Back to Forecasting
LMNDActive

Will LMND achieve adjusted EBITDA breakeven (non-negative) by Q4 2026?

Resolves March 15, 2027(382d)
IG: 0.48

Current Prediction

67%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement91%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 12, 2026

Why This Question Matters

EBITDA breakeven is the guided profitability milestone with the most cross-lens implications. Achievement would validate the EXCEEDING execution trajectory, reduce STRETCHED funding fragility by demonstrating self-sustaining economics, and narrow the DISCONNECTED narrative gap by providing concrete profitability evidence. Missing this target would be the first material guidance miss and could trigger simultaneous reassessment of execution, funding, and narrative assessments.

OPERATIONAL_EXECUTIONFUNDING_FRAGILITYNARRATIVE_REALITY_GAP

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 58%72%Aggregate: 67%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
72%

The EBITDA trajectory is compelling: ($49M) Q3 2024 to ($26M) Q3 2025 to ($16M)-($13M) guided Q4 2025 shows roughly $10-13M quarterly improvement. Extrapolating from Q4 2025 midpoint of ($14.5M), breakeven could arrive as early as Q2 2026 — well before the Q4 2026 target. The business was EBITDA positive excluding growth spend in Q4 2024, meaning the core business already generates positive EBITDA. Management has maintained this target unchanged for 3 years and has beaten every guidance for 2 years. CAT risk is real but insurable, and the long runway provides buffer.

EBITDA trajectory math supports breakeven well before Q4 2026Core business (ex-growth spend) already EBITDA positive since Q4 20243-year consistent target with 2-year beat-and-raise track record
opusRun 2
62%

The base case is supportive but risks deserve weight. The quota share reduction removes ~$49M/year (~$12M/quarter) in ceding commission income that must be offset by retained premium growth — the net EBITDA effect is uncertain. Management has discretion to accelerate growth spend (car insurance rollout, geographic expansion) which would rationally delay breakeven if they see attractive ROI. Insider selling of $23.4M with zero purchases suggests less near-term conviction than the narrative implies. Five quarters until resolution means macro conditions, CAT events, and competitive dynamics all have time to shift. However, the trajectory math works and management credibility is high.

Quota share reduction removes ~$12M/quarter ceding commission incomeManagement could choose growth over profitability timelineInsider selling with zero purchases — not alarming but not supportive
opusRun 3
68%

The strongest signal is that the business was EBITDA positive excluding growth spend in Q4 2024 — more than two years before the target. Gross profit growing 261% over 2 years while tech development grew only 5-13% demonstrates genuine operating leverage, not financial engineering. Management has maintained this target for 3 years through multiple guide-ups; missing it would be the first material guidance miss and a massive credibility hit. Cash flow turning positive a year early validates execution capability. The main risk is a major CAT event, but reinsurance provides protection and a single-quarter spike doesn't necessarily invalidate the underlying trajectory.

Business was EBITDA positive ex-growth spend in Q4 2024 — core profitability proven261% gross profit growth vs 5-13% tech expense growth = real operating leverageMissing would be first material guidance miss — strong management incentive to deliver
sonnetRun 1
65%

The trajectory math from ($26M) Q3 2025 to ($14.5M) guided Q4 2025 shows accelerating improvement. At a 50% YoY improvement rate, breakeven arrives by mid-2026 — ahead of Q4 target. Management's 'increasingly obvious' characterization and 3-year consistency on the target are strong confidence signals. The Stress Scanner's concern about quota share reduction before profitability is valid — removing $49M/year in ceding commission creates a headwind the retained premium growth must overcome. But headcount flat at 1,259 while book grew 65% over 24 months shows the cost discipline needed to get there.

Accelerating EBITDA improvement rate supports mid-2026 breakevenManagement characterizes breakeven as 'increasingly obvious'Quota share reduction creates headwind offsetting operating leverage gains
sonnetRun 2
71%

The convergence of evidence is unusually strong: beat-and-raise every quarter for 2 years, cash flow positive a year ahead of plan, headcount flat while book grew 65%, gross profit up 261% in 2 years, and management calling breakeven 'increasingly obvious.' The counterarguments — CAT risk, growth spend flexibility, quota share effects — are valid but each individually manageable and unlikely to all materialize simultaneously. With 5 quarterly reports before resolution, any trajectory deviation would be visible early enough to recalibrate. The first material guidance miss would be devastating to management credibility, creating strong incentive to deliver.

Beat-and-raise track record over 2 years with zero missesCash flow positive a year ahead of schedule validates execution capabilityStrong management incentive — first miss would devastate credibility
sonnetRun 3
58%

I'll weight the structural risks more heavily. The quota share reduction removing ~$49M/year in ceding commission is a genuine headwind that could slow the improvement trajectory — the net EBITDA effect depends on whether retained premium growth exceeds this loss. The growth spend trajectory is a management choice: if they see attractive customer acquisition opportunities (car insurance scaling, geographic expansion), they may rationally prioritize growth over the breakeven timeline. Insider selling of $23.4M with zero purchases across 12 months is notable for a company approaching a key milestone. The base trajectory is supportive but 11 months is a long time with multiple risk factors.

$49M/year ceding commission loss from quota share reduction is material headwindGrowth spend acceleration is a rational management choice that could delay breakeven11 months to resolution with CAT risk, macro risk, and execution risk
haikuRun 1
70%

Management has maintained this target for 3 years and beaten every guidance. Business was EBITDA positive excluding growth spend in Q4 2024 — over two years before the target. Cash flow positive a year early. Gross profit growing 261% with flat headcount demonstrates exceptional operating leverage. The trajectory clearly supports breakeven by Q4 2026. CAT risk is the main wildcard but reinsurance provides protection.

3-year consistent target with zero guidance missesCore business already EBITDA positive ex-growth spendExceptional operating leverage: 65% book growth with flat headcount
haikuRun 2
64%

The trajectory is strongly supportive — ($26M) improving to ($14.5M) guided shows momentum and the improvement rate supports breakeven well before Q4 2026. However, quota share changes removing ceding commission income and potential growth spend acceleration could delay. Management credibility is high with no missed guidance in 2 years, and the 'increasingly obvious' comment signals confidence. The multiple quarters of buffer reduce the risk of a near-miss.

EBITDA improvement trajectory supports breakeven before Q4 2026Quota share and growth spend are swing factors that could delayManagement's 'increasingly obvious' characterization signals high confidence
haikuRun 3
67%

Key supporting factors: 3-year consistent target, beat-and-raise pattern every quarter, cash flow positive a year early, operating leverage with flat headcount and 65% book growth, and gross profit growing 261% while expenses grew single digits. Key risks: CAT events, growth spend acceleration, quota share commission loss. The base case strongly favors achievement given management's track record and the substantial improvement trajectory already demonstrated.

Beat-and-raise pattern across 2 years of quarterly guidanceCash flow positive a year ahead of plan proves execution capabilityCAT events and growth spend choices are primary risk factors

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Lemonade reports non-negative adjusted EBITDA (greater than or equal to $0) for Q4 2026 (October-December 2026) as disclosed in the earnings release. Resolves NO if adjusted EBITDA remains negative for Q4 2026.

Resolution Source

LMND Q4 2026 / FY2026 earnings press release or 10-K filing

Source Trigger

EBITDA breakeven achieved by Q4 2026 as guided

atomic-auditorOPERATIONAL_EXECUTIONTIER_3
View LMND Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis