Back to Forecasting
MAActive

Will Mastercard report cross-border volume growth below 8% YoY in any quarter during the first half of FY2026?

Resolves August 15, 2026(170d)
IG: 0.48

Current Prediction

5%
Likely No
Model Agreement98%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 16, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Cross-border transactions are Mastercard's highest-margin revenue segment. Growth deceleration below 8% would indicate normalization of the post-COVID travel recovery tailwind and directly impair the revenue mix that supports premium margins. The Stress Scanner identified cross-border revenue as a key variable in compound stress scenarios, while the Regulatory Reader flagged UK CAT-driven fee restructuring as a direct threat to cross-border fee yields. FY2025 cross-border growth was ~17-18%, so 8% would represent a significant deceleration requiring explanation.

REVENUE_DURABILITY

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 3%6%Aggregate: 5%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
5%

Cross-border volume growth at 14% (Q4 2025) is nearly double the 8% threshold. Even a significant deceleration of 6 percentage points would still leave growth at 8%. For cross-border volume growth to halve in one or two quarters would require an extraordinary shock -- the Stress Scanner identifies this as needing recession + FX normalization + geopolitical disruption simultaneously. E-commerce cross-border at ~20% growth provides a structural floor beneath aggregate cross-border volumes.

14% current growth vs 8% threshold -- nearly 2x bufferCompound adverse triggers required per Stress Scanner (recession + FX + geopolitical)E-commerce cross-border at 20% growth provides structural volume floor
opusRun 2
4%

The committee's unresolved debate about whether 14-15% reflects travel recovery (temporary) vs structural growth (durable) introduces some uncertainty. However, even the most bearish interpretation of 'normalization toward pre-COVID 8-12%' implies a gradual multi-year process, not a cliff in one quarter. The MEA moderation and US inbound travel moderation in Q1 2025 were corridor-specific and did not materially dent aggregate 14-15% growth. UK CAT ruling affects yields, not volumes.

Even bearish normalization to 8-12% is a multi-year process, not a single-quarter cliffCorridor-specific moderation (MEA, US inbound) did not move aggregate growthUK CAT ruling affects fee yields not transaction volumes
opusRun 3
6%

Bear case: a global recession trigger in early 2026 that sharply reduces international travel. Even the 2008 recession saw gradual rather than cliff-like volume declines. The compound probability of recession + geopolitical shock + travel disruption occurring specifically in Q1 or Q2 2026 is very low. However, geopolitical escalation in major corridors (US-EU, US-China) could theoretically be more disruptive than historical precedents suggest, which adds a small tail risk premium above the base case.

Compound probability of recession + geopolitical + travel disruption is very low for H1 2026Even 2008 recession showed gradual cross-border volume decline, not cliffGeopolitical escalation in major corridors adds small tail risk premium
sonnetRun 1
4%

Cross-border volume at 14% with an 8% threshold is a massive gap requiring near-50% deceleration in growth rate within 1-2 quarters. This simply does not happen absent a major global recession or pandemic-scale event. The committee analysis is unambiguous: compound adverse triggers are needed simultaneously. No such compound catalyst is identified in the current environment.

Near-50% growth rate deceleration needed in 1-2 quarters -- historically unprecedented absent pandemicCommittee consensus: compound adverse triggers required simultaneouslyNo compound catalyst identified in current environment
sonnetRun 2
5%

Travel recovery normalization argument has merit as a medium-term concern but is not a near-term threat. Even if growth moderates by 2-3 percentage points per quarter (aggressive assumption), that yields 11-12% by Q2 2026, still well above 8%. Structural e-commerce cross-border growth at 20% provides a volume floor that makes sub-8% growth almost impossible without a systemic shock to global trade.

Even aggressive 2-3pp per quarter deceleration yields 11-12% by Q2 2026 -- still above 8%E-commerce cross-border at 20% growth creates structural volume floorTravel normalization is medium-term concern, not near-term threat
sonnetRun 3
3%

The question window is only two quarters (Q1 and Q2 2026). For either to show sub-8% growth requires rapid, severe deceleration from 14%. No specific catalyst is identified in the analysis. UK CAT ruling affects fees not volumes. MEA moderation was localized. The most likely path for Q1/Q2 2026 is 12-15% cross-border volume growth, consistent with gentle deceleration trend but nowhere near 8%.

Only two quarters in window -- insufficient time for gradual normalization to reach 8%No specific near-term catalyst identified for severe decelerationMost likely outcome is 12-15% growth, 4-7pp above threshold
haikuRun 1
5%

Cross-border at 14%, threshold at 8%. That is a 6-point buffer. Growth has been stable at 14-15% for 4 consecutive quarters. Committee says compound triggers needed. Very unlikely to breach 8% in H1 2026.

6 percentage point buffer between current growth and threshold4 quarters of stable 14-15% growth trajectoryCompound adverse triggers required per committee analysis
haikuRun 2
4%

E-commerce cross-border at 20% growth provides a structural floor. Travel recovery may moderate but will not collapse in two quarters. No recession signal in current data from the analysis. Sub-8% requires an extreme scenario that the Stress Scanner rated as needing compound triggers.

E-commerce cross-border 20% growth provides structural floorNo recession signal in current analysis dataStress Scanner rates sub-8% as requiring compound simultaneous triggers
haikuRun 3
6%

Even accounting for FX headwind (affects yields not volumes), travel moderation in select markets, and UK CAT ruling pressure, none of these individually or collectively touch aggregate cross-border volumes enough to halve the growth rate from 14% to below 8%. Small tail risk premium for unknown unknowns.

FX headwind affects yields not volumes per committee findingSelect market moderation insufficient to halve aggregate growthSmall tail risk premium for unidentified shocks

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Mastercard reports cross-border volume growth (in local currency terms, as disclosed in quarterly earnings supplemental data) below 8.0% year-over-year for either Q1 2026 or Q2 2026. Resolves NO if cross-border volume growth is 8.0% or above in both Q1 and Q2 2026.

Resolution Source

Mastercard quarterly earnings press releases, supplemental operational metrics, and investor presentations for Q1 and Q2 2026

Source Trigger

Cross-border volume growth deceleration below 8%

gravy-gaugeREVENUE_DURABILITYHIGH
View MA Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis