Archived research. Equity forecasting is part of the Runchey Research archive (methodology era 1) and is no longer actively updated. Everything remains published at its original URL. Browse the archive

Back to Forecasting
DALActive

Will Delta achieve FY2026 adjusted EPS at or above $6.50 (low end of guidance)?

Resolves January 31, 2027(182d)
IG: 1.00

Current Prediction

30%
Likely No
Model Agreement85%
Predictions3 runs
Last UpdatedApril 8, 2026

Prediction History

Initial
56%
Mar 19
-26pp
Current
30%
Apr 8
Q1 2026 earnings

FY guidance withdrawn due to fuel volatility. Q1 EPS $0.64 on pace well below $6.50. Q2 fuel at $4.30/gal creates >$2B headwind with only 40-50% recapture. H1 run rate requires heroic H2 recovery.

Why This Question Matters

FY2026 EPS is the single most important test of Delta's premium strategy thesis. The $6.50-$7.50 guidance implies 20% YoY growth despite fuel headwinds. UBS projects only $5.85, which would miss the low end. If Delta achieves $6.50+, it validates that premium revenue mix insulates margins from fuel shocks. If it misses, the structural airline discount embedded in the 7.7x P/E may prove justified.

EXPECTATIONS_PRICEDNARRATIVE_REALITY_GAP

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
Range: 28%33%Aggregate: 30%
Individual Predictions(3 runs)
opusRun 1
30%

The guidance withdrawal is the strongest signal here. Management issued $6.50-$7.50 guidance in January with knowledge of elevated fuel, yet by April they withdrew it entirely. This means their internal models show a meaningful probability of missing even the $6.50 floor. Q1 EPS of $0.64 puts H1 on pace for roughly $1.64-$2.14 (with Q2 guidance). That leaves $4.36-$4.86 needed from H2. Q3 is historically Delta's strongest quarter and could produce $2.00-$2.50, but Q4 is weaker. Hitting $6.50 requires H2 averaging ~$2.18-$2.43/quarter, which needs fuel to normalize meaningfully below $4.00/gal. Possible but management clearly doesn't have confidence in it. ~30% probability.

FY guidance withdrawn — management lacks confidence in $6.50H1 pace requires heroic H2 at ~$2.20+/quarterFuel at $4.30/gal destroys the EPS math
opusRun 2
33%

Working the math: Q1=$0.64, Q2 midpoint=$1.25, so H1~$1.89. Need $4.61 from H2 (Q3+Q4). In FY2025, H2 produced roughly $3.80-$4.00 (Q3 strongest at ~$2.50, Q4 ~$1.30-$1.50). Even with 15% growth on H2 base, that gets to ~$4.40-$4.60 — still short of $4.61 needed. The path to $6.50 requires BOTH fuel normalization AND continued premium/demand strength AND successful fuel recapture. Any one failing makes it very difficult. However, if fuel drops to $2.50-$2.80 in H2 (which is possible if geopolitical tensions ease), the math works. The refinery benefit ($300M/quarter) and MRO growth ($1.2B target) provide incremental earnings support. Slight lean above 30%.

H2 needs to produce ~$4.61 vs ~$4.00 historicalThree conditions must hold simultaneouslyRefinery + MRO provide incremental support
opusRun 3
28%

Taking a more cautious view. Bastian said 'higher for longer' on fuel, not that it will normalize. The $4.30/gal Q2 guidance likely embeds some conservatism, but even at $3.50/gal the margin compression is severe. The >$2B fuel headwind with only 40-50% recapture means $1B+ unrecovered costs annually. Capacity cuts help RASM but reduce total revenue, creating an EPS tension. The AmEx $2B+ and MRO $1.2B are bright spots but insufficient to offset $1B+ fuel drag. Pilot contract issues add operational friction. The base case is likely $5.50-$6.00 EPS, with $6.50 requiring a favorable fuel outcome that management itself doesn't expect.

Bastian signaled 'higher for longer' fuel$1B+ unrecovered fuel headwind after recaptureBase case likely $5.50-$6.00

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Delta's FY2026 adjusted EPS equals or exceeds $6.50. Resolves NO if below $6.50.

Resolution Source

Delta Air Lines FY2026 full-year earnings release (expected January 2027)

Source Trigger

FY2026 EPS guidance of $6.50-$7.50 — 20% YoY growth at midpoint

myth-meterEXPECTATIONS_PRICEDHIGH
View DAL Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis