Back to Forecasting
KRMNActive

Will KRMN report Q4 FY2025 revenue growth above 25% year-over-year?

Resolves April 30, 2026(41d)
IG: 0.60

Current Prediction

87%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement96%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedMarch 19, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Q4 FY2025 revenue growth is the next data point in the growth trajectory that the valuation depends on. Q3 delivered 42% growth, and FY2025 guidance implies 34% full-year. If Q4 sustains above 25%, it confirms the growth momentum is broad-based and not just acquisition-driven. If growth falls below 25%, it would be the first material deceleration signal, potentially shifting REVENUE_DURABILITY from CONDITIONAL toward FRAGILE.

REVENUE_DURABILITYEXPECTATIONS_PRICED

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 82%90%Aggregate: 87%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
88%

The math strongly supports YES. FY2025 guidance of $455-462M was raised 3 times. With 100% visibility to the midpoint from funded backlog, Q4 revenue should be in the $120-130M range. Q4 FY2024 was approximately $85-95M based on seasonal patterns. Even at the low end ($120M Q4 FY2025 / $95M Q4 FY2024), that is 26% growth — above the 25% threshold. Five Axis acquisition (October 2025) adds partial-quarter revenue that is NOT included in the original guidance, providing upside. The 25% threshold is conservative relative to the guided 34% full-year growth rate. The main risk is that Q4 FY2024 was an unusually strong quarter, making the comparison harder, but even then the absolute revenue level implied by guidance comfortably clears 25%.

FY2025 guidance of $455-462M raised 3 times, 100% visibility25% threshold is well below guided 34% full-year growthFive Axis adds partial-quarter revenue not in original guidance
opusRun 2
85%

The funded backlog of $758M with 100% visibility to guidance midpoint makes a significant revenue miss extremely unlikely. The growth trajectory has accelerated across FY2025 (20.6% Q1 to 41.7% Q3), making Q4 deceleration below 25% a very low-probability event absent an extraordinary disruption. Government shutdown is a timing risk but management explicitly stated 'no impact to 2025 guidance.' The only scenario for NO would be if Q4 FY2024 was anomalously strong (making the comp difficult) AND Q4 FY2025 had delivery delays. Both would need to occur simultaneously. Fixed-price contracts with shipping schedules provide additional visibility.

Growth has accelerated throughout FY2025Government shutdown has no impact per managementBoth difficult comp AND delivery delays needed for NO
opusRun 3
90%

The implicit Q4 revenue from full-year guidance is the strongest evidence. If FY2025 is $458M and Q1-Q3 were approximately $335-340M (based on the growth trajectory), Q4 should be approximately $118-123M. FY2024 was $344M total. If Q4 FY2024 was approximately $92M (25% of full-year, which is typical for defense companies with even seasonality), then $118M/$92M = 28% growth. Even with conservative assumptions on both numbers, staying above 25% is highly likely. The only way to get below 25% is if Q4 FY2024 was disproportionately large (>$94M) AND Q4 FY2025 comes in below the guidance-implied number.

Guidance-implied Q4 FY2025 of $118-123MEstimated Q4 FY2024 of ~$92M yields ~28% growthEven conservative assumptions clear 25%
sonnetRun 1
87%

The full-year guidance provides a strong floor for Q4 revenue. With guidance raised 3 times to $455-462M and 100% visibility from funded backlog, the implied Q4 revenue comfortably exceeds a 25% growth rate over Q4 FY2024. The acquisition of Five Axis in October 2025 provides additional revenue not originally in guidance. The growth trajectory has been accelerating, not decelerating. Government shutdown is a non-event per management. The 25% bar is set well below the full-year guided growth rate of 34%.

Full-year guidance raised 3 times, 100% visibilityFive Axis acquisition adds incremental revenue25% bar is well below 34% guided full-year growth
sonnetRun 2
82%

I assign slightly lower probability than some because the Q4 FY2024 base is uncertain. If Q4 FY2024 was disproportionately strong (a common pattern for defense companies pushing to meet year-end delivery schedules), the YoY comparison becomes harder. Also, while total FY2025 guidance implies strong Q4, the distribution of revenue across quarters is not disclosed precisely. If Q1-Q3 FY2025 ran ahead of plan (which the 3 guidance raises suggest), Q4 could be relatively weaker while still meeting full-year guidance. However, even accounting for these factors, 25% growth is a low bar relative to the trajectory. Probability still strongly favors YES.

Q4 FY2024 base uncertainty — could be seasonally strongRevenue distribution across quarters not precisely disclosed25% is still a low bar relative to trajectory
sonnetRun 3
86%

Three consecutive guidance raises signal management has strong visibility and has been conservative throughout FY2025. Each quarter has surprised to the upside. The funded backlog of $758M exceeds full-year guidance, meaning delivery schedules support continued strong revenue. Five Axis partial-quarter contribution adds incremental revenue. The 25% threshold is conservative — the implied Q4 growth rate from guidance math is closer to 28-32%. Only an extraordinary disruption (major delivery delay, contract cancellation) could push below 25%, and none is indicated.

Three consecutive guidance raises signal conservatismFunded backlog exceeds full-year guidanceImplied Q4 growth rate closer to 28-32%
haikuRun 1
88%

Math is clear. FY2025 guidance of $455-462M implies Q4 revenue well above 25% growth vs Q4 FY2024. Funded backlog provides 100% visibility. Growth has been accelerating. Five Axis adds revenue. Government shutdown has no impact per management. Strong YES.

Guidance-implied Q4 clears 25% easily100% visibility from funded backlogFive Axis adds incremental revenue
haikuRun 2
85%

The 25% threshold is below the guided full-year growth rate of 34%. Even if Q4 is the weakest quarter, it should clear 25% given the guidance math and funded backlog. Only a major delivery disruption or accounting surprise could push below threshold. Probability strongly favors YES.

25% below guided 34% full-year growthFunded backlog removes revenue uncertaintyMajor disruption needed for NO
haikuRun 3
87%

Revenue trajectory has been accelerating throughout FY2025. Three guidance raises demonstrate management conservatism. Funded backlog and fixed-price contracts with shipping schedules provide exceptional visibility. The 25% bar is conservative. Very high probability of YES.

Accelerating growth trajectoryThree guidance raisesExceptional revenue visibility

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if KRMN reports Q4 FY2025 (quarter ending January 2026) revenue that represents greater than 25% year-over-year growth compared to Q4 FY2024. Resolves NO if growth is 25% or below.

Resolution Source

KRMN Q4 FY2025 earnings release or 10-K filing

Source Trigger

Revenue growth rate trajectory — 42% Q3 FY2025, 34% guided full year, 20-25% preliminary FY2026. Growth falls below 15% for any quarter without obvious one-time factors.

myth-meterREVENUE_DURABILITYCRITICAL
View KRMN Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis