Archived research. Equity forecasting is part of the Runchey Research archive (methodology era 1) and is no longer actively updated. Everything remains published at its original URL. Browse the archive

Back to Forecasting
STUBActive

Will StubHub's Q1 2026 take rate (revenue / GMS) print at or above 19.5%?

Resolves June 15, 2026
IG: 0.80

Current Prediction

45%
Likely No
Model Agreement93%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedApril 25, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Take-rate reversion is the load-bearing question for REVENUE_DURABILITY. Q4 2025 take rate compressed to 19% from 'historically consistent ~20%' as mgmt took 'a point' to fund share gains. The 19.5% threshold is the midpoint between the trough and historical baseline — testing the deliberate-investment-then-revert narrative within Q1 (the first quarter under post-IPO scrutiny). A clean print at/above 19.5% validates CONDITIONAL holding rather than slipping toward FRAGILE; a print below 19.5% supports the structural-concession bear thesis (Fugazi Filter view) and undermines the Adj EBITDA guide's largest assumption.

REVENUE_DURABILITYGROWTH_TRAJECTORYNARRATIVE_REALITY_GAP

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 40%48%Aggregate: 45%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
42%

Q4 trough at 19%, mgmt commits to ~20% for 2026, but quarterly reversion trajectory unspecified. Q1 typically lower take-rate (event mix) + 4 of 5 FTC comp lap months still adverse + competitive fee pressure unresolved. 19.5% midpoint threshold is reachable but not certain on Q1 specifically. Mgmt incentive to show early reversion in first public quarter is real. ~42%.

Q1 seasonality lower takeFTC comp 4/5 lap months adverseMgmt explicit reversion commitFirst post-IPO public scrutiny
opusRun 2
46%

Mgmt explicit commitment in Q4 call + Q1 first public-company quarter creates strong incentive. Take rate is controllable (vs. GMS event-dependent). World Cup mix may temporarily depress (lower-fee category) but Q1 mostly pre-World Cup. Bulk-reseller subset (~10%) typically higher take supports Q1 if intact. Marginal lean above 19.5%. ~46%.

Take rate controllable leverFirst public-company quarterBulk-reseller higher takeMgmt incentive aligned
opusRun 3
40%

Skeptical: mgmt language was reversion 'over 2026' not Q1-immediate. Competitive pressure from SeatGeek/Vivid Seats unresolved — Fugazi Filter view that compression is structural concession remains live. 19.5% is exactly midpoint between trough and baseline; Q1 print could land at 19.2-19.4% on event mix alone even with some reversion underway. ~40%.

Reversion timing ambiguousCompetitive pressure unresolvedQ1 event mix tiltStructural-concession view live
sonnetRun 1
45%

Mgmt commit to ~20% for 2026 + first public quarter incentive supports modest reversion in Q1. But quarterly trajectory ambiguous and Q1 typically lower-take season. 19.5% is exactly midpoint — coin-flip-with-slight-lean. Asset-light agency model preserves >80% gross margin so the 19% Q4 wasn't margin-stressing — reversion is more about competitive equilibrium than internal pressure. ~45%.

Midpoint thresholdMgmt commit + incentiveQ1 seasonality riskCompetitive equilibrium uncertain
sonnetRun 2
48%

Constructive: Q1 is the first quantitative validation point for the bull thesis post-Q4 walk-backs. Mgmt has high incentive to show early reversion. 19.5% threshold is achievable if even 50bps of reversion materializes. Q4 trough at 19% sets up gradient. Bulk-reseller mix typically higher take in Q1. Slight lean above coin-flip. ~48%.

Q1 first validation pointMgmt high incentive50bps reversion easily clearsQ4 was likely trough
sonnetRun 3
43%

Three concerns weight to slight-below-coin-flip: (1) mgmt didn't commit to Q1 specifically; (2) FTC comp pressure 4/5 months adverse in Q1; (3) Fugazi Filter view of structural concession unresolved. Counter: mgmt incentive + first public quarter. Net slightly below 50/50. ~43%.

Q1 specificity not committedFTC comp Q1 headwindStructural concession risk
haikuRun 1
45%

Q4 trough 19%, mgmt commits to ~20% reversion in 2026. Q1 first public quarter incentive. 19.5% midpoint achievable. Q1 seasonality + FTC comp pressure offsets. Coin-flip with slight lean toward NO given Q1 specificity. ~45%.

Mgmt reversion commitQ1 first public quarterQ1 seasonalityFTC comp pressure
haikuRun 2
42%

Reversion timing unspecified at quarterly level. Competitive pressure from SeatGeek/Vivid Seats live. 19.5% midpoint can land just below on event mix. Slight below coin-flip. ~42%.

Quarterly trajectory unspecifiedCompetitive pressureEvent mix risk
haikuRun 3
47%

Mgmt incentive to validate early in first public quarter is strong. 50bps reversion easily clears 19.5%. Take rate is controllable lever vs. GMS. Coin-flip with slight upward lean. ~47%.

Mgmt validation incentive50bps clears thresholdTake rate controllable

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if StubHub Holdings (NYSE: STUB) reports Q1 2026 revenue divided by Q1 2026 GMS at or above 19.5% per the company's earnings release or 10-Q. Resolves NO otherwise. Source: Q1 2026 earnings release / 10-Q filing.

Resolution Source

STUB Q1 2026 earnings release / 10-Q

Source Trigger

Q1 2026 take rate (revenue / GMS) — gravy-gauge: >= 20% by Q3 2026 supports thesis; < 19.5% by Q3 2026 indicates structural compression

gravy-gaugeREVENUE_DURABILITYHIGH
View STUB Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis