Back to Forecasting
HOODResolved

Will Robinhood's crypto transaction revenue decline more than 30% quarter-over-quarter in Q4 2025?

Resolves March 15, 2026(17d)
IG: 0.64
ResolvedEarly Resolution
Outcome: NO
Source: Robinhood Q4 2025 earnings press release (Feb 10, 2026): Q4 2025 crypto transaction revenue $221M, down 38% YoY but only ~17.5% QoQ decline from Q3's ~$268M
Resolved: February 10, 2026

Crypto revenue declined QoQ but well within the 30% threshold. The YoY decline (-38%) reflects Q4 2024 being an unusually strong crypto quarter, not a Q4 2025 collapse. The ensemble correctly identified that post-election crypto bull market conditions and Bitstamp institutional volumes would prevent a 30%+ single-quarter decline.

Prediction Score

Initial Prediction
0.040
Brier Score
Final Prediction
0.040
Brier Score
No updates (single prediction batch)

Final Prediction

20%
Likely No
Model Agreement94%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 9, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Crypto is the highest-volatility revenue component, identified independently by three lenses. At 21% of total revenue with +339% YoY growth, it is simultaneously the largest growth driver and the most fragile stream. The Gravy Gauge models 70%+ decline potential in crypto winters. A >30% QoQ decline in Q4 2025 would be an early indicator of cycle turning and would stress-test whether the Bitstamp acquisition genuinely raises the cyclical floor. Stability or growth would extend the favorable-cycle thesis.

REVENUE_DURABILITYCOMPETITIVE_POSITION

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
Actual: NO
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 15%25%Aggregate: 20%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
18%

A 30%+ QoQ decline from $268M requires Q4 crypto revenue below $187.6M. The analysis context notes post-election enthusiasm as a positive factor for Q4 specifically, and Q4 2025 (Oct-Dec) coincides with the period following the November 2024 US presidential election when crypto markets experienced sustained bullish momentum. Bitstamp volumes were up 60%+ QoQ post-acquisition (closed Jun 2025), adding institutional trading volume that raises the floor. While the committee correctly identifies crypto as the most volatile revenue component with 70-80% decline potential in full crypto winters, a 30%+ single-quarter QoQ decline during an active bull cycle is historically rare. Such sharp declines typically require a catalyst like a major exchange failure or regulatory crackdown, neither of which is flagged in the analysis. The insider selling (-$185.4M net) is concerning but may reflect planned diversification during a strong period rather than anticipation of a crypto collapse.

Post-election crypto euphoria continued through Q4 2025Bitstamp adds institutional volume floor30% QoQ decline in single quarter during bull cycle is historically rare
opusRun 2
25%

The committee unanimously classifies the current ~$1B+ annualized crypto rate as cycle-peak. The key tension is between the committee's structural assessment (cycle-peak, not sustainable) and the specific quarter in question. Q4 2025 includes October-December, and crypto markets can shift rapidly. The unresolved debate about whether Bitstamp genuinely raises the cyclical floor or merely extends the peak is central. If peak dynamics dominate, sharp intra-cycle corrections of 30%+ in a single quarter are possible -- Bitcoin has historically experienced 20-30% drawdowns even within bull markets. Smart exchange routing's lower take rates (as low as 10 bps vs. blended 60 bps) could amplify revenue declines even if volumes hold, since revenue = volume x take rate. However, the post-election period traditionally supports risk assets. I weight this at 0.25 -- elevated above base rate for crypto cycle risk but below 50% given the favorable Q4 timing.

Committee consensus: current rate is cycle-peak not baselineSmart routing could compress take rates, amplifying volume declinesIntra-bull-market corrections can exceed 20-30% in BTC price
opusRun 3
22%

The critical gap flagged in the analysis -- Q4 2025 earnings due Feb 10, 2026 -- means the actual Q4 period has already concluded. The question is whether crypto trading volumes and revenue declined sharply during Oct-Dec 2025. Three factors argue against a 30%+ decline: (1) The post-election crypto rally that began in late 2024 showed sustained momentum through 2025, with Bitcoin ETF inflows providing a structural demand floor; (2) Bitstamp institutional volumes represent incremental revenue that didn't exist in prior quarters; (3) Robinhood's third cycle experience means better product positioning (smart routing, expanded crypto offerings). The 70-80% decline potential cited by the committee refers to full crypto winter scenarios lasting multiple quarters, not single-quarter drops during an active cycle. However, Q3 2025's $268M may have been unusually elevated by Bitstamp integration ramp-up effects, making the comp harder. Net assessment: more likely than not that Q4 holds above the $187.6M threshold.

Q4 period already concluded; post-election rally momentum favors sustained volumesBitstamp institutional volumes are incremental to prior periods70-80% decline scenarios span multiple quarters, not single QoQ
sonnetRun 1
15%

This is a straightforward timing question. Q4 2025 was October through December 2025. Bitcoin was in a strong post-election rally during this period, with prices well above the levels seen during Q3 2025. Crypto trading volumes track BTC price momentum closely. A 30%+ QoQ revenue decline would require either a massive crypto crash during Q4 or severe take rate compression. Neither is supported by the analysis context. The Bitstamp acquisition added volume, and management cited volumes up 60%+ QoQ post-acquisition. The committee's concern about cycle-peak dynamics is valid for the medium term but not for this specific quarter. Probability is low.

BTC rally continued through Q4 2025 post-election periodBitstamp volumes incremental and growingNo catalyst for 30%+ single-quarter crash identified
sonnetRun 2
22%

The 30% threshold is aggressive for a single quarter. From the analysis facts: Q3 2025 crypto revenue was $268M, up 339% YoY from ~$61M. The Bitstamp acquisition adds institutional capabilities with volumes up 60%+ QoQ. Even if retail crypto enthusiasm waned somewhat in Q4, the institutional volume base from Bitstamp should provide a meaningful floor. The committee's structural concern about cycle-peak is warranted for multi-quarter analysis, but the specific question asks about a single QoQ period during what remains a bull cycle. Smart routing's take rate compression is a real risk but would need to be dramatic to produce a 30%+ revenue decline alongside still-elevated volumes. The heavy insider selling is a yellow flag but insiders sell for many reasons.

Bitstamp institutional volumes provide floor against 30% declineSingle-quarter 30% decline requires dramatic catalystTake rate compression from smart routing is gradual, not sudden
sonnetRun 3
20%

The analysis notes Q4 2025 earnings are due Feb 10, 2026, meaning the quarter has already passed. The post-election period (Nov 2024 forward) was characterized by strong crypto market performance driven by expectations of favorable US regulatory environment. By Q4 2025, Bitcoin had been in a sustained bull market for over a year. While the committee correctly flags that 70-80% declines are possible in crypto winters, the timing of this question -- a single quarter during an active bull cycle with incremental Bitstamp volumes -- makes a 30%+ decline unlikely. The take rate compression from smart routing is a medium-term headwind but would not cause a step-function decline in a single quarter. I estimate roughly 20% probability, accounting for tail risk of a sudden crypto market reversal.

Post-election regulatory optimism supports crypto through Q4 2025Bull market context makes 30% QoQ decline a tail risk scenarioBitstamp and product improvements buffer against sharp decline
haikuRun 1
17%

Q4 2025 was a strong crypto quarter due to post-election momentum. Bitstamp adds institutional volume. A 30%+ QoQ decline from $268M requires crypto revenue below $187.6M -- extremely unlikely during a bull market quarter. The committee's cycle-peak warning applies to the medium term, not this specific quarter.

Post-election crypto bull market in Q4 2025Bitstamp institutional volumes incremental30% threshold too aggressive for single bull-market quarter
haikuRun 2
23%

While the committee's cycle-peak classification is well-supported, Q4 2025 specifically benefited from continued crypto enthusiasm. The $268M Q3 figure may have been peak, but a 30%+ decline in a single quarter requires a severe downturn. Bitstamp volumes and smart routing expansion provide some buffer. Insider selling is concerning but not predictive of a single-quarter crypto crash. Probability is low but not negligible given crypto volatility.

Cycle-peak classification valid but Q4 timing favorableBitstamp provides volume bufferCrypto volatility creates non-trivial tail risk
haikuRun 3
19%

Three key facts: (1) Q4 2025 was during active crypto bull market with post-election tailwinds; (2) Bitstamp adds institutional volume not present in prior quarters; (3) 30% QoQ decline threshold is historically rare for a single quarter outside crypto winter onset. The committee's 70-80% decline scenarios span multiple quarters. Low probability for this specific quarter.

Active bull market in Q4 2025Institutional volume from BitstampSingle-quarter 30% decline rare outside winter onset

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Robinhood's Q4 2025 cryptocurrency transaction-based revenue (as reported in the Q4 2025 earnings release or 10-K filing) declines more than 30% from Q3 2025's cryptocurrency transaction revenue. Resolves NO if Q4 2025 crypto transaction revenue declines 30% or less, or increases from Q3 2025.

Resolution Source

Robinhood Markets Q4 2025 / FY2024 earnings release or Form 10-K

Source Trigger

Crypto market cycle reversal -- BTC price, trading volumes as leading indicator for 21% of revenue

gravy-gaugeREVENUE_DURABILITYHIGH
View HOOD Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis