Back to Forecasting
KSSActive

Will Kohl's report positive comparable sales in any quarter of FY2026?

Resolves March 31, 2027(345d)
IG: 0.48

Current Prediction

40%
Likely No
Model Agreement93%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedMarch 10, 2026

Prediction History

Initial
20%
Mar 5
+20pp
Current
40%
Mar 10
Q4 FY2025 earnings update

FY2026 guided -2% to flat (CEO says exit rate must reach positive for flat end). Multiple categories already positive: juniors +8%, non-Kohl's card positive, men's/kids proprietary positive. Kohl's card customer improving toward parity by H2. Only one positive quarter needed.

Why This Question Matters

With 12+ consecutive quarters of negative comparable sales, the first positive quarter would be a powerful de-escalation signal across multiple lenses. Q3 FY2025's improvement to -1.7% and favorable base effects from weak FY2025 comparisons make FY2026 the most likely window for a positive quarter. Achievement would challenge the secular decline thesis, potentially slow the credit loop, and provide management credibility for the turnaround narrative. Continued negative comps through all of FY2026 would confirm structural decline.

OPERATIONAL_EXECUTIONREVENUE_DURABILITYCOMPETITIVE_POSITION

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 37%45%Aggregate: 40%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
40%

The earnings update materially shifts this market. FY2026 guidance of -2% to flat inherently requires positive quarters if the flat end is achieved — CEO Bender explicitly stated the exit rate must reach positive. Multiple categories are already running positive: juniors +8%, non-Kohl's card customers positive, men's/kids proprietary positive, accessories ex-Sephora positive. The math: if non-Kohl's card customers (majority of sales) are already positive, and Kohl's card customers are improving from down mid-teens to down single digits with CFO Timm expecting parity by H2, the trajectory points toward a positive quarter in Q3 or Q4 FY2026. However, applying the sibling market conservatism discount: we over-predicted directional outcomes before. Q4 FY2025 comps decelerated to -2.8% from Q3's -1.7%, showing improvement is not linear. Q1 guided 'down low single digits.' I assign 40%.

CEO explicitly requires positive exit rate for flat guidanceMultiple categories already running positive compsQ4 deceleration from Q3 shows improvement is not linear — conservatism warranted
opusRun 2
42%

I focus on the base effect math and category momentum. FY2025 quarterly progression: Q1 ~-5%, Q2 -4.4%, Q3 -1.7%, Q4 -2.8%. For FY2026, the easiest comparisons are Q1-Q2 (against -5% and -4.4%). But Q1 is guided 'down low single digits,' suggesting management does not expect the easy comparison to produce a positive quarter. The window is Q2-Q4. Juniors at +8% is a leading indicator — this is the category 'furthest along' in the proprietary brand reinvestment curve, and other categories are following. The Kohl's card customer improvement trajectory (mid-teens decline to single-digit decline, with parity expected by H2) is the key swing factor. If card customers reach parity, total comps are likely positive given non-card customers already positive. I rate this at 42% — meaningful upside from 20% but uncertainty remains because the same management that guided conservatively before may be doing so again, or recovery may stall.

Kohl's card customer trajectory toward parity by H2 is the key swing factorJuniors +8% is a leading indicator for proprietary brand strategyQ1 guided negative — window narrows to Q2-Q4
opusRun 3
38%

I weight the negative signals more. Q4 comps of -2.8% were a deceleration from Q3's -1.7%, meaning the trajectory is not monotonically improving. Weather explains 70 bps, but even weather-adjusted -2.1% is worse than Q3. Sephora decelerated to +2%/flat, reducing the contribution that previously masked core weakness. Home and footwear continue to underperform. The 'build throughout the year' narrative requires execution on multiple unproven initiatives simultaneously. The sibling market miss teaches conservatism. Against this: the breadth of positive signals (juniors, accessories, non-card customers, men's/kids proprietary) is genuinely new and broader than the Sephora-only story. I assign 38% — a significant upgrade from 20% but reflecting real execution risk.

Q4 deceleration from Q3 suggests non-linear recovery pathSephora deceleration reduces headline-masking contributionBreadth of positive category signals is genuinely new but unproven at scale
sonnetRun 1
43%

The FY2026 guidance structure is the strongest signal. Management guided -2% to flat full-year comps, and explicitly stated the flat end requires the exit rate to reach positive. This means management itself believes a positive quarter is achievable — they would not guide flat as the upper end if they considered positive quarters impossible. The question is only whether they reach the top end of guidance. Management has demonstrated a pattern of conservative guidance followed by beats (three consecutive quarters in FY2025). If this pattern continues, the flat end (requiring positive exit) is plausible. Non-Kohl's card customers already running positive provide a floor. The market only requires ONE positive quarter out of four — the bar is lower than sustained positive comps.

Management guidance structure implies positive quarters are achievableOnly ONE positive quarter needed out of four — low barConservative guidance pattern followed by beats supports upside scenario
sonnetRun 2
37%

I apply a heavier conservatism discount. The sibling market miss (61% YES on comp-sales, actual was NO) demonstrated that our models over-weight management guidance math. The same risk applies here: management guidance of -2% to flat could be optimistic rather than conservative. FY2026 is the first year under new CEO Bender's strategy — guidance may reflect aspiration rather than achievement. Q4 deceleration to -2.8% from -1.7% is a real datapoint showing improvement is fragile. Tariff implementation in April 2026 could disrupt merchandising strategies and consumer spending. Against this: the breadth of positive category signals is hard to dismiss, and 15+ quarters of negative comps create very easy base effects. I lean toward 37%.

Sibling miss demands heavy conservatism on guidance-implied outcomesQ4 deceleration shows recovery is fragileEasy base effects and positive category breadth are genuine tailwinds
sonnetRun 3
45%

I take a more constructive view based on the category-level data. When I disaggregate: juniors +8%, men's proprietary positive, kids proprietary positive, accessories ex-Sephora positive, non-Kohl's card customers positive, petites +26%, impulse queue +40%. The only clearly negative categories are home (seasonal missteps, correctable) and footwear (boots and active, partially cyclical). Kohl's card customer declining but improving rapidly (mid-teens to single digits, expected parity by H2). The weight of category-level evidence suggests underlying recovery is broader than the headline comp suggests. Q4's -2.8% was dragged down by weather (70 bps) and specific category missteps (home, footwear) that management is actively addressing. A positive quarter in Q3 or Q4 FY2026 is plausible. I assign 45%.

Category-level disaggregation shows majority of business trending positiveHome and footwear are the drags — correctable missteps, not structuralQ3 or Q4 FY2026 most likely window given 'build throughout year' cadence
haikuRun 1
40%

FY2026 guided -2% to flat. CEO says positive exit rate needed for flat. Multiple categories already positive. Only need one positive quarter out of four. Kohl's card customer improving toward parity. Base effects favorable from weak FY2025. Main risk: Q4 showed deceleration, Sephora slowing, tariff uncertainty. Assign 40%.

Only one positive quarter needed from four attemptsMultiple categories already running positiveBase effects from 15+ negative quarters are favorable
haikuRun 2
38%

Applying conservatism from sibling market miss. While the positive signals are real, Kohl's has not reported a positive comp quarter in 15+ periods. Breaking that streak requires sustained execution across multiple categories. Q4 deceleration from Q3 suggests recovery is bumpy. Tariffs could disrupt the H2 improvement thesis. But the guidance structure and category-level data provide a plausible path. 38%.

15+ quarters of negative comps — breaking the streak is hardQ4 deceleration shows bumpy recoveryGuidance structure provides plausible path to positive H2
haikuRun 3
42%

The upgrade from 20% to ~42% is justified by: (1) management explicitly guiding for a scenario that includes positive quarters, (2) non-Kohl's card customers already positive, (3) Kohl's card customer trajectory toward parity by H2, (4) multiple categories showing positive momentum beyond Sephora. The downgrade risks: Sephora deceleration, tariff disruption, home/footwear drag. Net: 42%.

Management guidance explicitly includes positive comp scenarioNon-card customers already positive — card customers convergingSephora deceleration and tariff risk are downside factors

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Kohl's reports positive (>0%) total company comparable sales in any quarterly earnings release during FY2026 (Q1 through Q4 FY2026, approximately May 2026 through March 2027). Resolves NO if comparable sales remain negative in all four quarters of FY2026.

Resolution Source

Kohl's quarterly earnings press releases and 10-Q/10-K filings for FY2026

Source Trigger

First positive same-store sales quarter — turnaround inflection evidence

roadkill-radarOPERATIONAL_EXECUTIONMEDIUM
View KSS Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis