Back to Forecasting
STUBActive

Will StubHub's Q1 2026 take rate (revenue / GMS) print at or above 19.5%?

Resolves June 15, 2026(50d)
IG: 0.80

Current Prediction

45%
Likely No
Model Agreement93%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedApril 25, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Take-rate reversion is the load-bearing question for REVENUE_DURABILITY. Q4 2025 take rate compressed to 19% from 'historically consistent ~20%' as mgmt took 'a point' to fund share gains. The 19.5% threshold is the midpoint between the trough and historical baseline — testing the deliberate-investment-then-revert narrative within Q1 (the first quarter under post-IPO scrutiny). A clean print at/above 19.5% validates CONDITIONAL holding rather than slipping toward FRAGILE; a print below 19.5% supports the structural-concession bear thesis (Fugazi Filter view) and undermines the Adj EBITDA guide's largest assumption.

REVENUE_DURABILITYGROWTH_TRAJECTORYNARRATIVE_REALITY_GAP

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 40%48%Aggregate: 45%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
42%

Q4 trough at 19%, mgmt commits to ~20% for 2026, but quarterly reversion trajectory unspecified. Q1 typically lower take-rate (event mix) + 4 of 5 FTC comp lap months still adverse + competitive fee pressure unresolved. 19.5% midpoint threshold is reachable but not certain on Q1 specifically. Mgmt incentive to show early reversion in first public quarter is real. ~42%.

Q1 seasonality lower takeFTC comp 4/5 lap months adverseMgmt explicit reversion commitFirst post-IPO public scrutiny
opusRun 2
46%

Mgmt explicit commitment in Q4 call + Q1 first public-company quarter creates strong incentive. Take rate is controllable (vs. GMS event-dependent). World Cup mix may temporarily depress (lower-fee category) but Q1 mostly pre-World Cup. Bulk-reseller subset (~10%) typically higher take supports Q1 if intact. Marginal lean above 19.5%. ~46%.

Take rate controllable leverFirst public-company quarterBulk-reseller higher takeMgmt incentive aligned
opusRun 3
40%

Skeptical: mgmt language was reversion 'over 2026' not Q1-immediate. Competitive pressure from SeatGeek/Vivid Seats unresolved — Fugazi Filter view that compression is structural concession remains live. 19.5% is exactly midpoint between trough and baseline; Q1 print could land at 19.2-19.4% on event mix alone even with some reversion underway. ~40%.

Reversion timing ambiguousCompetitive pressure unresolvedQ1 event mix tiltStructural-concession view live
sonnetRun 1
45%

Mgmt commit to ~20% for 2026 + first public quarter incentive supports modest reversion in Q1. But quarterly trajectory ambiguous and Q1 typically lower-take season. 19.5% is exactly midpoint — coin-flip-with-slight-lean. Asset-light agency model preserves >80% gross margin so the 19% Q4 wasn't margin-stressing — reversion is more about competitive equilibrium than internal pressure. ~45%.

Midpoint thresholdMgmt commit + incentiveQ1 seasonality riskCompetitive equilibrium uncertain
sonnetRun 2
48%

Constructive: Q1 is the first quantitative validation point for the bull thesis post-Q4 walk-backs. Mgmt has high incentive to show early reversion. 19.5% threshold is achievable if even 50bps of reversion materializes. Q4 trough at 19% sets up gradient. Bulk-reseller mix typically higher take in Q1. Slight lean above coin-flip. ~48%.

Q1 first validation pointMgmt high incentive50bps reversion easily clearsQ4 was likely trough
sonnetRun 3
43%

Three concerns weight to slight-below-coin-flip: (1) mgmt didn't commit to Q1 specifically; (2) FTC comp pressure 4/5 months adverse in Q1; (3) Fugazi Filter view of structural concession unresolved. Counter: mgmt incentive + first public quarter. Net slightly below 50/50. ~43%.

Q1 specificity not committedFTC comp Q1 headwindStructural concession risk
haikuRun 1
45%

Q4 trough 19%, mgmt commits to ~20% reversion in 2026. Q1 first public quarter incentive. 19.5% midpoint achievable. Q1 seasonality + FTC comp pressure offsets. Coin-flip with slight lean toward NO given Q1 specificity. ~45%.

Mgmt reversion commitQ1 first public quarterQ1 seasonalityFTC comp pressure
haikuRun 2
42%

Reversion timing unspecified at quarterly level. Competitive pressure from SeatGeek/Vivid Seats live. 19.5% midpoint can land just below on event mix. Slight below coin-flip. ~42%.

Quarterly trajectory unspecifiedCompetitive pressureEvent mix risk
haikuRun 3
47%

Mgmt incentive to validate early in first public quarter is strong. 50bps reversion easily clears 19.5%. Take rate is controllable lever vs. GMS. Coin-flip with slight upward lean. ~47%.

Mgmt validation incentive50bps clears thresholdTake rate controllable

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if StubHub Holdings (NYSE: STUB) reports Q1 2026 revenue divided by Q1 2026 GMS at or above 19.5% per the company's earnings release or 10-Q. Resolves NO otherwise. Source: Q1 2026 earnings release / 10-Q filing.

Resolution Source

STUB Q1 2026 earnings release / 10-Q

Source Trigger

Q1 2026 take rate (revenue / GMS) — gravy-gauge: >= 20% by Q3 2026 supports thesis; < 19.5% by Q3 2026 indicates structural compression

gravy-gaugeREVENUE_DURABILITYHIGH
View STUB Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis