Back to Forecasting
BRK.BActive

Will Berkshire Hathaway announce or close a major acquisition (>$10B enterprise value) under Greg Abel's leadership by year-end 2026?

Resolves January 31, 2027(339d)
IG: 0.80

Current Prediction

23%
Likely No
Model Agreement94%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 14, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Abel's deal-sourcing capability is the primary untested element of institutional moat transferability, identified by 4 of 6 lenses. A major acquisition would demonstrate the Berkshire deal-making machine functions post-Buffett and de-escalate the 'Governance Vacuum' compound scenario. Continued inaction through 2026 would sustain the cash drag narrative (NARRATIVE_REALITY_GAP), support bears' 'savings account with conglomerate attached' framing, and leave institutional moat transferability at E1 evidence.

COMPETITIVE_POSITIONNARRATIVE_REALITY_GAPGOVERNANCE_ALIGNMENT

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 20%28%Aggregate: 23%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
25%

Base rate for Berkshire major acquisition in any year is roughly 25% (one every 3-5 years). Abel has 10.5 months remaining in 2026 with $381.6B in cash -- the largest corporate war chest in history. However, Buffett himself couldn't find a deal in 2025 despite wanting to deploy, and Abel's deal-sourcing capability is entirely untested at E1 evidence. The $10B threshold is achievable (Alleghany was $11.6B in 2022), but Abel's stated 'identical philosophy' means he won't force deployment. The Berkshire culture explicitly rejects acquisitions for the sake of action.

Base rate ~25% for major Berkshire acquisition in any yearAbel untested at E1 evidence for deal-sourcingBuffett couldn't deploy in 2025 despite identical cash position
opusRun 2
22%

Supply constraint is binding: the universe of private companies with $10B+ EV that Berkshire could acquire is extremely small. Most targets at that scale are public, requiring significant premiums. Berkshire doesn't do hostile bids, so targets must come willingly. Abel's $4.3B Google purchase shows comfort with public equities but the question excludes minority stakes. No recession or market dislocation is evident as of February 2026 that would create the kind of distressed opportunities Berkshire historically capitalizes on. The net equity selling posture in 2025 suggests Berkshire views the market as expensive.

Narrow universe of willing $10B+ acquisition targetsNo market dislocation to create distressed opportunitiesNet equity selling in 2025 signals expensive market view
opusRun 3
28%

Acknowledging possibility of behind-the-scenes activity: major acquisitions take months of negotiation, and Berkshire has historically moved quickly once terms are agreed (Alleghany announced weeks after initial contact). Abel may already be in discussions. Year 1 as CEO creates implicit pressure to demonstrate capital allocation capability -- the Moat Mapper, Myth Meter, and Black Swan Beacon all identified this as a critical de-escalation trigger. However, zero insider purchases and the 'identical philosophy' commitment constrain forced action. The $10B threshold (lower than the $20B monitoring trigger) makes this slightly more achievable than the monitoring trigger implies.

Possible behind-the-scenes negotiations not visible in public dataYear 1 CEO pressure to demonstrate deal capability$10B threshold lower than $20B monitoring trigger -- more achievable
sonnetRun 1
23%

The facts are clear: Abel is 45 days into his role with $381.6B in cash, but Buffett -- the greatest capital allocator in history -- couldn't deploy in all of 2025 with the same war chest. Abel's operational background at BHE (utility management) is fundamentally different from deal-sourcing. His deal-sourcing capability is rated E1 (lowest evidence level). Base rate ~25% adjusted down for new CEO learning curve and elevated valuations, partially offset by massive cash pile creating deployment pressure and the lower $10B threshold.

Buffett couldn't find deals in 2025 with same cash pileAbel's operational background differs from deal-sourcing expertiseE1 evidence level for institutional moat transferability
sonnetRun 2
20%

The probability path to YES requires either: (a) a recession creating distressed opportunities, (b) a private company approaching Berkshire (as Alleghany did in 2022), or (c) Abel lowering Buffett's valuation standards. Option (c) would be disastrous for Berkshire's brand and highly unlikely in year 1. Options (a) and (b) are exogenous events with low individual probability in any given 10-month window. Buffett explicitly stated 'things don't come along in an orderly fashion,' and the lack of any insider buying suggests no imminent catalyst. Todd Combs' departure to JPMorgan further reduces deal-sourcing bandwidth.

YES requires exogenous catalyst (recession or inbound deal approach)Abel lowering standards in year 1 highly unlikelyCombs departure reduces deal-sourcing bandwidth
sonnetRun 3
27%

10.5 months is a meaningful timeframe -- a lot can happen in markets. The $10B threshold is achievable: Berkshire could acquire a large utility, railroad-adjacent business, or industrial company where Abel has deep expertise from his BHE background. Abel's operational knowledge of energy/utility assets might make him MORE likely to acquire in sectors he understands well compared to Buffett's broader capital allocation approach. Berkshire's reputation means deals come to them. However, no deal pipeline is disclosed, the net selling posture continues, and Abel has explicitly prioritized internal opportunities first.

10.5 months provides meaningful timeframe for deal emergenceAbel's BHE expertise could drive energy/utility sector acquisitionsBerkshire reputation means inbound deal flow continues
haikuRun 1
22%

Berkshire does ~1 major deal every 3-5 years. Last was Alleghany in 2022. 2025 had zero acquisitions. Base rate ~25% adjusted down ~3% for new CEO uncertainty and elevated market valuations, partially offset by massive cash pile creating deployment pressure.

Historical frequency: ~1 major deal per 3-5 yearsLast deal was 2022 Alleghany; 2025 had zeroNew CEO uncertainty reduces near-term deal probability
haikuRun 2
20%

Abel is an operator, not a deal-maker. His background is running BHE utilities, not sourcing transformative acquisitions. Market valuations remain elevated with no recession signal. Berkshire's discipline means they wait for 'fat pitches.' The 10.5 months remaining provides time but the structural barriers (narrow target universe, elevated prices, untested deal-sourcing) outweigh the timeframe advantage.

Abel's operational background vs. deal-sourcing expertise gapElevated market valuations limit attractive targetsBerkshire 'fat pitch' discipline constrains forced deployment
haikuRun 3
24%

$381.6B cash pile creates implicit deployment pressure and Abel may want to prove himself in year 1. But Buffett couldn't find deals in 2025 and Abel has less experience. Base rate minus new CEO discount, slightly offset by the lower $10B threshold and Abel's potential motivation to demonstrate capital allocation capability.

$381.6B cash creates deployment pressureBuffett couldn't deploy in 2025 with same resourcesAbel may be motivated to prove capital allocation in year 1

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Berkshire Hathaway announces or closes an acquisition with enterprise value exceeding $10 billion at any point during calendar year 2026, as disclosed in an 8-K filing, press release, or Berkshire annual report. Joint ventures, minority stakes, and public equity purchases do not count -- must be an acquisition of a business or controlling stake. Resolves NO if no such acquisition is announced or closed by December 31, 2026.

Resolution Source

Berkshire Hathaway SEC filings (8-K, 10-K), press releases, and FY2026 annual report

Source Trigger

Abel's first major acquisition (>$20B deployed)

moat-mapperCOMPETITIVE_POSITIONHIGH
View BRK.B Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis