Back to Forecasting
AMZNActive

Will AWS year-over-year revenue growth fall below 20% in any two consecutive reported quarters by Q3 2026?

Resolves November 15, 2026(262d)
IG: 0.80

Current Prediction

11%
Likely No
Model Agreement95%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 9, 2026

Why This Question Matters

AWS growth trajectory is the highest-priority monitoring item across all four lenses, affecting five of seven signals. A sustained drop below 20% would validate competitive pressure concerns from the Moat Mapper (share erosion accelerating), confirm Stress Scanner fears about capex ROI, and eliminate the Myth Meter's case that market narrative is overly bearish. Conversely, sustaining 20%+ growth through mid-2026 would strengthen the demand justification for $200B capex and support the DEFENSIBLE moat assessment.

COMPETITIVE_POSITIONCAPITAL_DEPLOYMENTNARRATIVE_REALITY_GAP

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 7%15%Aggregate: 11%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
8%

The base comparison math strongly favors NO. Q1 2025 AWS revenue was $29.3B; even flat sequential from Q4's $35.6B yields ~21.5% YoY growth for Q1 2026. Q2 2025 was $30.9B, so Q2 2026 would need to fall below $37.1B — implausible given the $244B backlog (+40% YoY) and exit ARR of $142B. For two consecutive sub-20% quarters, AWS would need a dramatic reversal of the 17% to 24% acceleration trajectory within one quarter, which neither the Stress Scanner's 15-25% slowdown scenario nor the Azure competitive pressure thesis supports on that timeline.

Easy YoY comparisons for Q1/Q2 2026 make sub-20% nearly impossible for those quarters$244B backlog provides committed revenue floor supporting near-term growthAcceleration from 17% to 24% through 2025 would need dramatic reversal
opusRun 2
12%

The only plausible path to YES is Q2-Q3 2026 consecutive sub-20%, since Q1 comparisons are too easy. Q3 2026 faces the hardest comparison (Q3 2025 was $33.0B, requiring $39.6B+). However, even the Stress Scanner's 'AWS Demand Slowdown' scenario — which envisions growth slowing to 10% — is assigned only 15-25% probability, and that scenario describes a sustained slowdown, not one that must manifest in two specific consecutive quarters. The Q4 reacceleration to 24%, while 'meaningful but not conclusive' per committee consensus, combined with custom silicon at $10B+ ARR with triple-digit growth, provides additional growth momentum that wasn't present during the sub-20% Q1-Q2 2025 period.

Stress Scanner's demand slowdown scenario is only 15-25% and doesn't require specific consecutive quartersQ4 reacceleration plus custom silicon momentum wasn't present during prior sub-20% quartersOnly Q2-Q3 path is plausible; Q1-Q2 path blocked by easy comparisons
opusRun 3
10%

The committee resolved Q4 reacceleration as 'meaningful but not conclusive,' yet the quantitative trajectory (17% -> 17.5% -> 20.2% -> 24%) shows four consecutive quarters of sequential acceleration — this is not noise. The $244B backlog at +40% YoY provides multi-quarter revenue visibility. Even weighting the Azure growth differential (39% vs 24%) and AWS share erosion (~33% to ~29-30%), competitive pressure has been present throughout 2025 and did not prevent the acceleration from Q1's 17% to Q4's 24%. For the question to resolve YES, something genuinely discontinuous would need to occur — a major customer defection or AI efficiency breakthrough — within the next two quarters.

Four consecutive quarters of acceleration is a strong trend, not noiseCompetitive pressure was present throughout 2025 yet didn't prevent accelerationDiscontinuous event needed within 2 quarters for YES — low base rate for such events
sonnetRun 1
14%

While the acceleration trend and easy comparisons make sub-20% unlikely for Q1-Q2 2026, the Azure competitive pressure deserves more weight. Azure is growing at a 15pp differential (39% vs 24%), and AWS market share has declined from ~33% to ~29-30% over three years. AI workloads are the primary growth driver, and Azure's deepening OpenAI integration plus neocloud competition (CoreWeave, Lambda Labs) could fragment AWS's AI revenue. The Q3 2026 comparison against $33.0B (+20.2% in Q3 2025) is the tightest — if growth slows even modestly from 24%, a Q2-Q3 consecutive sub-20% path opens. Still unlikely given backlog, but competitive dynamics warrant higher probability than the base math alone suggests.

