Back to Forecasting
WFCActive

Will Wells Fargo receive any new consent order from Fed, OCC, CFPB, or DOJ by year-end 2026?

Resolves January 15, 2027(276d)
IG: 0.40

Current Prediction

15%
Likely No
Model Agreement88%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedApril 13, 2026

Why This Question Matters

The tail-risk test for regulatory exposure. 13 orders closed since 2019, 7 in 2025. Any new order would reactivate the 2016 scandal public memory and shift the regulatory assessment to ELEVATED.

REGULATORY_EXPOSUREASSUMPTION_FRAGILITY

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 13%17%Aggregate: 15%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
14%

Base rate for a large US bank receiving a new consent order in an 8-month window is roughly 5-12%. WFC specifically benefits from 7 years of post-scandal remediation culminating in Fed asset cap removal Q2 2025. Current administration's regulatory posture is generally less active on enforcement. Low probability but non-zero.

Base rate 5-12%WFC remediation track recordCurrent administration posture
opusRun 2
16%

Low probability. WFC has closed 13 orders since 2019 and 7 in 2025 alone — this is not a one-off pattern. However, residual variance exists given the 2016 scandal base. Control infrastructure is permanent $2.5B/yr. The question is whether any legacy issue surfaces or any new compliance lapse occurs.

13 orders closed2016 scandal residual variancePermanent control infrastructure
opusRun 3
13%

Lean slightly below base rate given WFC-specific validation signals (Fed removed asset cap, 7 orders closed in 2025, management explicitly shifted posture). Management treats risk infrastructure as permanent. Probability of a new order is low and concentrated in residual tail risk.

Below base rateFed validation via cap removalManagement posture shift
sonnetRun 1
15%

Low probability. The pattern of 2025 (7 closures, 0 additions) suggests continued unidirectional trend. However, the 8-month window is meaningful and G-SIB supervision is continuous. Residual base rate captured.

Unidirectional trend 20258-month windowG-SIB supervision
sonnetRun 2
17%

Slightly above my primary estimate because 2026 is a year of change (asset cap removal, aggressive growth, new markets book). Aggressive growth into new areas historically correlates with new compliance issues emerging. Still low probability but variance-adjusted.

Growth into new areasMarkets book expansionVariance adjustment
sonnetRun 3
14%

Low probability. Management has demonstrated ability to close issues and asset cap removal is the strongest validation signal. The residual concern is unknown-unknowns from new product areas or legacy discoveries.

Management demonstrated closureAsset cap removal validationUnknown-unknowns residual
haikuRun 1
15%

Low probability based on remediation track record and Fed validation via asset cap removal. Base rate for large-bank new order is ~5-12%; WFC-specific factors suggest slightly above that due to 2016 residual but not materially.

Base rateRemediation track recordResidual variance
haikuRun 2
16%

Low but non-zero. 8-month window captures most of 2026 so any compliance surprise would register.

8-month windowCompliance surprise potential
haikuRun 3
14%

Low probability. WFC is the most-watched large bank from a remediation perspective and has been executing well. No specific known issue in pipeline.

Most-watched bankExecution qualityNo known pipeline issue

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Wells Fargo discloses (via 8-K or quarterly SEC filing) any new consent order, formal agreement, or cease-and-desist order from the Federal Reserve, OCC, CFPB, or DOJ between April 13 2026 and December 31 2026. Resolves NO if no such order is disclosed during that window.

Resolution Source

Wells Fargo 8-K filings, 10-Q filings, regulator announcements

Source Trigger

New regulatory orders from any body are the tail-risk trigger for regulatory exposure

regulatory-readerREGULATORY_EXPOSUREHIGH
View WFC Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis