Back to Forecasting
ASTSActive

Will the FCC approve AST SpaceMobile's Ligado spectrum deal by December 31, 2026?

Resolves December 31, 2026(263d)
IG: 0.48

Current Prediction

18%
Likely No
Model Agreement90%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedMarch 2, 2026

Prediction History

Initial
20%
Feb 8
-2pp
Current
18%
Mar 2
Q4 FY2025 earnings: no Ligado-specific updates

Small decrease from 20% to 18%. Earnings provided zero Ligado-specific information. Management silence on FCC across the board. Ligado's historical 10+ year regulatory challenges, GPS interference concerns, DoD opposition, and dual FCC+bankruptcy court requirement all persist. Time compression (10 months remaining) is mildly negative.

Why This Question Matters

The Ligado spectrum deal ($550M through 2107, $16M/quarter) requires dual FCC and bankruptcy court approval. This is a secondary regulatory gate that compounds the FCC SCS license dependency. Approval would strengthen AST's spectrum moat and competitive position by adding dedicated spectrum resources. Denial would remove a key spectrum strategy element and narrow AST's competitive differentiation against SpaceX's spectrum approach. The deal also has capital implications given the payment obligations.

REGULATORY_EXPOSURECOMPETITIVE_POSITION

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 12%20%Aggregate: 18%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
18%

Q4 FY2025 earnings provided zero new information on Ligado. Management's only FCC reference was a generic 'awaiting FCC approval' in the context of capitalizing spectrum costs — no granularity on Ligado timelines. With 10 months remaining and no process progress visible, the probability ticks marginally lower from the prior 0.20. The GPS interference issue remains unresolved, DoD opposition is institutionally entrenched, and FCC bandwidth is consumed by higher-priority SCS and SpaceX proceedings. The company's strong cash position ($3.9B) and $16M quarterly payments being immaterial is the only softened concern, but that doesn't move the regulatory needle.

Zero Ligado-specific updates in Q4 earnings — no process progress signalGPS interference is a technical barrier that persists across administrationsDoD institutional opposition has historically been sufficient to block approval unilaterallyFCC bandwidth consumed by SCS and SpaceX proceedings — Ligado is lower priority
opusRun 2
20%

Holding near the prior estimate of 0.20. The earnings silence on Ligado is consistent with no progress but also with a quiet processing period at the FCC. Whether the current FCC composition is more favorable to Ligado remains unknown — this is an explicit uncertainty from the committee analysis and still unresolved. The Trump-era FCC could theoretically move faster on spectrum deregulation, and the Ligado deal's benefit to a US space-tech company may carry some political weight. But there is no concrete evidence of this materializing, and the GPS/DoD opposition transcends politics. Maintaining 0.20 as the most defensible estimate.

FCC composition and political favorability toward Ligado still explicitly unknownGPS interference is bipartisan and tied to national security — transcends politicsNo earnings signal either direction — silence is weakly negative given time compressionTrump-era spectrum deregulation posture is a residual upside scenario
opusRun 3
17%

Ligado ranked #9 of 12 monitoring triggers within AST's own internal priority ordering. Management's Q4 call contained no Ligado mention whatsoever — consistent with a regulatory process that is not actively advancing. With only 10 months remaining against a dispute that has accumulated 10+ years of entrenchment, the conditional probability of resolution this year decreases modestly with each passing quarter of silence. FCC is simultaneously handling the SCS license (higher priority) and SpaceX's complaint. Institutional bandwidth constraints compound with complexity constraints. Marginal downward drift from prior 0.20 is warranted.

Ligado is #9 of 12 priority triggers — company itself treats this as secondaryFCC institutional bandwidth consumed by higher-priority, more novel proceedings10 months remaining against a 10+ year entrenched disputeQuarterly silence is weakly negative Bayesian update
sonnetRun 1
19%

The Q4 earnings update is a clean null result for Ligado: no updates from management, no FCC developments disclosed, no bankruptcy court news. This is a weakly negative signal given time compression — each month of silence is a month not progressing toward approval. The structural picture is unchanged: dual approval requirement (FCC + bankruptcy court), GPS interference unresolved, DoD opposition entrenched, FCC processing higher-priority SCS and SpaceX items. A marginal pullback from 0.22 to 0.19 reflects the null update combined with 3-4 fewer weeks of runway.

Null earnings update is weakly negative — silence means no progressDual approval requirement adds institutional complexity beyond FCC aloneStructural barriers (GPS interference, DoD opposition) unchanged and unresolved3-4 fewer weeks of runway than prior batch
sonnetRun 2
18%

The FCC may be reluctant to approve a spectrum arrangement when Ligado's corporate structure remains uncertain in bankruptcy. Even if GPS interference concerns were somehow resolved, the FCC might hold approval pending clarity on which entity would actually hold and operate the spectrum post-restructuring. The bankruptcy proceeding and FCC proceeding are legally independent but practically intertwined — the FCC granting approval to a company in a contested restructuring creates regulatory uncertainty about enforcement and spectrum management. This dual-proceeding entanglement adds a practical delay layer that wasn't resolved by Q4 earnings.

FCC likely hesitant to approve spectrum transfer when Ligado's post-bankruptcy corporate structure is unresolvedDual-proceeding entanglement (FCC + bankruptcy court) persists with no updateEven a GPS-clean approval scenario faces structural timing issues from bankruptcy uncertaintyNo management commentary suggests active engagement on either proceeding
sonnetRun 3
15%

DoD opposition to L-band spectrum utilization has been the decisive blocking factor across multiple Ligado/LightSquared proceedings since at least 2012. This opposition is rooted in GPS interference with critical military navigation systems — a genuinely technical concern that is not easily resolved by political pressure or administrative priority shifts. With DoD still likely opposed (no evidence of any resolution) and the FCC unlikely to override DoD on GPS/national security grounds, the dominant signal remains strong toward NO. The earnings null is consistent with this assessment. 0.15 reflects DoD opposition as the primary constraint.

DoD opposition has been decisive across multiple proceedings since 2012Military GPS interference is a genuine technical concern not solvable by politicsFCC has historically not overridden DoD on national security spectrum groundsNo evidence of GPS interference resolution or DoD position change
haikuRun 1
18%

Q4 earnings: zero Ligado signal. FCC: silent. Bankruptcy court: silent. DoD: no position change evident. GPS interference: unresolved. Ten months remain on a decade-old regulatory dispute. Prior batch was 0.20. Marginal downward drift to 0.18 on time compression and null update.

Zero new signal from Q4 earnings or FCC10 months remaining versus decade-old disputeAll structural barriers persist unchangedTime compression with no progress is weakly negative
haikuRun 2
12%

Base rate anchoring: LightSquared/Ligado has been trying to commercialize L-band spectrum since 2011. Multiple FCC proceedings across multiple administrations have all failed. The historical base rate for contested L-band approvals with active DoD opposition is effectively zero. Even with some allowance for a new political environment or technical mitigation, the base rate pulls strongly toward 0.10-0.15. Q4 earnings null update provides no reason to move away from the base rate. Maintaining 0.12.

Historical base rate for contested L-band approvals with DoD opposition is near zeroLightSquared/Ligado failures span 2011-2026 across multiple administrationsQ4 null update provides no reason to deviate from base rateRegime-change upside scenario lacks any concrete supporting evidence
haikuRun 3
14%

Ten months remaining. Decade of regulatory failure. DoD opposed. GPS interference unresolved. FCC busy with higher-priority items. Ligado in bankruptcy. Q4 earnings added nothing. Simple assessment: low probability, marginally lower than prior batch of 0.15 on reduced runway and null update.

Only 10 months for decade-old regulatory dispute to resolveMultiple structural barriers remain unresolved with no new informationFCC priorities lie elsewhere — SCS and SpaceX proceedings are higher priorityReduced runway from prior batch with zero countervailing positive signal

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if the FCC grants approval (full or conditional) for AST SpaceMobile's Ligado spectrum arrangement by December 31, 2026. FCC approval alone is sufficient for YES resolution — bankruptcy court approval is a separate process. Resolves NO if the FCC has not granted approval by that date, regardless of whether the application is pending, withdrawn, or denied.

Resolution Source

FCC public records and orders, AST SpaceMobile SEC filings (8-K), company press releases

Source Trigger

Ligado spectrum deal — FCC + bankruptcy court dual approval

regulatory-readerREGULATORY_EXPOSUREHIGH
View ASTS Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis