Will SpaceX demonstrate broadband direct-to-device service (>5 Mbps downlink to unmodified phone) by December 31, 2026?
Current Prediction
Why This Question Matters
SpaceX's broadband D2D capability is the central competitive uncertainty. Currently SpaceX has 600+ D2D satellites but only demonstrated text/narrowband service. AST's technology moat depends on broadband being physics-constrained (requiring large phased arrays that SpaceX satellites lack). If SpaceX demonstrates >5 Mbps D2D to unmodified phones, it would collapse AST's primary competitive differentiation and escalate the CONTESTED position toward ERODING. Non-demonstration preserves AST's technology advantage thesis.
Prediction Distribution
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
Physics fundamentally constrains broadband D2D to unmodified phones — consumer phones have fixed, low-power antennas requiring large satellite-side aperture to close the link budget. AST's ~2,400 sq ft array achieves >14 Mbps; SpaceX's 600+ D2D satellites use narrowband-optimized architecture. The committee concluded upgrading to broadband requires different satellite hardware, not software updates. Designing, building, launching, and demonstrating a new broadband-capable satellite within ~10 months is extremely challenging given these physics constraints.
SpaceX has demonstrated extraordinary satellite iteration speed (v1 to v2 to v3) and has unmatched resources. The CRITICAL data gap on SpaceX's D2D satellite design roadmap means stealth broadband development cannot be ruled out. However, the committee confirmed current fleet cannot do broadband, and the gap from narrowband to broadband is a hardware generation leap. Even for SpaceX, designing and demonstrating broadband-capable D2D satellites in ~10 months is aggressive, though their engineering capability warrants non-trivial probability.
Multi-satellite coordination and beam concentration represent SpaceX's most plausible path to >5 Mbps without per-satellite large aperture — the context explicitly flags this as a key risk. If multiple satellites coordinate beams on a single handset, effective aperture increases. However, consumer phone antenna gain remains the bottleneck on uplink regardless of beam concentration, and the resolution requires downlink >5 Mbps to an unmodified phone. This approach is theoretically viable but unproven and would require sophisticated coordination technology that SpaceX has not demonstrated.
Weighing all factors: SpaceX's 600+ D2D satellites are narrowband-only, physics favors AST's large-aperture approach, and three independent lenses confirm SpaceX broadband D2D is unproven. The CRITICAL data gap on SpaceX's roadmap introduces uncertainty, but the base of known facts points strongly to narrowband-only current capability. AST's CTO 94.4% divestiture is concerning but ambiguous. With ~10 months remaining, the base case is SpaceX does not demonstrate broadband D2D by end of 2026.
Publicly known: SpaceX has 600+ narrowband D2D satellites, FCC SCS license (Dec 2025), T-Mobile texting partnership. Unknown (CRITICAL gap): SpaceX's satellite design roadmap, any stealth broadband development, next-gen satellite specs. Resolution requires PUBLIC demonstration — even internal capability must be disclosed. The base of known facts points to narrowband-only capability with no public indication of broadband D2D progress. The large unknowns prevent very low probability but known facts strongly favor NO.
SpaceX and T-Mobile have strong commercial incentives to demonstrate broadband D2D — it would establish market dominance and collapse AST's differentiation. The FCC SCS license (Dec 2025) enables commercial service. However, commercial incentives cannot overcome physics constraints — if the hardware is not ready, incentives are irrelevant. SpaceX may also prefer to perfect technology before announcing publicly. The incentive structure supports eventual pursuit of broadband D2D but does not meaningfully accelerate the ~10 month timeline.
Current SpaceX D2D is narrowband only. Broadband requires different satellite hardware with larger antenna. ~10 months is short for satellite redesign, launch, and public demonstration. CRITICAL data gap on SpaceX roadmap adds uncertainty but known facts strongly favor NO.
Satellite capability advances over multi-year cycles. Starlink v1 to v2 took approximately 2 years. Going from narrowband to broadband D2D is a generation leap requiring new antenna technology. Historical satellite tech timelines suggest 2-4 year development cycles for major capability upgrades. Even SpaceX's speed cannot compress this to ~10 months.
SpaceX currently cannot do broadband D2D. They need new hardware and have ~10 months. Even with SpaceX's extraordinary engineering speed, this is unlikely in the timeframe. Not impossible due to CRITICAL data gap on stealth development, but base rate for this kind of capability leap in this timeframe is low.
Resolution Criteria
Resolves YES if by December 31, 2026, SpaceX, T-Mobile, or a credible third party (FCC filing, independent test, major publication) publicly demonstrates or discloses that SpaceX's Starlink D2D satellites have achieved downlink data speeds exceeding 5 Mbps to a standard unmodified consumer mobile phone (not a specialized device). Resolves NO if no such demonstration or disclosure has occurred by that date, regardless of SpaceX's internal capabilities.
Resolution Source
SpaceX/T-Mobile press releases, FCC filings, independent speed tests published by credible sources (e.g., Ookla, PCMag, Anandtech), SEC filings
Source Trigger
SpaceX demonstrates broadband D2D (>5 Mbps to unmodified phone)
Full multi-lens equity analysis