Azure 15pp growth differential and market share erosion represent real competitive headwindQ3 2026 comparison against $33.0B is tightest — modest growth slowdown could trigger sub-20%Neocloud competition in AI-specific workloads could fragment AWS's highest-growth segment
sonnetRun 2
11%

The question requires two CONSECUTIVE sub-20% quarters, which is a much higher bar than a single sub-20% quarter. With Q1 2026 comparisons against Q1 2025's $29.3B (17% growth), Q1 2026 is almost certainly above 20% — making Q1-Q2 consecutive failure nearly impossible. The only viable path is Q2-Q3, requiring BOTH to independently fall below 20%. Q2 2025 base of $30.9B (17.5% growth) is also relatively easy. The realistic risk concentrates on Q3 2026 vs Q3 2025's $33.0B (20.2%). Even there, the $244B backlog and $142B ARR run rate provide a strong floor. The 'two consecutive' requirement approximately squares the per-quarter probability.

Two consecutive requirement squares the per-quarter miss probabilityQ1-Q2 path virtually blocked by easy comparisons against 17%/17.5% base quarters$244B backlog and $142B ARR provide strong revenue floor against Q3 comparison
sonnetRun 3
9%

The $244B backlog (+40% YoY, +22% sequential) is the single most dispositive fact. At a conservative 5-year duration, this backlog represents ~$49B in annual committed revenue. With Q4 2025 AWS revenue at $35.6B quarterly ($142B annualized), the backlog alone covers ~35% of the annual run rate. This contracted demand provides a hard floor that makes a growth collapse below 20% extremely unlikely in the near term. Combined with custom silicon momentum ($10B+ ARR, triple-digit growth) and the favorable Q1/Q2 comparisons, the probability of two consecutive sub-20% quarters is firmly in single digits.

$244B backlog covers ~35% of annual run rate — provides hard revenue floorCustom silicon at $10B+ ARR with triple-digit growth adds incremental momentumFavorable Q1/Q2 YoY comparisons make Q1-Q2 consecutive sub-20% virtually impossible
haikuRun 1
15%

AWS growth reaccelerated to 24% in Q4, but market share continues eroding (~33% to ~29-30%) and Azure's 39% growth with OpenAI integration is a structural headwind. A DeepSeek-style AI efficiency breakthrough could materially reduce compute demand. The committee's own CONTESTED minority position holds that sub-20% growth would validate competitive pressure. Assigning modestly higher probability to account for tail risks the committee may be underweighting.

Azure 39% growth with OpenAI integration is structural competitive threatAI efficiency breakthrough risk could reduce compute demand materiallyAWS market share erosion from 33% to 29-30% is an ongoing trend
haikuRun 2
7%

Simple base rate math: Q1 2026 vs Q1 2025 ($29.3B, 17% growth) — AWS at $35.6B Q4 run rate implies ~21%+ growth even with zero sequential growth. Q2 faces similarly easy comparison. Two consecutive sub-20% quarters require growth reversal of 4+ percentage points within 1-2 quarters from a 24% base. Historical AWS growth has never reversed that sharply without a macro recession. Backlog at $244B provides additional floor.

Base comparison math yields 21%+ for Q1 even with zero sequential growthHistorical AWS growth never reversed 4+ points in 1-2 quarters absent recession$244B backlog provides revenue visibility floor
haikuRun 3
13%

The Q4 reacceleration is positive but the committee called it 'meaningful but not conclusive.' AWS share is still declining and Azure is gaining at 2x the rate. If AI workload migration to Azure/GCP accelerates, Q3 2026 (hardest comparison against $33.0B) could fall below 20%, but this would need to follow a sub-20% Q2 as well — which faces an easy comparison. Low probability but not negligible given genuine competitive dynamics.

Q4 reacceleration deemed 'meaningful but not conclusive' by committeeQ3 2026 faces hardest comparison but would need Q2 miss tooAI workload migration to competitors is a real but gradual risk

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Amazon reports AWS segment year-over-year revenue growth below 20% in any two consecutive quarterly earnings releases (Q1 2026 through Q3 2026). Growth is calculated as reported AWS net sales compared to the same quarter in the prior year, per Amazon's quarterly earnings press release. Resolves NO if AWS growth remains at or above 20% in all reported quarters through Q3 2026, or if fewer than two consecutive quarters show sub-20% growth.

Resolution Source

Amazon.com Inc. quarterly earnings press releases and Form 10-Q filings for Q1 2026 through Q3 2026

Source Trigger

AWS revenue growth falls below 20% for 2+ consecutive quarters

moat-mapperCOMPETITIVE_POSITIONHIGH
View AMZN Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis