Back to Forecasting
MOHActive

Will Molina Healthcare lose a major state Medicaid contract (CA/TX/WA/NY) in 2026?

Resolves January 15, 2027(323d)
IG: 0.60

Current Prediction

14%
Likely No
Model Agreement83%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 5, 2026

Why This Question Matters

State contract concentration (top 4 states = 51% of Medicaid revenue) means a single contract loss is a material event. Virginia's Q3 2025 loss (120K members) demonstrated this is not theoretical. The Washington RFP expected in 2026 puts 790K members at risk. A loss in CA, TX, WA, or NY would be a classification-changing event — likely downgrading REVENUE_DURABILITY to FRAGILE regardless of the rate-trend debate. Retention confirms structural stability.

REVENUE_DURABILITYCUSTOMER_CONCENTRATION

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 8%22%Aggregate: 14%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
12%

Historical 90% win rate implies 10% loss rate per RFP. With WA RFP expected in 2026 and possible other renewals, the question is whether ANY of the four specific high-value states go bad. Even if 2-3 RFPs occur across these states, base rate suggests ~10-15% chance of at least one loss.

90% historical win rate = 10% loss rate per RFPWA RFP expected 2026 (790K members)Need loss in ONE of four specific states
opusRun 2
18%

Virginia loss in Q3 2025 demonstrates contract loss risk is real and recent. WA RFP in 2026 creates specific catalyst. State agencies function as monopsonist buyers with pricing pressure. OBBBA may change procurement dynamics, increasing state scrutiny. With 2-3 potential RFP cycles in top-4 states, compound probability of at least one loss rises above base rate.

Virginia loss proves recent contract loss riskWA RFP is specific near-term catalystOBBBA changing procurement environment
opusRun 3
8%

90% win rate over many years is strong, and Virginia was NOT a top-4 state. CA, TX, WA, NY are Molina's largest and most strategically important markets—likely to receive disproportionate management focus and competitive advantages from scale. 21-state diversification provides operational expertise. Losing a flagship state would be much rarer than losing a smaller market like Virginia.

Top-4 states get disproportionate management focusVirginia was NOT in top-4Scale advantages in largest markets
sonnetRun 1
15%

Base rate of 10% loss per RFP is established. WA RFP creates concrete 2026 catalyst with 790K members at risk. States are facing budget pressure and may be more willing to switch vendors for cost savings. However, 90% win rate reflects Molina's competitive strength in Medicaid operations. Probability reflects base rate applied to 1-2 likely RFP cycles in top-4 states.

10% base rate loss per RFPWA RFP in 2026 is known catalystState budget pressure may increase switching
sonnetRun 2
22%

Virginia loss is a recent negative indicator. WA RFP timing creates specific 2026 exposure. OBBBA implementation may cause states to restructure contracts or change vendor mix. MCR challenges (Medicaid 90.5%, consolidated 92.6%) suggest Molina may struggle to remain competitive on pricing while maintaining profitability. Higher probability reflects multiple potential catalysts.

Virginia loss demonstrates recent failure modeMCR pressure may constrain competitive pricingOBBBA restructuring risk
sonnetRun 3
11%

90% win rate is a strong historical baseline. Top-4 states represent core markets with long-standing relationships and operational scale advantages. While WA RFP creates risk, Molina's 790K member scale in WA provides incumbency advantage. Virginia was a smaller, less strategic market. Estimate ~10-12% risk reflecting base rate with modest adjustment for one major RFP cycle.

90% historical win rate baselineIncumbency and scale advantages in top-4 statesWA represents one RFP cycle in 2026
haikuRun 1
14%

Base rate of 10% per RFP. WA RFP in 2026 is the primary known catalyst. Virginia loss shows it can happen. Committee stated major contract loss would be classification-changing, highlighting the severity but not increasing the likelihood. Estimate reflects roughly one major RFP with base rate loss probability.

10% base rate per RFPWA RFP primary catalystVirginia demonstrates concrete risk
haikuRun 2
19%

Virginia loss is recent (Q3 2025). WA RFP expected in 2026 creates specific risk. Unclear how many other top-4 RFPs occur in 2026. If 2-3 RFPs across CA/TX/WA/NY, compound probability of at least one loss rises to ~18-25% range. State budget constraints post-pandemic may increase vendor switching.

Virginia loss is recent precedentMultiple potential RFPs in 2026State budget pressure
haikuRun 3
10%

90% win rate is established over many years. Top-4 states are core markets unlikely to be lost without major operational failures. WA RFP is one event. Base rate of ~10% per RFP seems appropriate. Conservative estimate at lower bound given strategic importance of these specific markets vs smaller states like Virginia.

90% historical win rateTop-4 strategic importanceSingle known RFP (WA) in 2026

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if by December 31, 2026, Molina Healthcare discloses in 10-Q, 10-K, 8-K filings, earnings calls, or press releases the loss of a Medicaid managed care contract in California, Texas, Washington, or New York. Loss defined as: failure to win re-procurement, non-renewal, or state-initiated termination affecting any material portion of members in those states. Resolves NO if all four contracts are retained or renewed through 2026.

Resolution Source

Molina Healthcare 10-Q, 10-K, 8-K filings and earnings call transcripts; state Medicaid agency contract award announcements (CA DHCS, TX HHSC, WA HCA, NY DOH)

Source Trigger

State RFP outcomes — 90% historical win rate; Virginia lost Q3 2025; trigger at win rate <80% or loss of CA/TX/WA/NY contract

gravy-gaugeREVENUE_DURABILITYHIGH
View MOH Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis