Will CAVA achieve full-year FY2026 restaurant-level profit margin above 23%?
Current Prediction
Why This Question Matters
Restaurant-level profit margin of 23.7-24.2% guided for FY2026 after 21.4% in Q4. Achieving above 23% validates that unit economics scale with growth. Below 22% for consecutive quarters would signal structural compression.
Prediction Distribution
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
Guided 23.7-24.2% but Q4 was only 21.4%. The step-up requires Q2-Q3 seasonal strength to pull the annual average above 23%. FY2025 full-year was ~23.5% suggesting the annual cadence supports above 23%. Tariff headwinds on food costs (~50bps) create modest risk. Around 58%.
Management has guided conservatively and delivered. KDS and TurboChef improve throughput. But labor costs and food inflation create headwinds. The 23% threshold is at the lower end of guidance. Around 57%.
Management's operational track record is strong. 23% is below the guided midpoint of ~24%. Seasonal patterns strongly favor H1 improvement. Conservative pricing provides a margin lever. Around 60%.
Q4 at 21.4% needs significant improvement. Seasonal and pricing levers available. Tariffs add uncertainty. Around 57%.
Tariff headwinds on food costs could be larger than the 50bps estimate. Labor cost pressure in tight markets. But management has operational credibility. Around 55%.
FY2025 was ~23.5% and FY2026 guidance is 23.7-24.2%. Below guided range threshold. Seasonal strength ahead. Around 60%.
Achievable based on FY2025 precedent and seasonal patterns. Tariff risk exists. Around 58%.
Food cost inflation and tariffs create headwinds. But operator quality is high. Around 55%.
Below guided range. Seasonal support. Management track record. Around 58%.
Resolution Criteria
Resolves YES if full-year FY2026 restaurant-level profit margin exceeds 23.0%. Resolves NO if 23.0% or below.
Resolution Source
CAVA FY2026 earnings release
Source Trigger
Q4 RLP margin 21.4%; guided 23.7-24.2% FY2026; below 22% for consecutive quarters signals compression
Full multi-lens equity analysis