Back to Forecasting
CFActive

Will the 45Q carbon sequestration tax credit be reduced or repealed by US legislation before January 2027?

Resolves January 15, 2027(281d)
IG: 0.48

Current Prediction

12%
Likely No
Model Agreement95%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedApril 9, 2026

Why This Question Matters

The Regulatory Reader found CF has an inverted regulatory risk profile — it benefits from policy more than it is threatened by it. 45Q credits contribute ~$127M/year. If 45Q is reduced or repealed, it damages Blue Point economics and removes a clean energy premium. If 45Q survives, CF's regulatory tailwinds remain intact and the MANAGEABLE classification holds.

REGULATORY_EXPOSURECOMPETITIVE_POSITION

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 10%18%Aggregate: 12%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
12%

45Q has notable bipartisan support because CCS benefits fossil fuel-producing states (Louisiana, Texas, Wyoming) that are politically important. The credit was originally enacted in 2008 (Bush administration) and expanded in the IRA. Repealing or reducing 45Q specifically would face opposition from Republican-leaning states where CCS projects are concentrated. While the IRA faces political headwinds broadly, 45Q is one of the most politically durable provisions. Legislative action requires both chambers and presidential signature — even with a motivated majority, the legislative timeline makes action before January 2027 tight. I estimate 12%.

Bipartisan support in fossil fuel statesOriginally enacted under Bush (2008), predates IRALegislative timeline makes pre-2027 action tight
opusRun 2
15%

The political risk to 45Q is real but probably manifests through administrative narrowing (Treasury guidance) rather than legislative repeal. However, the question specifically asks about legislation — Treasury guidance changes wouldn't resolve YES. For legislative action: budget reconciliation is the most likely vehicle, and 45Q could be caught in a broader IRA rollback package. The risk of a partial modification (e.g., reducing to $50/ton from $85/ton) is higher than full repeal. But even a partial modification through legislation before January 2027 requires fast legislative action that hasn't yet been introduced. I bump slightly above base because the political environment is genuinely hostile to clean energy subsidies in some quarters.

Administrative narrowing more likely than legislative repealBudget reconciliation is the vehiclePartial modification risk higher than full repeal
opusRun 3
10%

45Q is fundamentally different from other IRA provisions because it supports carbon capture — a technology championed by fossil fuel industries and their political allies. The Western Governors' Association, major oil companies, and industrial unions all support 45Q. Any legislation targeting 45Q would face opposition from the most powerful lobbying groups in Washington. Furthermore, projects worth billions have been committed based on 45Q — retroactive reduction would face legal challenges. The political economy strongly protects this specific credit. I'm at 10% — lower than peers.

Fossil fuel industry actively supports 45QBillions committed based on credit — retroactive change faces legal riskPolitical economy strongly protects CCS credits
sonnetRun 1
12%

45Q has been described as the 'most bipartisan' part of the IRA. Even politicians who oppose the IRA broadly tend to support CCS provisions. The credit benefits companies in red states and blue states alike. Legislative repeal would need to overcome industry opposition, bipartisan congressional support, and potential legal challenges from companies with reliance interest. The probability of legislative reduction before January 2027 is low — about 12%.

Most bipartisan IRA provisionIndustry opposition to repealReliance interest legal protection
sonnetRun 2
18%

I am more cautious than peers. The current political environment includes active efforts to roll back IRA provisions through budget reconciliation. While 45Q has bipartisan support, it could be reduced as part of a broader package deal — 'sacrificed' to achieve other political goals. The risk is not a targeted 45Q repeal but a broader IRA modification that includes 45Q reduction as a concession. In the horse-trading of budget reconciliation, bipartisan support for 45Q may not be sufficient if it's bundled with other provisions. I put this at 18% — still unlikely but with more political uncertainty than peers acknowledge.

Could be reduced as part of broader IRA package dealBudget reconciliation horse-trading riskBipartisan support may not protect in bundle scenario
sonnetRun 3
13%

The legislative clock is the key constraint. Even if there were political will to modify 45Q, passing legislation through both chambers and getting a presidential signature before January 2027 requires starting NOW. No such legislation has been introduced targeting 45Q specifically. Budget reconciliation targeting IRA more broadly might include 45Q modifications, but the timeline from introduction through CBO scoring through committee through floor votes through conference is typically 6-12 months. Starting from current position, January 2027 is tight. 13% probability.

Legislative clock is the binding constraintNo 45Q-specific legislation introduced6-12 month typical legislative timeline
haikuRun 1
10%

45Q is bipartisan, supported by fossil fuel industry. Legislative repeal before Jan 2027 requires fast action that hasn't started. Very unlikely. About 10%.

Bipartisan supportNo legislation introducedTight timeline
haikuRun 2
13%

Political environment hostile to clean energy broadly. But 45Q is CCS, which is fossil fuel-compatible. Could be caught in broader IRA rollback but unlikely to be targeted. About 13%.

CCS is fossil fuel-compatibleCould be caught in broader rollbackUnlikely to be specifically targeted
haikuRun 3
11%

Bipartisan credit, industry support, tight legislative timeline. 45Q repeal is one of the least likely IRA provisions to be modified. About 11%.

Least likely IRA provision to be modifiedStrong industry lobbyInsufficient time for legislative action

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if US federal legislation is enacted before January 1, 2027 that reduces the 45Q credit rate below $85/ton for industrial CCS or repeals the credit entirely. Resolves NO if the 45Q credit remains at $85/ton or higher through year-end 2026.

Resolution Source

Congressional legislation tracked via congress.gov and IRS guidance

Source Trigger

45Q/45V/CBAM policy stability — Any modification to IRA provisions or EU carbon policy

regulatory-readerREGULATORY_EXPOSUREHIGH
View CF Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis