Back to Forecasting
LMNDActive

Will LMND report multi-product bundling rate above 10% by Q4 2026?

Resolves March 15, 2027(382d)
IG: 0.64

Current Prediction

15%
Likely No
Model Agreement95%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 12, 2026

Why This Question Matters

The 5% multi-product bundling rate versus 30-40% industry average is the most underappreciated structural vulnerability, flagged by three lenses. Weak bundling means weak switching costs, which is the primary reason for the CONTESTED moat classification. Reaching 10% would indicate the platform strategy is beginning to generate defensible customer relationships. Stagnation would confirm that Lemonade lacks the cross-sell mechanics needed for a durable competitive position, regardless of AI advantage.

COMPETITIVE_POSITIONREVENUE_DURABILITYUNIT_ECONOMICS

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 11%18%Aggregate: 15%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
18%

Reaching 10% requires doubling the bundling rate in ~18 months. Management's own 5-year horizon for 'teens' means 10% was not expected until ~2028-2029. Cross-sell volumes doubling YoY is positive but doesn't linearly translate to bundling rate growth — the denominator (total customers) is also growing 24% YoY. If both numerator and denominator grow at similar rates, the rate stays flat. Car in only 10 states limits addressable cross-sell base. The lack of disclosed trajectory data means we cannot distinguish stagnation from acceleration.

Management 5-year horizon for teens implies 10% not expected by Q4 202624% customer base growth dilutes bundling rate improvementCar in 10 states caps addressable cross-sell pool
opusRun 2
15%

The 5% rate represents ~143K bundled customers out of 2.87M. To reach 10% by Q4 2026, assuming customer base grows to ~3.5M (24% growth), LMND would need ~350K bundled customers — roughly 2.4x the current number. Cross-sell doubling YoY is positive but the committee couldn't confirm whether the bundling rate itself is accelerating. The clean-the-book program removing longer-tenure homeowners (likely bundling candidates) is a headwind. Management's 5-year timeline for teens implies they don't expect 10% within 18 months.

Need 2.4x increase in bundled customers accounting for denominator growthClean-the-book removes likely bundling candidatesNo confirmed acceleration in bundling rate trajectory
opusRun 3
13%

The most informative data point is management's own guidance: 'teens on 5-year horizon.' If management targets teens in 5 years (by ~2030), reaching 10% by end of 2026 would mean they're 3-4 years ahead of schedule. The geographic constraint (car in 10 states covering ~50% US market) structurally caps the addressable bundling pool. The three-lens convergence on weak switching costs at 5% suggests this is entrenched, not merely early-stage. There's a non-trivial chance car expansion accelerates bundling faster than expected, but 10% by Q4 2026 is aggressive relative to all disclosed data.

Management timeline implies 10% not until ~2028 at earliestThree-lens convergence on 5% bundling as structural weakness, not early-stageGeographic constraint on car structurally limits bundling addressable market
sonnetRun 1
12%

Management says 'teens in 5 years' — that directly implies 10% is not expected within 18 months. Even with cross-sell doubling, the customer base growing 24% YoY means the rate denominator is expanding fast enough to dilute numerator gains. Car is only in 10 states, and the clean-the-book program is removing precisely the customers most likely to bundle. The dossier notes ~50% car-from-existing rate has been 'stable at this rate for several quarters' — meaning the cross-sell input flow is steady but not accelerating. This resolves NO unless something dramatically changes.

Management 5-year timeline for teens directly contradicts 18-month path to 10%50% car-from-existing rate stable, not acceleratingClean-the-book headwind on bundling candidates
sonnetRun 2
17%

Steelmanning the YES case: car insurance cross-sell from existing customers generates ~50% of new car sales at near-zero CAC. If car expands to 5+ new states in 2026, the addressable bundling pool could surge. Cross-sell volume doubling is a real trajectory. But even steelmanning, the math is hard — the bundling rate needs to double while the denominator grows 24% annually. The dossier says the ~50% car-from-existing rate has been 'stable at this rate for several quarters' — meaning the input flow is steady but not accelerating. Slightly higher probability to account for unknown state expansion upside.

Car state expansion could unlock bundling surge if 5+ new states in 2026Cross-sell volume doubling provides positive trajectoryDenominator growth at 24% dilutes rate improvement regardless of volume gains
sonnetRun 3
14%

The three-lens convergence on bundling weakness is the strongest signal. Three independent lenses (Moat Mapper, Gravy Gauge, Myth Meter) all identified 5% bundling as structural, not early-stage. The unresolved debate between 'vulnerability today vs. opportunity tomorrow' leans toward vulnerability given the data — no disclosed trajectory improvement over multiple quarters. Net insider activity of $23.4M sold and $0 purchased suggests management is not putting personal capital behind the bundling thesis. The geographic constraint on car is binding and unlikely to fully resolve by Q4 2026.

Three-lens convergence on 5% bundling as structural vulnerabilityNet insider selling of $23.4M with zero purchasesGeographic car constraint unlikely to fully resolve by Q4 2026
haikuRun 1
15%

5% bundling rate needs to double to 10%. Management's own timeline says 'teens' in 5 years, implying 10% is ~3 years away. Car in only 10 states limits cross-sell addressable market. Cross-sell growing but rate appears stable across several quarters per dossier. Unlikely to reach 10% by Q4 2026.

Management 5-year timeline for teensCar geographic limitationStable cross-sell rate not accelerating
haikuRun 2
11%

Key math: 2.87M customers growing 24% means ~3.56M by Q4 2026. Current bundled: ~143K. Need 356K+ bundled for 10%. That's 213K new bundled customers needed — a 149% increase. Even with cross-sell doubling YoY, this pace seems implausible given geographic constraints (car in 10 states) and the clean-the-book headwind removing likely bundling candidates.

Need 149% increase in bundled customersGeographic constraints cap cross-sell poolClean-the-book removes bundling candidates
haikuRun 3
16%

Cross-sell volume is doubling but from a small base. Car is the main bundling product and it's only in 10 states covering ~50% of US market. Clean-the-book removes longer-tenure homeowners who are more likely to be bundling candidates. Management timeline points to 2029-2030 for teens range. 10% by Q4 2026 is well ahead of management's own schedule. Small upside possibility from unexpected state expansion.

Management targets teens by ~2030Car in 10 states caps bundling upsideSmall upside from potential state expansion

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Lemonade discloses a multi-product or multi-policy bundling rate exceeding 10.0% by the Q4 2026 earnings release. Resolves NO if the bundling rate remains at or below 10.0%, or if the company ceases to disclose this metric.

Resolution Source

LMND earnings releases, shareholder letters, or 10-K filing disclosing multi-product/multi-policy rate

Source Trigger

Multi-product bundling rate trajectory (stalls at 5-7% or rises above 15%)

moat-mapperCOMPETITIVE_POSITIONTIER_3
View LMND Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis