Back to Forecasting
KSSActive

Will any Kohl's insider make an open-market stock purchase by end of CY2026?

Resolves January 31, 2027(286d)
IG: 0.64

Current Prediction

17%
Likely No
Model Agreement97%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedMarch 10, 2026

Prediction History

Initial
20%
Mar 5
-3pp
Current
17%
Mar 10
Q4 FY2025 earnings update

Strong Q4 results (EPS doubled, cash +$540M, OCF $1.4B) with zero insider buying response makes continued non-buying MORE informative. CEO 6+ year zero-purchase pattern passes the strongest possible catalyst test.

Why This Question Matters

The rhetoric-action gap is E3-quality evidence: zero open-market purchases across 10 insiders while management promotes turnaround optimism. CEO Bender has made zero purchases in 6+ years on the board; CFO Timm sold near 52-week highs. Any insider purchase — particularly by the CEO or CFO — would materially shift GOVERNANCE_ALIGNMENT from MISALIGNED and suggest genuine private conviction matching public statements. Continued absence through CY2026 would further entrench the credibility loop.

GOVERNANCE_ALIGNMENTNARRATIVE_REALITY_GAP

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 15%19%Aggregate: 17%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
17%

Q4 FY2025 delivered the strongest financial results in years: EPS doubled to $1.62, cash up $540M to $674M, OCF $1.4B, revolver fully exited. If insiders were ever going to make a conviction purchase, this is the ideal setup -- strong results, low stock price near multi-year lows, turnaround narrative with genuine financial backing. Yet there are zero new insider purchases. CEO Bender's 6+ year zero-purchase pattern across his entire tenure (board member since 2019) suggests this is structural unwillingness, not timing. The post-earnings blackout window lifts late March 2026, creating the first informed buying opportunity with strong Q4 data. The SEVP Stores retirement could bring a new hire who purchases. But the dominant signal is: if the best results in years don't prompt buying, what will? Slight downward revision from 20%.

Best financial results in years with zero insider responseCEO 6+ year zero-purchase pattern is structural, not timingPost-earnings blackout lift in late March creates first opportunity
opusRun 2
18%

The information value of non-buying increases with better results. At 20% prior, we already assessed this as unlikely. The Q4 data strengthens the non-buying signal: $1.4B OCF and $674M cash demonstrate genuine financial improvement, yet no insider has made a purchase. The CY2026 timeframe gives ~10 more months. Possible catalysts for a purchase: (1) new executive hire from SEVP Stores succession, (2) board member change, (3) stock price decline to extreme levels prompting token buy. But these are speculative against a robust 6+ year pattern of zero purchases. The institutional inertia against insider buying at Kohl's appears deeply embedded in the corporate culture.

Non-buying with strong results is more informative than non-buying with weak results10 months remain -- CY2026 window through DecemberSEVP succession is the most plausible catalyst for a purchase
opusRun 3
15%

This market is asking whether a pattern that has persisted across 6+ years, multiple CEOs, dramatically different financial conditions, and through both strong and weak quarters will break. The Q4 results provide the strongest possible test of this hypothesis -- genuinely good numbers against a low stock price -- and the pattern holds. Zero purchases. The sibling market calibration tells us to weight revealed behavior over narrative, and the revealed behavior here is unambiguous: insiders at Kohl's do not buy stock on the open market. This appears to be a deeply embedded corporate norm. I lower my probability below 20% -- the new data actually makes a purchase LESS likely because the best catalyst scenario (strong results + low price) has occurred without triggering a purchase.

6+ year pattern tested against strongest possible catalyst and heldRevealed preference is the most reliable signal in insider analysisBest results + low price + zero buying = structural unwillingness confirmed
sonnetRun 1
18%

The prior 20% already reflected the strong non-buying pattern. Q4 results modestly strengthen the bear case: if $1.62 EPS (doubling), $674M cash, and $1.4B OCF don't prompt a single insider purchase, the cultural barrier to buying appears very high. The SEVP Stores retirement is the most plausible path to YES -- a new hire might purchase as a conviction signal. But new executive hires typically receive RSU grants, not open-market purchases. The CY2026 window extends through December, giving time for potential board refreshment. I maintain close to the prior estimate with a slight downward revision.

Strong Q4 results with zero buying response strengthens non-buying signalSEVP succession is most plausible YES catalystCY2026 timeframe gives 10 months of opportunity
sonnetRun 2
16%

Applying the sibling market calibration lesson here is tricky -- the lesson was that we over-anchored on guidance math for the comps market. For insider purchases, the equivalent lesson would be: don't over-anchor on the historical non-buying pattern if there's a credible catalyst for change. The strongest catalyst would be a new CEO who breaks the pattern, but Bender was just appointed in late 2025 and hasn't bought in 6+ years. The financial results that just dropped are genuinely strong and could theoretically motivate a token purchase from a director. But token director purchases at distressed retailers are rare -- directors typically wait for stock price recovery, not bottom-fishing. I lean toward the 15-18% range.

Calibration lesson applied: is there a credible catalyst for pattern break?No credible catalyst identified -- same CEO, same board, same cultureStrong results are necessary but not sufficient condition for insider buying
sonnetRun 3
19%

I want to avoid over-adjusting from the prior 20%. The new data modestly strengthens the case against a purchase but doesn't fundamentally change the analysis. The base rate for insider purchases at mid-cap retailers is probably 15-25% in any given year -- some companies have cultures of insider buying, others don't. Kohl's clearly falls in the 'don't' category. The improved financial results make the continued absence more informative but the market had 10 months remaining regardless. The SEVP succession and potential board changes create non-zero probability of a pattern break. I stay near the prior with a slight downward adjustment.

Avoid over-adjustment from prior 20% -- new data is incremental not transformativeCorporate culture of non-buying is the dominant factorSEVP succession and board changes create residual probability
haikuRun 1
17%

Strong Q4 results with zero insider buying response strengthens the case that insiders won't buy. CEO Bender's 6+ year pattern is the anchor. SEVP retirement is the best YES catalyst but new hires typically get RSUs, not open-market purchases. Slight downward revision from 20%.

Best results in years with zero buying response6+ year CEO non-buying patternSEVP succession is most plausible catalyst
haikuRun 2
16%

The revealed preference signal is clear: Kohl's insiders don't buy stock on the open market. 10 insiders, 6+ years for the CEO, zero purchases across varying financial conditions. The Q4 improvement makes this pattern more informative. Residual probability reflects potential board changes or new hires.

Zero purchases across 10 insiders is robust patternQ4 improvement makes non-buying more informativeResidual probability from potential personnel changes
haikuRun 3
18%

Post-earnings blackout lifts late March 2026, creating the first window where insiders could act on the strong Q4 data. CY2026 extends through December -- 10 months is meaningful time. But the 6-year pattern across multiple leadership regimes suggests corporate culture, not individual reluctance. Slightly below prior 20%.

Post-earnings blackout lift creates first buying window10 months remaining in CY2026 timeframeCorporate culture rather than individual reluctance

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if any Kohl's Section 16 insider (officer or director) files a Form 4 disclosing an open-market purchase of KSS common stock by December 31, 2026. Excludes: restricted stock unit vesting, stock option exercises, and acquisitions under employee stock purchase plans. Resolves NO if no open-market purchase is filed by any insider.

Resolution Source

SEC EDGAR Form 4 filings for Kohl's Corporation (CIK 0000885639)

Source Trigger

Any insider open-market purchase (especially CEO Bender or CFO Timm)

insider-investigatorGOVERNANCE_ALIGNMENTMEDIUM
View KSS Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis