Back to Forecasting
GTLBActive

Will GitLab disclose Duo Agent revenue or adoption metrics showing >5% penetration of Ultimate customers by Q2 FY2027?

Resolves September 30, 2026(216d)
IG: 1.00

Current Prediction

44%
Likely No
Model Agreement90%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 6, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Duo Agent is the strategic fulcrum identified by four of five lenses. Its success or failure simultaneously affects competitive position, revenue durability, unit economics, and narrative gap. As of the analysis date, Duo Agent carried zero verifiable evidence -- entirely pre-GA. Meaningful early adoption data (>5% of Ultimate customers) would validate the AI-as-opportunity thesis and justify the usage-based pricing transition. Absence of disclosure or weak metrics would confirm the bear case that AI disrupts rather than enhances GitLab's model.

COMPETITIVE_POSITIONREVENUE_DURABILITYUNIT_ECONOMICSNARRATIVE_REALITY_GAP

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 36%52%Aggregate: 44%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
43%

Duo Agent was pre-GA as of Dec 2, 2025 with zero verifiable evidence on adoption or economics. The question requires both disclosure AND >5% Ultimate penetration by September 2026. Management has already pre-announced 'first few platform-based expansions' pre-GA, suggesting willingness to discuss Duo Agent metrics. However, achieving 5% of Ultimate customers within roughly 9-10 months of GA is a high bar for an enterprise product with an unproven usage-based pricing model during a period of 5 C-suite changes. The declining DBNRR (122% to 119%) suggests the expansion engine is weakening, which could both motivate aggressive Duo Agent push and reflect customer caution on new spending.

Pre-GA status with zero adoption data creates maximum uncertainty5% Ultimate penetration within ~10 months of GA is aggressive for enterprise SaaSManagement willingness to discuss early traction pre-GA suggests they will disclose metrics if favorable
opusRun 2
38%

The resolution criteria require a specific quantitative threshold (>5% of Ultimate customers) disclosed through official channels by September 2026. While GitLab management has shown willingness to reference Duo Agent qualitatively ('first few expansions'), enterprise AI tool adoption at 5% penetration within ~10 months of GA faces multiple headwinds: unproven usage-based pricing economics, no reference data for the seat-to-usage transition, and a 32:1 discretionary insider sell:buy ratio suggesting limited internal conviction. The Myth Meter's MODEST expectations classification means the market is not pricing in meaningful Duo Agent success, which paradoxically means GitLab may face less pressure to disclose weak metrics. I assign lower probability because the conjunction of GA launch, meaningful adoption, AND quantified disclosure all happening by Q2 FY2027 requires multiple things to go right.

Conjunction problem: GA + adoption + disclosure all requiredEnterprise AI adoption typically slower than consumerInsider activity (32:1 sell:buy) suggests limited conviction in near-term catalyst
opusRun 3
47%

Two countervailing forces are roughly balanced. For YES: GitLab has strong strategic incentive to disclose Duo Agent metrics if favorable since the market is pricing in minimal AI credit (MODEST expectations), making any positive disclosure a potential catalyst. Management already mentioned 'first few expansions' pre-GA, establishing a disclosure precedent. The 91% customer survey data (expect increased GitLab usage from AI) suggests demand-side readiness, even if management-reported. For NO: the product was not even GA as of Dec 2025, 5% of Ultimate customers is a meaningful threshold, the usage-based pricing model is entirely unproven, and the company is navigating significant leadership transition. Per-seat usage proxies growing 20-40% YoY suggests customers are using more GitLab, which could facilitate Duo Agent upsell, but this is indirect evidence. I land slightly below 50% because the 5% threshold is specific and demanding.

Strong strategic incentive to disclose if metrics are favorablePer-seat usage growth (20-40% YoY) indicates customer engagement conducive to upsell5% threshold is specific and demanding for a newly-GA product
sonnetRun 1
52%

GitLab will almost certainly disclose Duo Agent metrics by September 2026 -- the question is whether they hit 5%. Management already established a disclosure pattern by mentioning 'first few expansions' pre-GA, and four of five lenses identified this as the strategic fulcrum. With MODEST market expectations and a stock at 5.5x forward P/S, GitLab has every incentive to trumpet any positive AI adoption data. The 20-40% per-seat usage growth and 91% customer survey on AI adoption suggest the demand environment is favorable. I give a slight edge to YES because the disclosure bar is actually quite low -- 5% of Ultimate customers is perhaps a few hundred customers, and management will likely discuss Duo Agent extensively regardless given its strategic importance.

Management has strong incentive to disclose AI metrics given MODEST market expectations5% of Ultimate customers may be a relatively small absolute numberAlready discussing pre-GA traction establishes disclosure precedent
sonnetRun 2
45%

The resolution hinges on whether GitLab can get Duo Agent to meaningful scale fast enough. Key consideration: Duo Agent targets Ultimate customers (54% of ARR), and these are GitLab's most engaged, highest-value accounts. Enterprise adoption of AI developer tools has been rapid across the industry (GitHub Copilot precedent), and GitLab's integrated platform gives them a distribution advantage. However, the 5% threshold specifically requires penetration measurement, and companies often avoid disclosing metrics that look weak. If adoption is at 3-4% by September 2026, management may reference Duo Agent qualitatively but avoid the specific quantification that would resolve this YES. The declining DBNRR suggests customers may resist incremental spending, pushing against rapid adoption.

Ultimate customers are the most engaged and likely early adoptersCompanies strategically disclose metrics -- may avoid if numbers look weakDeclining DBNRR signals potential customer resistance to incremental spending
sonnetRun 3
40%

I weigh the pre-GA status heavily. As of Dec 2, 2025, Duo Agent had zero verifiable adoption data. Even assuming GA in Jan 2026, achieving 5% penetration of Ultimate customers by September 2026 gives roughly 8 months of commercial availability. Enterprise procurement cycles for new products typically run 3-6 months, which leaves very little time for widespread adoption. The 'first few expansions' pre-GA is encouraging but 'first few' explicitly signals small numbers. The 32:1 insider sell:buy ratio and director selling 67% of position without a 10b5-1 plan suggest insiders may not be confident in near-term catalysts. I lean below 50% because the timeline is tight for enterprise adoption.

Enterprise procurement cycles of 3-6 months compress the adoption windowPre-GA 'first few expansions' signals small absolute numbersInsider selling pattern suggests limited near-term conviction
haikuRun 1
48%

Two decisive factors: (1) GitLab has strong incentive to disclose any positive Duo Agent data given MODEST market expectations that price in minimal AI credit, and (2) the product was not GA as of Dec 2025, giving only ~8-9 months to reach 5% Ultimate penetration. The first factor pushes toward disclosure, the second makes the 5% threshold uncertain. Near coin-flip with a slight lean toward NO because enterprise adoption at scale takes time.

MODEST market expectations create disclosure incentive~8-9 months from GA to resolution is tightUltimate tier customers are likely early adopters
haikuRun 2
36%

Zero verifiable evidence exists on Duo Agent adoption or economics. The product was pre-GA with no pricing data, no adoption metrics, and no independent verification of customer demand. The 5% threshold is specific and measurable. With the usage-based pricing model entirely unproven and 5 C-suite changes creating execution uncertainty, the burden of proof falls on demonstrating rapid adoption. Most enterprise SaaS products take 12-18 months post-GA to reach meaningful penetration of their existing base.

Zero current evidence on adoption or economicsEnterprise SaaS adoption timelines favor NOLeadership transition creates execution risk
haikuRun 3
44%

The question resolves YES on either revenue disclosure OR adoption metrics showing >5% penetration. This OR condition raises the probability because management can satisfy it through multiple disclosure channels. GitLab already mentioned 'first few expansions' pre-GA, and with Duo Agent being the strategic fulcrum for all five lenses, earnings calls through September 2026 will inevitably feature Duo Agent discussion. The key uncertainty is whether adoption reaches 5% -- with 20-40% per-seat usage growth suggesting engaged customers, and Ultimate customers being the natural early adopter cohort.

OR condition in resolution criteria broadens paths to YESManagement already establishing Duo Agent disclosure precedent20-40% per-seat usage growth indicates engaged customer base

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if by Q2 FY2027 earnings (expected September 2026), GitLab management has disclosed either (a) Duo Agent revenue contribution as a named line item or percentage of ARR, or (b) Duo Agent customer adoption metrics showing penetration exceeding 5% of Ultimate-tier customers. Disclosure can come via earnings call, press release, investor presentation, or SEC filing. Resolves NO if no quantified Duo Agent adoption or revenue data is disclosed, or if disclosed metrics show penetration below 5% of Ultimate customers.

Resolution Source

GitLab Inc. earnings calls, press releases, investor presentations, or Form 10-Q filings for Q4 FY2026 through Q2 FY2027

Source Trigger

Duo Agent GA launch + first adoption/revenue metrics

gravy-gaugeREVENUE_DURABILITYcritical
View GTLB Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis