Back to Forecasting
LCIDActive

Will Lucid reduce days of inventory below 80 days by Q2 2026?

Resolves November 15, 2026(199d)
IG: 0.48

Current Prediction

25%
Likely No
Model Agreement78%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedApril 19, 2026

Prediction History

Initial
45%
Mar 17
-20pp
Current
25%
Apr 19
Q1 2026 inventory build — produced 5,500 vs. delivered 3,093

Q1 built ~2,400 units of inventory on the Gravity supply disruption. Starting from 108 days, days-of-inventory likely rose in Q1, requiring dramatic Q2 delivery pickup to reach <80 days by end of Q2.

Why This Question Matters

Inventory days is a leading indicator of demand-supply alignment. The Fugazi Filter flagged 108 days of inventory as significantly above the 50-70 day automotive norm. Declining below 80 days would indicate improving demand absorption; persistently high inventory signals potential impairment risk and demand challenges.

ACCOUNTING_INTEGRITYREVENUE_DURABILITY

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 22%28%Aggregate: 25%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
22%

Q1 produced 5,500, delivered 3,093 — inventory built by ~2,400 units. Starting from 108 days at year-end on ~$85K ASP and Q4 COGS run-rate, adding inventory while COGS/daily dropped (due to lower Q1 production-related COGS recognition) likely pushed days well above 108. To reach <80 days by end Q2 requires a dramatic Q2 delivery pickup clearing inventory backlog.

Q1 inventory built ~2,400 unitsStarting 108 daysNeed dramatic Q2 clearance
opusRun 2
25%

If Q2 deliveries are 6,000-7,000 (normalizing from seat disruption resolution) while production stays steady at ~6,000, net inventory reduction could occur. But starting from higher base and higher Q1 COGS per day, 80-day threshold is tough. Ballpark: possible but not base case.

Q2 delivery recovery neededInventory draw-down requiredStarting point higher
opusRun 3
22%

The inventory build in Q1 is a mechanical consequence of the supply disruption — finished vehicles queued for delivery. If Q2 delivers the backlog + run-rate, inventory normalizes. But 'below 80 days' is a tight threshold; more likely reduces to 90-95 days range.

Mechanical buildBacklog delivery possible80-day threshold tight
sonnetRun 1
28%

Revenue seasonality plus Gravity production normalization could push Q2 deliveries to 6,500-7,500 range, meaningful above Q1 production of 5,500. Net inventory draw possible. 80 days is still optimistic but achievable if Q2 delivery outperformance occurs.

Q2 delivery upsideNet inventory draw possible80-day threshold aggressive
sonnetRun 2
25%

Q1 10-Q in May will disclose actual Q1 days-of-inventory. The calculation uses ending inventory / daily COGS. Depending on COGS definition, this could be higher or lower than estimated from units. Working capital decisions in Q2 could affect materially.

COGS calculation nuanceQ2 working capital decisionsTiming of actual disclosure
sonnetRun 3
25%

Very dependent on Q2 delivery number and working capital management. Range of plausible outcomes wide. Base case ~90-100 days; tail up or down.

Wide outcome rangeQ2 delivery dependentBase case 90-100 days
haikuRun 1
25%

Inventory built in Q1; needs strong Q2 to clear. Threshold tight.

Tight threshold
haikuRun 2
28%

Possible if Q2 delivers backlog but not base case.

Backlog delivery possible
haikuRun 3
25%

Sequential improvement likely but 80 is an aggressive number.

Aggressive target

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Lucid's Q2 2026 10-Q or earnings disclosure shows days of inventory (calculated as ending inventory divided by daily COGS) at or below 80 days. Resolves NO if days of inventory exceeds 80.

Resolution Source

Lucid Q2 2026 10-Q filing or earnings disclosure

Source Trigger

Days of inventory trend — 108 days needs to decline toward 60-70 days

fugazi-filterACCOUNTING_INTEGRITYMEDIUM
View LCID Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis