Back to Forecasting
SGIActive

Will SGI's credit-facility leverage ratio print at or below 3.0x in Q2 2026 10-Q?

Resolves August 31, 2026(130d)
IG: 0.36

Current Prediction

68%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement96%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedApril 22, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Management committed to 2.0-3.0x leverage by mid-2026. Q2 2026 10-Q (filed early August) is the earliest public confirmation. A YES validates the deleveraging discipline and lets FUNDING_FRAGILITY remain MANAGEABLE. A NO (leverage above 3.0x) signals the 50% FCF capital-return cadence is competing too aggressively with debt paydown, or that EBITDA denominator is softer than guided. Note: Leggett deal is all-stock and does not add cash debt, but closing late in the window may complicate the ratio via Leggett debt assumption.

FUNDING_FRAGILITYCAPITAL_DEPLOYMENT

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 65%70%Aggregate: 68%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
68%

Trajectory math: 3.5x -> 3.3x -> 3.2x over 3 quarters = ~0.1x improvement per quarter. From Q4 2025 at 3.2x to Q2 2026 is 2 more quarters = projected 3.0x. 'At or below 3.0x' is exactly on target. Positives: $700M+ FCF supports continued paydown, credit-facility ratio typically includes synergy add-backs, management demonstrated $300M discrete paydown Q3 2025. Negatives: 50% FCF capital return policy reduces paydown cadence starting Q1 2026, Leggett deal timing could add Leggett debt (though all-stock and unlikely to close in Q2). Management target is 2.0-3.0x BY mid-2026; the target implicitly allows either boundary. Probability 0.68 for 'at or below 3.0x' (includes boundary).

Trajectory of 0.1x improvement per quarter projects to 3.0x in Q2Credit-facility ratio synergy add-backs favor reported number50% FCF capital return compresses paydown cadence
opusRun 2
65%

More cautious: the 50% FCF capital return (dividends + buybacks) resumed Q1 2026 meaningfully cuts available cash for debt paydown. Prior cadence was heavy paydown without capital returns; now competing. $700M FCF - $145M dividend - $200M buyback = $355M available for debt paydown over 4 quarters = ~$90M/quarter. Prior Q3 2025 was $300M paydown in single quarter. New pace is slower. Combined with possible Leggett close complication (even though all-stock, Leggett debt assumption affects ratio), target might slip to Q3. Probability 0.65.

Capital return cadence slows paydown to ~$90M/qtrLeggett close if H1 complicates ratioTarget might slip to Q3 from mid-year
opusRun 3
70%

Management has strong incentive to hit the public 2.0-3.0x commitment — CFO Rao specifically said '6 months' from Q4 2025 call. Credit-facility ratio allows pro-forma synergy adjustments which favor SGI. EBITDA denominator will likely grow as 2026 synergies flow through ($55M cost synergy incremental 2026). Even if paydown slows, EBITDA growth alone could push ratio from 3.2x down toward 3.0x. Land at 0.70.

CFO specific '6 months' commitment creates accountabilityEBITDA denominator growth from synergies helps ratio mechanicallyPro-forma synergy adjustments favor SGI
sonnetRun 1
67%

Trajectory of 0.1x per quarter puts the math right at 3.0x by Q2 2026. Management commitment is explicit. 'At or below 3.0x' includes the boundary, so if trajectory holds exactly, this resolves YES. Capital return cadence is the main swing factor — if buybacks exceed $200M/qtr, paydown slows and ratio could be 3.05x. Land at 0.67.

Trajectory lands exactly at 3.0x by Q2Boundary inclusion helps YES caseCapital return cadence swing factor
sonnetRun 2
65%

Conservative given timing risk — Q2 10-Q is reported early August and reflects June 30 snapshot. If Leggett closes in June, the ratio could be disrupted. If EBITDA growth doesn't track the synergy guide, denominator weakens. Probability 0.65.

Leggett close timing riskEBITDA denominator tracking riskTight trajectory leaves little buffer
sonnetRun 3
70%

Credit-facility ratio typically has pro-forma synergy adjustments + TTM EBITDA that rolls forward favorably as strong quarters replace weak ones. EBITDA TTM expanding + paydown of $90M/qtr + boundary inclusion at 3.0x = probably lands at 3.0x or just below. 0.70.

TTM EBITDA rolling favorablyPro-forma synergy adjustments help ratioBoundary inclusion + trajectory = likely YES
haikuRun 1
67%

Trajectory projects to 3.0x in Q2. Management publicly committed. Credit facility synergy adjustments favor SGI. Capital return competition for cash the main risk. 0.67.

Trajectory-based projection to 3.0xManagement public commitmentCapital return competition
haikuRun 2
68%

Lean YES given (a) explicit management target, (b) trajectory math, (c) boundary inclusion. Main risk: capital return cadence slower paydown. 0.68.

Explicit management targetTrajectory math favorableBoundary inclusion helps
haikuRun 3
70%

$700M+ FCF, $225M synergy capture, CFO specific 6-month commitment — all support target hit. Credit facility pro-forma adjustments provide cushion. 0.70.

FCF strongCFO 6-month commitmentPro-forma adjustments cushion

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if SGI Q2 2026 10-Q (expected filing early August 2026) discloses a credit-facility leverage ratio (or equivalent net-debt-to-EBITDA metric) at or below 3.0x. Resolves NO if the Q2 2026 metric is above 3.0x, or if the metric is not disclosed by 2026-08-31.

Resolution Source

SGI Q2 2026 10-Q filing, earnings release, or credit-facility compliance statement

Source Trigger

Leverage trajectory — should hit 2–3x by mid-2026

stress-scannerFUNDING_FRAGILITYHIGH
View SGI Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis