Back to Forecasting
MMYTActive

Will MMYT's Q4 FY26 (JFM 2026) reported Hotel take rate fall below 17.0%?

Resolves June 15, 2026(50d)
IG: 0.80

Current Prediction

20%
Likely No
Model Agreement95%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedApril 25, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Hotel take rate stability at 17.7% is the load-bearing measure of pricing-power durability identified in gravy-gauge and moat-mapper. Q4 FY26 (May 2026 results) is the first read post-GST anniversary and tests whether mix shift to budget hotels under Rs 7,500 (now 5% GST) is compressing take rate. A stable print at 17.2-18.2% validates REVENUE_DURABILITY=CONDITIONAL holding; below 17% would push toward FRAGILE and signal supplier or competitive pressure. NO is the consensus expectation given 17.7% has held through three disrupted quarters.

REVENUE_DURABILITYCOMPETITIVE_POSITION

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 16%25%Aggregate: 20%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
18%

Hotel take rate has held at 17.7% for 3+ consecutive disclosed quarters Q1-Q3 FY26 despite GST rationalization in Sep 2025 that shifted 70%+ of volumes into the budget category. Adjusted operating margin actually improved (1.76% to 1.82% of GB). Mohit Kabra explicitly walked through take rate stability mechanics with analysts in Q3 FY26 — confidence-weighted answer. Threshold of 17.0% is 70bps below current — meaningful break required, not noise. With management explicitly framing supplier-side stability and no listed competitor pressuring, the base rate strongly favors NO. Some downside from continued mix shift (post-GST budget mix could compound) plus Q4 (March-end) seasonal promotional intensity. Net probability YES (take rate <17.0%): 18%.

3+ consecutive quarters at 17.7% despite GST mix shiftHotels uncontested among listed Indian OTAsAdjusted op margin trending UP (1.76% → 1.82%) signals pricing power intact
opusRun 2
22%

The supplier moat in hotels is genuinely strong (97K+ properties, fragmented base) and 17.7% has been stable. However, Q4 FY26 carries specific incremental risks: (a) GST anniversary tail effect — the post-GST cohort accumulates in this quarter, (b) March-end (financial year close) seasonal promotional intensity in Indian retail/travel, (c) the Trip.com strategic pivot creates pressure even if the competitor product hasn't launched yet — international hotel inventory dynamics may shift. Plus the question asks 'fall below 17.0%' — even a modest 50bps mix-shift compression would not trigger; only 75bps+ would. That's a tighter test than the standard +/- 50bps band Mohit framed as normal. Probability YES: 22%.

GST anniversary tail effect in Q4March-end promotional seasonality could optically compressBut 70bps break is high bar given 3-quarter stability
opusRun 3
16%

The structural argument for stability is robust: management explicitly disclosed take rate as intentionally stable via supplier-side mechanics. The dossier shows no soft language around upcoming pressure. Take rate didn't compress in Q1-Q3 FY26 even though that's when the GST mix shift was most acute (immediate post-implementation). By Q4 FY26 (5-6 months post-GST), the mix shift is largely cycled into the take-rate base. Below 17.0% would require a NEW mechanism to emerge in Q4 that wasn't visible Q1-Q3. Trip.com competitor isn't live yet, supplier base hasn't pushed, and international OTA share is unchanged. Strong NO bias. Probability YES: 16%.

Take rate unchanged through GST implementation peakNo new pressure mechanism emerging in Q4Management explicit on stability mechanics
sonnetRun 1
20%

Three-quarter stability at 17.7% through GST mix shift is strong evidence. The 17.0% threshold requires 70bps deterioration which is outside the typical seasonal noise band. Drivers for NO: supplier moat (uncontested), management explicit stability commentary, adjusted op margin trending up. Drivers for YES: GST anniversary tail effect cumulates in Q4, post-GST budget mix could finally show up after lagged supplier renegotiation, March-end seasonal promo intensity. The probability that the very next quarter would break the trend that held for 3 prior quarters is low absent a specific catalyst. Probability YES: 20%.

3-quarter base rate of 17.7% stability70bps threshold is meaningful break not noiseGST anniversary may create lagged compression
sonnetRun 2
25%

Supplier-side moat is real but I weight Q4 specific risks higher. March-end is the last quarter of MMYT's fiscal year — performance pressure to deliver year-end metrics could push management to use take rate as a lever (e.g., promotional rebates, inventory subsidies). Additionally, the 70bps threshold seems demanding but isn't outside seasonal noise — Q4 take rates can fluctuate +/-50-80bps quarter-to-quarter even in stable platforms. The 17.7% reported figure may have been 17.65% (rounded up to 18% in some disclosures). Conservative range estimate puts the probability higher than naive base rate. Probability YES: 25%.

March-end fiscal pressure on metricsQ4 seasonal noise can be 50-80bpsReported 17.7% may have been 17.65% upward-rounded
sonnetRun 3
19%

Hotel take rate stability is the cleanest part of MMYT's thesis — supplier moat is uncontested, margins improving, management explicit. The 17.0% threshold is meaningful break. Q4 FY26 has the GST anniversary tail effect but: (a) GST started Sep 2025 so anniversary is Sep 2026 (Q2 FY27), not Q4 FY26 — the pressure is already largely cycled in, (b) Q3 FY26 already saw post-GST budget mix peak and take rate held, (c) management has tools (promotional discipline, supplier renegotiation, inventory mix) to defend. Probability YES: 19%.

GST anniversary is Q2 FY27 not Q4 FY26 — pressure already cycledQ3 FY26 saw post-GST mix peak with no compressionManagement has multiple tools to defend
haikuRun 1
20%

Strong base rate of 17.7% stability for 3 quarters. Threshold of 17.0% requires 70bps break which is meaningful, not seasonal noise. Hotels segment uncontested among listed Indian OTAs. Management explicitly disclosed stability mechanics. Some risk from GST anniversary mix effect and Q4 seasonal promo pressure. Probability YES (take rate <17.0%): 20%.

3-quarter stability at 17.7%70bps break is high barUncontested hotels moat
haikuRun 2
23%

Hotels take rate stability is the highest-conviction part of the thesis. But Q4 March-end seasonality, post-GST mix shift compounding, and Trip.com competitive overhang create modest downside. 70bps break is the threshold and Q4 historical seasonality typically allows 50-80bps swings. Probability slightly above 20% to reflect Q4-specific risk. Probability YES: 23%.

Q4 March-end seasonality riskGST mix-shift may show up with lagBut 3-quarter base rate strongly favors stability
haikuRun 3
18%

Take rate of 17.7% has held through three quarters of stress including GST implementation peak. Threshold of 17.0% requires meaningful supplier or competitive pressure that isn't currently in evidence. Mohit Kabra's explicit Q3 FY26 walkthrough on stability mechanics is strong management signal. Probability YES: 18%.

Stability through GST peakManagement explicit on mechanics70bps threshold is demanding

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if MMYT's reported Hotels & Packages take rate (Adjusted Margin / Gross Bookings for the H&P segment) for Q4 FY26 (JFM 2026, the quarter ending March 31, 2026) as disclosed in the Q4 FY26 6-K earnings release or operating metrics disclosure is strictly less than 17.0%. Resolves NO if 17.0% or higher. If MMYT discloses a different metric (e.g., revenue/GBV or net revenue/GBV), use the closest equivalent definition consistent with how 17.7% was disclosed in Q3 FY26.

Resolution Source

MMYT Q4 FY26 6-K earnings release / operating metrics, expected mid-May 2026

Source Trigger

Hotel take rate stability at 17.7% +/- 50bps; below 17% would signal supplier/competitive pressure

gravy-gaugeREVENUE_DURABILITYHIGH
View MMYT Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis