly at the median. Probability YES: 58%.

80% utilization is upper end of typicalQ3 opportunistic spike may not sustainRange of likely outcomes brackets $80M threshold
sonnetRun 2
55%

Lean slightly YES. The capital allocation framework supports aggressive utilization at current valuation but there are competing capital needs. AI investment, potential M&A, working capital all compete with buyback. Stock appreciation could reduce buyback economics. The threshold of $80M is meaningful — requires sustained $20M+ per quarter. Probability YES: 55%.

Sustained $20M+ quarterly requiredCompeting capital needsStock appreciation risk to economics
sonnetRun 3
60%

$80M is achievable. The cap was raised specifically to enable aggressive execution. Q3 FY26 at $46M demonstrates capability. 2030 notes purchase flexibility enables alternative deployment. Stock at $46 is attractive. Main risks: rerate above $55-60 reduces economics, M&A/AI capital diversion. Probability YES: 60%.

Cap raise signals intentQ3 demonstrated capability2030 notes flexibility
haikuRun 1
60%

Q3 FY26 alone was $46.1M — annualized exceeds $80M threshold easily. Cap raise signals intent. Stock at attractive level. Probability YES: 60%.

Q3 annualized > $80MCap raise signalAttractive valuation
haikuRun 2
55%

Lean YES with moderate conviction. $80M utilization requires sustained quarterly pace. Q3 was peak quarter. Full year likely lands $70-100M range. Probability YES: 55%.

Sustained quarterly pace neededQ3 was peakRange brackets threshold
haikuRun 3
58%

Fresh authorization + opportunistic price + Q3 demonstrated pace = lean YES. Risk: capital diversion to AI/M&A or stock rerate. Probability YES: 58%.

Authorization signalQ3 paceCapital diversion risk

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if MMYT's cumulative repurchases of Class A ordinary shares plus repurchases of 2028 or 2030 convertible notes (counted at face value) executed under the buyback authorization between April 1, 2026 and March 31, 2027 (FY27) total $80.0 million or more, as disclosed in 6-K filings, earnings releases, and the FY27 20-F. Resolves NO if total is below $80.0 million. Class B repurchases (the strategic Trip.com action) are excluded — the question is about normal-course buyback execution.

Resolution Source

MMYT 6-K disclosures throughout FY27, FY27 20-F filing

Source Trigger

Buyback execution pace: $100M annual cap utilization rate; aggressive utilization signals confidence

stress-scannerCAPITAL_DEPLOYMENTMEDIUM
View MMYT Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis