Back to Forecasting
CLFActive

Will US HRC steel prices average above $800/ton through H1 2026?

Resolves July 31, 2026(72d)
IG: 0.64

Current Prediction

87%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement96%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedApril 21, 2026

Prediction History

Initial
52%
Apr 5
+35pp
Current
87%
Apr 21
Q1 2026 earnings update (2026-04-21)

CLF Q1 ASP reached $1,048/ton with Q2 guided to $1,108/ton — implies Midwest HRC in $850-950 range. Imports at 2009 lows, melted-and-poured enforcement deepening, derivative transformer tariffs added. Q1 data effectively resolves pricing uncertainty for H1 average. Ensemble moved from 0.52 to 0.87.

Why This Question Matters

HRC pricing is the single most important external variable for CLF's commodity business (94-97% of revenue). With ~50:1 operating leverage, the difference between $700/ton and $900/ton HRC translates to hundreds of millions in EBITDA. Sustained pricing above $800 would support the recovery thesis; below $700 would stress the balance sheet within 18-24 months regardless of other catalysts.

REVENUE_DURABILITYFUNDING_FRAGILITY

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 84%90%Aggregate: 87%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
88%

CLF's Q1 2026 ASP reached $1,048/ton, Q2 guided to $1,108. Even with CLF's typical premium to Midwest HRC spot (from auto and coated product mix), the implied underlying Midwest HRC in Q1 is comfortably above $800/ton — likely in the $850-950 range given typical CLF-to-HRC spreads. Imports at 2009 lows and melted-and-poured enforcement deepening are fundamentally supply-constraining. Q2 pricing guide further up implies HRC is accelerating, not fading. For the H1 average to fall below $800 would require Q1 to be well below $800 — which is inconsistent with CLF's reported ASP. This is essentially resolved in favor of YES barring data series methodology issues.

CLF Q1 ASP $1,048, Q2 guide $1,108 — implies underlying HRC well above $800Imports at 2009 lows — structural supply constraintMelted-and-poured enforcement deepening
opusRun 2
86%

Midwest HRC prices in Q1 2026 were running in the $850-900 range per industry reports (consistent with CLF's $1,048 ASP with ~$150 product-mix premium). Q2 is tracking higher. For the H1 average to land below $800 would require a sharp reversal in the remaining weeks of Q2 — possible but inconsistent with Q2 guidance still up. Residual risk: demand shock (recession) or tariff modification mid-quarter. Both tail risks are real but not baseline expectations. Price around 86% — very likely YES but not certain.

Q1 Midwest HRC ~$850-900 per industry trackersQ2 guidance continues upwardOnly tail risks (recession, tariff mod) threaten YES
opusRun 3
90%

The math is straightforward. Q1 HRC Midwest averaged comfortably above $800 based on CLF's $1,048 ASP with normal mix adjustments. Q2 guidance points higher. Even if Q2 landed exactly at $800, the Q1 overshoot would carry the H1 average. The resolution criterion is average for H1 (Jan-Jun) above $800/ton. Unless there's a catastrophic demand collapse in May-June, this resolves YES. Probability ~90%.

Q1 already well above $800 — H1 average math carriesQ2 guidance reinforcesCatastrophic demand collapse needed to flip
sonnetRun 1
87%

CLF's reported ASP of $1,048 in Q1 and guidance of $1,108 for Q2 translates to an implied Midwest HRC spot in the $800-900 range for Q1 and higher for Q2. Tariff environment is the strongest in years — Section 232 at 25% with derivatives added, pig iron tariffs functional, imports at 2009 lows. The primary risk is methodology discrepancy between Steel Benchmarker/CRU indices and CLF's realized pricing. But even with a $100 downward adjustment, Q1 HRC is comfortably above $800. Lean strongly YES at 87%.

CLF ASP $1,048 implies Midwest HRC $850+Tariff environment strongest in yearsImports at 2009 lows constrain supply
sonnetRun 2
84%

I'll flag some conservatism: CLF's ASP includes significant coated, auto-grade, and plate premium over base HRC. Typical spread is $100-200 over Midwest HRC spot. So $1,048 ASP implies Midwest HRC in the $850-950 range, which is well above $800. However, the question asks about the average for H1 — if Q2 weakens unexpectedly in June, the tail risk is real. Still very likely YES at around 84%.

CLF ASP has $100-200 premium over Midwest HRCQ2 weakness in June is the primary tail riskStill strongly positive
sonnetRun 3
88%

The baseline was 52% because Q1 data hadn't landed. Now Q1 is in: CLF's ASP of $1,048 and the fact that imports are at 2009 lows removes most of the downside risk on H1 HRC pricing. Q2 guide up reinforces. Probability should move decisively up — to 88%.

Baseline 52% was pre-Q1 dataQ1 actuals resolve most uncertaintyQ2 guide reinforces
haikuRun 1
87%

CLF Q1 ASP $1,048, Q2 guide $1,108 — HRC is well supported. Tariff environment strong. H1 average above $800 is very likely.

Q1 ASP well above thresholdQ2 guide higherTariffs supportive
haikuRun 2
85%

Strong Q1 pricing data, guidance continues up. Primary risk is H1 methodology (Jan-Jun average). Q1 overshoot likely carries. Around 85%.

Strong Q1 dataGuidance upQ1 overshoot carries H1 average
haikuRun 3
86%

Pricing moved from uncertain to resolved-ish. Q1 clearly above $800, Q2 guide above $800. Only late-Q2 shock could drop the average. 86%.

Q1 clearly above $800Q2 guide above $800Only late-Q2 shock threatens

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if the average Midwest HRC spot price (as reported by Steel Benchmarker, CRU, or equivalent) exceeds $800/short ton for the period January 1 through June 30, 2026. Resolves NO if the average is $800/ton or below.

Resolution Source

Steel Benchmarker weekly spot price reports or CRU HRC price index

Source Trigger

HRC pricing trajectory — sustained above $800 required for EBITDA recovery

gravy-gaugeREVENUE_DURABILITYHIGH
View CLF Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis