Back to Forecasting
MOHActive

Will Molina Healthcare's Medicaid rate-trend gap widen beyond 200 bps or rates fall below 5% by Q2 2026?

Resolves August 15, 2026(170d)
IG: 0.60

Current Prediction

33%
Likely No
Model Agreement91%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 5, 2026

Why This Question Matters

The rate-trend gap is the core margin compression mechanism. Currently 150 bps (5.5% rates vs 7% medical cost trend), all models expect eventual normalization via actuarial soundness requirements but disagree on timing. If the gap widens to >200 bps or rates fall below 5%, it would push the classification toward FRAGILE and trigger a Gravy Gauge re-run. Rate improvement toward closing the gap would increase confidence in CONDITIONAL.

REVENUE_DURABILITYREGULATORY_EXPOSURE

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 28%42%Aggregate: 33%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
32%

Current gap is ~150 bps with rates at ~5.5%, requiring either 50+ bps deterioration or rates falling 50+ bps. Actuarial soundness requirements provide structural floor, and management guidance claims 2026 rates will exceed trend. State budget pressures from OBBBA create downside risk, but would need material acceleration to hit thresholds by Q2 2026.

Current rate-trend gap at 150 bps (below 200 bps threshold)Actuarial soundness requirements mandate cost coverageState budget pressures from OBBBA may delay rate adjustments
opusRun 2
28%

Management explicitly guided 2026 rates 'modestly in excess of trend', suggesting gap compression rather than expansion. For YES resolution, gap must widen by 50+ bps OR rates fall by 50+ bps from Q3 2025 baseline - both require reversal of stated trajectory. Committee consensus expects 1-2 year normalization timeline via actuarial soundness.

Management guidance for rate improvement in 2026Actuarial soundness legal mechanism for rate catch-upCurrent gap at 150 bps requires material deterioration
opusRun 3
35%

Data vintage concern: fundamentals are 128 days old, Q4 2025 earnings likely provided updated rate commentary. Current 150 bps gap and 5.5% rates create narrow margin for error. State budget pressures and political dynamics could delay adjustments, and medical cost trend acceleration is possible. Management guidance not independently verified against state rate letters.

Data staleness - Q4 2025 earnings may have material updatesState budget pressures from OBBBAMedical cost trend could accelerateManagement guidance not independently verified
sonnetRun 1
38%

The gap is already at 150 bps - only 50 bps from the threshold. State budget pressures are real, and management's claim of rates 'modestly in excess of trend' wasn't verified. With 128-day-old data and Q4 earnings potentially showing deterioration, there's meaningful risk of hitting the threshold despite actuarial soundness protections.

Only 50 bps cushion from 200 bps thresholdUnverified management guidanceState budget pressures may constrain rate increasesStale data - Q4 results unknown
sonnetRun 2
42%

Management cut EPS guidance by 43% ($24.50 to $14.00) - that's not a company with good visibility. The Regulatory Reader flagged 300-400 bps rate-trend estimate using a broader measure. Committee consensus on normalization is based on actuarial soundness theory, but practical politics could easily push this into Q2 2026 territory.

Massive EPS guidance cut signals poor visibilityRegulatory Reader estimate of 300-400 bps gap (broader measure)Political dynamics may delay rate adjustmentsTimeline uncertainty in committee debate
sonnetRun 3
36%

The COO buying $1.56M after the rate-trend gap disclosure is a signal of insider confidence in recovery. Actuarial soundness is a legal requirement, not aspirational. Committee achieved 4/4 agreement on eventual normalization. Base case is gap compression, but state budget constraints and 6-month window create non-trivial tail risk.

COO insider buying after gap disclosureActuarial soundness as legal mandateCommittee 4/4 consensus on normalizationState budget pressures create downside risk
haikuRun 1
29%

Management guided rates will exceed trend in 2026. Current gap at 150 bps requires 50+ bps worsening to hit threshold. Actuarial soundness provides regulatory floor for rate adequacy.

Management 2026 guidance for rate improvement50 bps cushion to thresholdActuarial soundness requirements
haikuRun 2
33%

Data is 128 days old. State budget pressures and unverified management guidance create uncertainty. Gap only 50 bps from threshold with Q4/Q1 results unknown.

Stale fundamentals (128 days)Unverified management claimsTight margin to threshold
haikuRun 3
31%

Committee 4/4 agreement on normalization timeline of 1-2 years suggests gap compression is baseline. State concentration in top 4 (51%) means few rate decisions drive outcome, but actuarial soundness is structural.

4/4 committee consensus on normalization1-2 year timeline for rate catch-upActuarial soundness as legal floor

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if either: (1) Molina discloses in Q1 2026 or Q2 2026 10-Q filings or earnings calls that weighted-average Medicaid rate increases are below 5.0%, OR (2) the disclosed or calculable gap between medical cost trend and rate increases exceeds 200 basis points. Medical cost trend measured as year-over-year Medicaid medical care costs per member per month growth. Resolves NO if neither condition is met by the Q2 2026 10-Q filing date.

Resolution Source

Molina Healthcare Q1 2026 and Q2 2026 10-Q filings, MD&A Medicaid segment discussion; earnings call transcripts with rate and trend commentary

Source Trigger

Medicaid rate decisions (key states) — 5.5% avg rate vs 7% trend; trigger at rate increases <5% sustained or gap widens to >200 bps

gravy-gaugeREVENUE_DURABILITYHIGH
View MOH Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis