Back to Forecasting
SOLSActive

Will any SOLS insider make discretionary sales exceeding $1M by end of 2026?

Resolves January 31, 2027(312d)
IG: 0.36

Current Prediction

35%
Likely No
Model Agreement94%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedMarch 22, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Post-spinoff insider behavior provides a unique window into management confidence. Zero discretionary selling in the first 5 months is modestly positive. Significant selling (>$1M) by any C-suite executive would be bearish — especially while the company is still establishing standalone credibility. Continued holding reinforces the ADEQUATE governance alignment.

GOVERNANCE_ALIGNMENT

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 30%40%Aggregate: 35%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
35%

No discretionary selling in 5 months post-spinoff is modestly positive. However, as the company matures and executives accumulate more shares through RSU vests, the incentive to diversify increases. Over a 9-month remaining window (March-December 2026), there are multiple RSU vesting dates where sell-to-cover could exceed $1M. The question asks about discretionary sales (non-RSU, non-10b5-1), which filters out standard tax withholding. True discretionary selling is less likely given management appears committed.

No selling in 5 months is modestly positive signal9-month remaining window provides time for selling to occurDiscretionary (non-RSU) criterion reduces probability
opusRun 2
30%

Base rate for discretionary insider selling at newly spun-off industrial companies is relatively low in the first 18 months. Management teams that initiated a dividend and are pursuing growth investments typically signal long-term commitment. CEO Sewell has no discretionary transactions. The $1M threshold is significant but not enormous for C-suite executives. The absence of 10b5-1 plans also suggests no planned selling. 30% reflects the long time window but low base rate.

Low base rate for discretionary selling in first 18 monthsDividend initiation signals management commitmentNo 10b5-1 plans suggests no planned selling
opusRun 3
32%

Lower confidence because insider selling is event-driven and hard to predict. A personal liquidity need, divorce, estate planning, or simply portfolio diversification could trigger selling at any time regardless of company conviction. The question covers 9 remaining months. However, the discretionary and $1M thresholds meaningfully filter the probability. Most insider selling at newly public companies is RSU-related, not discretionary.

Event-driven nature makes prediction difficultPersonal reasons could trigger selling regardless of convictionDiscretionary + $1M threshold filters most activity
sonnetRun 1
40%

Nine months is a long window. Post-spinoff, executives have concentrated equity positions in a single company (previously diversified through Honeywell). As financial advisors recommend diversification, discretionary selling becomes more likely over time. Director shares from the spinoff distribution are also at risk of sales. The $1M threshold is relatively modest for senior executives. 40% reflects the significant time horizon and diversification pressure.

9-month window is long for insider selling questionsConcentrated equity positions invite diversification$1M threshold is modest for senior executives
sonnetRun 2
35%

The absence of selling in 5 months is informative but not definitive. Many spinoffs have informal lock-up periods of 6-12 months even when no contractual lock-up exists. The window from Q3 2026 onward (after the first anniversary) may see increased selling activity. However, the discretionary criterion is important and the management team appears genuinely committed to the nuclear thesis.

Informal lock-up periods may end around 12-month anniversaryQ3-Q4 2026 window is when selling becomes more likelyManagement appears genuinely committed
sonnetRun 3
38%

Difficult to predict individual behavior. The population of potential sellers includes the full C-suite plus directors, expanding the probability that at least one makes a discretionary sale. Even a single estate-planning or diversification sale by one executive could exceed $1M. Low confidence because this depends on individual circumstances more than corporate fundamentals.

Multiple potential sellers expands probabilitySingle estate-planning sale could exceed thresholdIndividual circumstances dominate corporate fundamentals
haikuRun 1
33%

No selling in 5 months, no 10b5-1 plans, dividend signals commitment. But 9 months remaining and multiple executives could sell. Discretionary threshold helps but base rate for some selling in 9 months is moderate.

Positive signals from first 5 months9-month window is significantMultiple potential sellers
haikuRun 2
30%

Management team appears committed. Dividend initiation is a positive signal. CEO has no transactions. Discretionary selling is less common in first 18 months of spinoffs. 30% reflects long window but low base rate.

Management commitment signalsDiscretionary selling uncommon early post-spinoffLong window moderately increases probability
haikuRun 3
35%

Balanced between positive insider holding signals and the long remaining window. Directors may be more likely to sell than C-suite. $1M threshold is achievable for senior executives.

Directors may sell before C-suite$1M is achievable for senior execsPositive holding signals balance long window

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if any Form 4 filing between March 22, 2026 and December 31, 2026 shows a SOLS officer or director making discretionary (non-RSU-vest, non-10b5-1) open market sales totaling more than $1M.

Resolution Source

SEC EDGAR Form 4 filings for SOLS insiders

Source Trigger

Any discretionary insider selling >$1M

insider-investigatorGOVERNANCE_ALIGNMENTMEDIUM
View SOLS Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis