Back to Forecasting
COMPActive

Will Compass's annualized stock-based compensation decline to $150M or below by Q3 2026?

Resolves December 15, 2026(250d)
IG: 0.48

Current Prediction

6%
Likely No
Model Agreement96%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 26, 2026

Prediction History

Initial
22%
Feb 8
-16pp
Current
6%
Feb 26
Q4 2025 earnings: CEO committed <$50M/quarter SBC — above $37.5M threshold

CEO's explicit forward guidance of <$50M/quarter ($200M annualized) is $50M above the $150M threshold. Management's own commitment does not reach the market's threshold. Trailing 4Q path is mathematically impossible. Sharp downward revision from 22% to 6%.

Why This Question Matters

SBC of $200-240M annualized exceeds Adjusted EBITDA of $126M (FY2024), creating a material GAAP/adjusted gap flagged by both the Consolidation Calibrator and Myth Meter. The Myth Meter classified profitability framing as DIVERGING — 'record profitability' claims exclude SBC that is larger than the adjusted profit itself. This market tests whether the trajectory (Q2 2025 showed improvement) continues. Meaningful SBC decline would narrow the narrative-reality gap and support a potential upgrade. Persistence would confirm the DIVERGING classification is durable.

NARRATIVE_REALITY_GAPACCOUNTING_INTEGRITY

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 5%8%Aggregate: 6%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
6%

The CEO's own forward guidance is the most informative data point here. He committed to <$50M per quarter starting Q2 2026 — which annualizes to ~$200M, a full $50M above the $150M threshold. The market question requires Q3 2026 SBC x 4 <= $150M, meaning Q3 SBC must be ≤$37.5M. The CEO didn't commit to $37.5M; he committed to <$50M. This means management itself does not expect to reach the threshold. Adding Anywhere's legacy SBC obligations makes it even more difficult. For this to resolve YES, the CEO would need to dramatically outperform his own commitment — cutting SBC by an additional 25% beyond what he promised. While possible if there's aggressive restructuring of equity comp programs, this runs counter to the need to retain talent during integration. The only plausible path is if 'SBC' in the resolution criteria excludes Anywhere legacy programs, but the question appears to cover the combined entity.

CEO committed to <$50M/quarter ($200M annualized) — $50M above the $150M thresholdQ3 2026 SBC must be ≤$37.5M — CEO gave no indication this is achievableAnywhere legacy SBC programs add incremental cost to combined entity
opusRun 2
8%

There is an important subtlety in the resolution criteria: 'YES if Q3 2026 SBC x 4 <= $150M, or trailing 4Q SBC <= $150M.' The trailing 4Q option includes Q4 2025 ($57.5M) + Q1 2026 + Q2 2026 + Q3 2026. If Q4 2025 is $57.5M and Q1 includes a one-time change-of-control severance charge, the trailing 4Q sum could be $57.5M + $65M (Q1 with severance) + $48M (Q2 per CEO's <$50M) + $45M (Q3 further normalization) = $215M — still well above $150M. The trailing 4Q path is actually harder than the single-quarter path because it includes the elevated Q4 2025 and likely elevated Q1 2026 with merger-related charges. This market is very likely to resolve NO. The only scenario for YES involves a dramatic accounting reclassification that moves SBC costs to a different line item.

Trailing 4Q path includes elevated Q4 2025 ($57.5M) and likely elevated Q1 2026One-time change-of-control severance in Q1 2026 inflates the trailing sum furtherEven the single-quarter path requires $37.5M — 25% below CEO's own commitment
opusRun 3
5%

Working through every plausible scenario: (1) CEO overdelivers on SBC reduction — committed to <$50M but achieves $37.5M. This requires a 34% cut from Q4's $57.5M, versus the ~13% cut to $50M he committed to. Possible only with radical equity comp restructuring that risks agent/employee attrition during integration. (2) Accounting reclassification moves some SBC to other categories. Unlikely to be material enough to close the gap. (3) Anywhere SBC somehow offsets through program termination. Would require immediate cessation of Anywhere equity programs — likely creating legal/retention issues. (4) Housing market collapse reduces headcount and therefore SBC. Would help SBC but also destroy the business. None of these scenarios have meaningful probability. The CEO's own guidance effectively caps the ceiling above the threshold.

No plausible scenario bridges the $12.5M/quarter gap between CEO commitment and thresholdAggressive SBC cuts during integration create retention risk — counterproductiveCombined entity SBC includes both Compass and Anywhere programs
sonnetRun 1
7%

Base rate: CEO said <$50M/quarter from Q2 2026. Threshold requires ≤$37.5M/quarter. The gap is $12.5M per quarter, or 25% below management's own target. FY2024 standalone was ~$130M ($32.5M/quarter average), which is below the threshold — but that was before the merger added Anywhere's SBC and before the Q3/Q4 2025 spike. The trend line is wrong: Q4 2025 was $57.5M, management is guiding to <$50M, and the threshold needs $37.5M. Even if we see a linear decline from $57.5M → $50M → $45M → $40M, Q3 2026 at $40M annualizes to $160M — still above threshold.

Linear decline trajectory ($57.5M → $50M → $45M → $40M) still misses thresholdCEO's <$50M commitment is a ceiling, not a floor — actual could be higherFY2024 standalone was below threshold but merger fundamentally changed the equation
sonnetRun 2
8%

The initial prediction of 22% was made before the earnings call provided two critical data points: (1) Q4 SBC at $57.5M confirmed the elevated baseline, and (2) the CEO's <$50M commitment explicitly sets a floor well above the threshold. Pre-earnings, there was uncertainty about whether the 'methodology catch-up' would normalize quickly. Now we know it won't normalize to $37.5M by Q3 2026 — management isn't even targeting that. The 22% initial estimate was reasonable given pre-earnings uncertainty, but the earnings data strongly shifts this toward NO.

Pre-earnings uncertainty about normalization speed is now resolved — management targets $50M not $37.5MQ4 2025 at $57.5M confirmed elevated baseline persistsCEO commitment provides explicit forward guidance above threshold
sonnetRun 3
5%

Resolution requires Q3 2026 SBC ≤ $37.5M OR trailing 4Q ≤ $150M. For trailing 4Q: Q4 2025 ($57.5M) + Q1 2026 (likely $55-65M with merger charges) + Q2 2026 (<$50M per CEO) + Q3 2026 = at minimum $57.5M + $55M + $48M + $40M = $200.5M. This path is mathematically impossible. For single quarter: $37.5M requires a 35% decline from Q4's $57.5M in three quarters. With Anywhere SBC adding on top, the combined entity would need Compass standalone at ~$30M AND Anywhere at ~$7.5M or less. Both are implausible. This is one of the most confident NO predictions in the COMP portfolio.

Trailing 4Q path is mathematically impossible — minimum ~$200MSingle quarter path requires 35% decline PLUS Anywhere SBC near zeroAmong the highest-confidence predictions in the COMP market portfolio
haikuRun 1
8%

CEO says <$50M/quarter. Market needs ≤$37.5M/quarter. CEO's own number is 33% above the threshold. Plus Anywhere adds more SBC. This is a clear NO. Previous 22% estimate was too high — the earnings call resolved the key uncertainty about the normalization path.

CEO's commitment ($50M) is 33% above threshold ($37.5M)Anywhere legacy SBC adds incremental costPrevious 22% overestimated normalization speed
haikuRun 2
5%

Q4 2025 SBC was $57.5M. CEO committed to <$50M starting Q2 2026. That's $200M annualized at best. Threshold is $150M. Gap of $50M per year, or $12.5M per quarter. No mechanism to close this gap by Q3 2026. The methodology catch-up explanation was valid for why SBC was elevated, but the post-merger combined entity has different SBC dynamics.

$50M/year gap between CEO commitment and thresholdNo identified mechanism to close the gap in the timeframePost-merger entity has different SBC dynamics than pre-merger standalone
haikuRun 3
6%

FY2024 standalone was $130M — below threshold. But FY2024 is irrelevant now. The merger changed everything: more employees, retention grants, legacy Anywhere programs. Q4 2025 at $57.5M and CEO targeting <$50M means the combined entity is running at $200M+ annualized. Threshold of $150M is out of reach by Q3 2026.

FY2024 standalone below threshold is irrelevant post-mergerCombined entity runs at $200M+ annualized SBC$150M threshold is structurally out of reach in the timeframe

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Compass's stock-based compensation expense for Q3 2026 (quarter ending September 30, 2026), annualized (i.e., multiplied by 4), is $150M or less. SBC as reported in the quarterly earnings press release, 10-Q, or earnings call. If SBC is reported for the combined entity post-merger, use the combined figure. Alternatively, resolves YES if trailing four quarters SBC is $150M or less as of Q3 2026 filing. Resolves NO if annualized Q3 2026 SBC exceeds $150M, or if SBC is not separately disclosed.

Resolution Source

Compass Inc. Q3 2026 earnings press release and Form 10-Q filing (SEC EDGAR)

Source Trigger

SBC quarterly trajectory vs. $100M annual normalization target

myth-meterNARRATIVE_REALITY_GAPhigh
View COMP Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis