Back to Forecasting
ABNBActive

Will the Fifth Circuit affirm the New Orleans trial court ruling against Airbnb by end of 2026?

Resolves January 31, 2027(339d)
IG: 0.64

Current Prediction

30%
Likely No
Model Agreement92%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 10, 2026

Why This Question Matters

The New Orleans case tests whether municipalities can require platforms to act as compliance gatekeepers — a novel legal theory with no circuit court precedent. Affirmation would establish binding precedent across Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi and influence similar cases nationwide, materially escalating REGULATORY_EXPOSURE. Reversal would narrow the regulatory toolkit available to cities and suggest limits to the platform liability expansion trend.

REGULATORY_EXPOSURE

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 23%35%Aggregate: 30%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
35%

The trial court's comprehensive rejection (10 of 11 claims) creates a strong appellate record. However, the Section 230 defense receives de novo review at the circuit level. The Fifth Circuit is historically business-friendly, which cuts in Airbnb's favor on Section 230. But the court is also deferential to local government authority on regulatory matters. The timing question is significant: appeal filed after September 2025, briefing typically 3-6 months, then argument, then decision. For a ruling by end of 2026, approximately 15 months from trial ruling to resolution date is plausible but not guaranteed. Estimated ~60% chance court rules within timeframe, ~55% affirmation if reached. Combined: ~0.33.

Timing risk: 15 months may be insufficient for Fifth Circuit appeal resolutionSection 230 de novo review is primary reversal avenue for Airbnb10-of-11 dismissal creates strong appellate record favoring city
opusRun 2
32%

Breaking into components: (A) ~55-65% probability ruling issued by Dec 31, 2026 given Fifth Circuit median appeal-to-decision time of 12-18 months; (B) ~50-55% affirmation conditional on ruling, as the trial court's thorough 10-of-11 dismissal creates strong record but recent judicial trend toward narrowing Section 230 protections is not yet established at circuit level. The Fifth Circuit's dual tendencies -- business-friendly but government-deferential -- create genuine uncertainty on the Section 230 legal question. Combined: ~0.60 * 0.52 = 0.31.

Fifth Circuit median appeal timeline 12-18 months creates meaningful timing riskNovel legal question with no circuit precedent increases uncertaintyFifth Circuit's competing business-friendly and government-deferential tendencies
opusRun 3
23%

The resolution criteria creates asymmetric structure: Airbnb effectively wins (NO) if no ruling is issued OR if ruling is favorable. This stacks odds toward NO. Timing risk alone creates substantial NO probability -- even if merits strongly favor the city, delay resolves NO. Being more conservative on timeline for a complex novel legal question: ~40% probability of ruling by deadline. Conditional on ruling: comprehensive trial court record and trend toward narrowing Section 230 suggests 55% affirmation. Combined: 0.40 * 0.55 = 0.22. Timing risk is the dominant factor deflating YES probability.

Asymmetric resolution: no ruling = NO, creating structural bias toward NOComplex novel legal questions often take longer than typical appealsTiming risk dominates over merits analysis
sonnetRun 1
31%

Two factors dominate: timing and merits. Timing: appeal filed after September 2025, deadline December 31, 2026 -- roughly 15 months maximum. Fifth Circuit dockets vary but 12-18 months for a fully briefed appeal is typical. Novel Section 230 question could be fast-tracked (high public interest) or delayed (careful deliberation). Setting timing at 55%. Merits: trial court demolished Airbnb's case -- 10 of 11 claims dismissed. While Fifth Circuit reviews legal questions de novo, the breadth of rejection suggests robust city legal position. Section 230 faces headwinds from broader trend of narrowing platform immunity. Estimating 55% affirmation if reached. Combined: 0.55 * 0.55 = 0.30.

Trial court dismissed 10 of 11 Airbnb claims -- devastating appellate recordSection 230 narrowing trend favors city but not yet established at circuit level15-month timeline from filing to resolution deadline is plausible but tight
sonnetRun 2
35%

The 10-of-11 dismissal is a powerful signal -- courts that lose on that many claims usually struggle on appeal. The Section 230 de novo review is the primary avenue for reversal, but the current judicial mood toward platform regulation favors narrowing Section 230. On timing, I am moderately optimistic at 60% -- this is a significant case with real regulatory implications and the Fifth Circuit has a reputation for relatively efficient processing. On merits, affirmation at 58%. Combined: 0.60 * 0.58 = 0.35.

10-of-11 dismissal makes successful appeal difficultCurrent judicial mood favors narrowing platform Section 230 protectionsFifth Circuit relatively efficient compared to some other circuits
sonnetRun 3
27%

The Fifth Circuit's dual nature matters enormously. It is the most business-friendly circuit -- historically protective of corporate interests. But it is also fiercely protective of state and local government authority against federal overreach, and Section 230 is a federal statute. This case pits those tendencies directly against each other. The trial court's comprehensive ruling favors affirmation, but the Fifth Circuit's business orientation could lead to a sympathetic hearing for Airbnb's Section 230 arguments. Timing: ~55% ruling by deadline. Merits: ~48% affirmation, giving weight to Fifth Circuit's business-friendly disposition. Combined: 0.55 * 0.48 = 0.26.

Fifth Circuit business-friendly disposition may favor Airbnb on Section 230Local government authority deference may favor city -- competing tendenciesSection 230 as federal statute triggers Fifth Circuit's states-rights instincts
haikuRun 1
29%

Trial court went 10-of-11 against Airbnb -- near-total loss. Appeal timeline of ~15 months is tight for the Fifth Circuit. Timing probability: 55%. Affirmation probability given ruling: 52% (strong trial record but novel legal question with no circuit precedent). Combined: ~0.29.

Near-total trial court loss creates strong appellate record for cityTight appeal timeline at ~15 monthsNovel legal question adds genuine uncertainty
haikuRun 2
25%

Key issue is timing risk. Resolution requires both a ruling AND an affirmation by December 31, 2026. Appeals courts are typically slow. No ruling = NO resolution. The Fifth Circuit is business-friendly, which helps Airbnb on Section 230. But the 10/11 dismissal is hard to overcome on appeal. Timing: 50%. Affirmation if ruling: 50%. Combined: 0.25.

Timing risk is dominant: no ruling by deadline resolves NOBusiness-friendly circuit may be sympathetic to Airbnb10/11 trial court dismissal is hard to overcome on appeal
haikuRun 3
30%

The comprehensive trial court rejection (10/11 claims) establishes strong appellate record favoring the city. Section 230 review is de novo but the trend is toward narrowing platform protections. Fifth Circuit timing is uncertain but 15 months is plausible for this type of case. Estimated 55% timing, 53% affirmation conditional on ruling. Combined: ~0.29.

Strong trial court record favoring city on appealSection 230 narrowing trend supports affirmation15-month appeal window is plausible but uncertain

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals issues a ruling in the Airbnb v. City of New Orleans appeal that substantially affirms the trial court's decision (i.e., upholds the city's authority to require platform compliance verification) by December 31, 2026. Resolves NO if the Fifth Circuit reverses the trial court, remands with instructions favorable to Airbnb, or has not issued a ruling by December 31, 2026.

Resolution Source

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals docket and published opinion via PACER or federal court records

Source Trigger

New Orleans Fifth Circuit appeal ruling

regulatory-readerREGULATORY_EXPOSUREHIGH
View ABNB Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis