Back to Forecasting
PYPLActive

Will the Federal Reserve cut rates by 75bp or more (cumulative) by December 31, 2026?

Resolves January 15, 2027(323d)
IG: 0.48

Current Prediction

30%
Likely No
Model Agreement94%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 9, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Interest rate sensitivity was classified as MATERIAL — PayPal earned ~$380M from customer balance interest income in FY2024. Each 25bp cut creates $50-75M in annual earnings headwind. Cumulative 75bp cuts would represent a $150-225M+ headwind, material against ~$4.1B net income. This market tests whether the macro tailwind that supported recent earnings reverses. A YES resolution compounds the branded checkout erosion with an earnings headwind from a factor entirely outside management control. A NO resolution preserves the interest income cushion during the competitive transition.

INTEREST_RATE_SENSITIVITYREVENUE_DURABILITY

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 27%35%Aggregate: 30%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
32%

The Fed cut 100bp in late 2024 (from 5.50% to 4.50%) then paused for the entirety of 2025 — a 12+ month hold at 4.50%. This prolonged pause signals the Fed believes rates are near-appropriate or inflation risks remain. For 75bp cumulative cuts in 2026, the Fed needs to cut at 3 of the ~7 remaining FOMC meetings (Mar-Dec). While this is mechanically feasible, the year-long pause suggests the bar for resuming cuts is high. The base case is 1-2 cuts; 3+ requires either a clear inflation victory or meaningful economic softening. The 'at any point' resolution language means no path-dependency concern, but rate reversal mid-year is extremely unlikely. Edge case: a mid-2026 recession could accelerate cuts to reach 75bp by year-end.

12+ month Fed pause at 4.50% signals caution and high bar for further cuts75bp requires 3 cuts at 7 remaining meetings — feasible but above consensusTail risk of recession could accelerate cutting pace in H2 2026
opusRun 2
28%

The dominant signal is the full-year pause throughout 2025. The Fed cut 100bp in Sep-Dec 2024 then stopped entirely, suggesting inflation remains above target and the labor market is resilient enough to forestall further easing. For 75bp in the remaining ~10.5 months of 2026, the economy would need to weaken meaningfully OR inflation would need to sustainably reach 2%. The prolonged pause argues against aggressive easing absent a clear catalyst. Historical parallel: after the 2019 mid-cycle adjustment (75bp cuts Jul-Oct), the Fed paused for months before COVID forced action. Without an exogenous shock, gradual easing of 25-50bp is more likely than 75bp+. The prediction context correctly notes this is fundamentally a Fed policy question where the committee's PayPal analysis provides limited insight.

Full 2025 pause indicates structural inflation stickiness limiting further cutsNo exogenous shock visible — gradual 25-50bp easing is base caseHistorical mid-cycle adjustment parallels suggest extended pauses after initial cuts
opusRun 3
30%

The year-long hold at 4.50% is the key fact. After cutting 100bp in late 2024, the Fed judged that further easing was unwarranted throughout 2025 despite market expectations for continued cuts. This recalibration suggests the neutral rate may be higher than previously estimated, making 75bp of additional cuts (to 3.75%) a significant move. For resolution, need 3 standard 25bp cuts across 7 remaining meetings. Catalysts that could drive this: unemployment rising above 4.5%, PCE inflation sustainably at or below 2%, or financial stress events. The 'at any point' clause means even a brief touch of 3.75% resolves YES, but the Fed rarely reverses mid-cycle. Base case: 1-2 cuts for 25-50bp. The probability of 3+ cuts is meaningful but below coin-flip.

Neutral rate may be higher than expected — 2025 pause suggests 4.50% is near-equilibriumThree catalysts needed: rising unemployment, inflation at target, or financial stressResolution requires sustained cutting, not a brief touch — Fed rarely reverses mid-cycle
sonnetRun 1
35%

The Fed held at 4.50% for all of 2025 after the late-2024 100bp cut. This is a strong signal of caution — the Fed clearly doesn't feel urgency to ease further. 75bp cumulative requires 3 cuts across ~7 remaining FOMC meetings, meaning cutting at about 43% of meetings. Market consensus likely expects 1-2 cuts for 2026, making 3+ the above-consensus scenario. However, the Fed has 7 meetings and economic conditions could deteriorate — if unemployment ticks up or a financial stress event occurs, the Fed could front-load cuts. The prediction context notes PayPal's ~$380M interest income is at risk but correctly identifies this as primarily a macro question. I lean slightly below one-third probability: the cautious Fed posture makes 3 cuts possible but not the base case.

Year-long pause at 4.50% signals cautious Fed with high bar for further easing7 remaining FOMC meetings provide enough opportunities for 3 cuts if catalyst emergesAbove-consensus scenario — market likely prices 1-2 cuts for 2026
sonnetRun 2
27%

The 12+ month pause is the dominant signal. After cutting 100bp in late 2024, the Fed stopped for all of 2025 — this is not a Fed eager to ease. Three cuts in 2026 would require either a clear inflation victory or economic deterioration significant enough to shift the FOMC's bias. Historical base rate: once the Fed pauses for a full year after initial cuts, the subsequent cutting pace tends to be gradual (1-2 per year, not 3+). The tail risk of recession could accelerate cuts, but that's perhaps a 20-25% scenario, and even in a recession scenario, 75bp by year-end requires the recession to start by mid-2026 to allow time for the policy response. The prediction context acknowledges limited committee insight into Fed decision-making.

Year-long pause after initial cuts historically followed by gradual easing, not accelerationRecession tail risk (~20-25%) is primary path to 75bp but requires early-2026 onsetCommittee analysis has limited predictive value for Fed policy decisions
sonnetRun 3
33%

The 2025 pause tells us the 'easy' cuts are done. Remaining cuts require genuinely new data — either unemployment rising above ~4.5% or PCE sustainably hitting the 2% target. There are enough meetings (7 remaining) for 3 cuts. The probability breaks down as: ~25-30% chance of recession/significant softening triggering 3+ rapid cuts, plus ~5-10% chance of gradual easing reaching 75bp by December if the Fed starts cutting in Q2 and continues quarterly. Combined, roughly one-third. The prediction context's PayPal-specific analysis (interest income sensitivity, management guiding ex-interest) confirms this market tests a real financial impact but doesn't help predict the Fed's behavior.

Remaining cuts require new data — inflation at target or labor market softeningTwo paths to 75bp: rapid recession response (~25-30%) or gradual quarterly cuts starting Q2 (~5-10%)Management already guiding ex-interest confirms the financial materiality regardless of outcome
haikuRun 1
30%

Fed paused all of 2025 at 4.50% after 100bp of late-2024 cuts. Need 3 more cuts for 75bp cumulative. Long pause signals cautious Fed — 3 cuts in 2026 is above consensus. Possible if economy weakens but not the base case. Each 25bp cut represents $50-75M headwind to PayPal per the analysis, but this is fundamentally a macro call.

12+ month pause signals cautious Fed posture3 cuts needed across 7 remaining meetings — above consensus expectationRecession scenario is primary catalyst for 75bp+
haikuRun 2
28%

Year-long Fed pause at 4.50% is the strongest signal — inflation likely still sticky, labor market holding up. 75bp requires meaningful economic deterioration or clear inflation victory. Historical pattern after extended pauses: gradual resumption, not acceleration. Below 30% probability.

Extended pause indicates sticky inflation preventing further easingHistorical pattern: gradual resumption after long pausesBase case is 1-2 cuts (25-50bp) in 2026
haikuRun 3
33%

100bp already cut in late 2024, then full 2025 pause. 7 FOMC meetings remain in 2026 — mechanically enough for 3 cuts. The question is whether a catalyst emerges. If labor market softens or inflation convincingly hits 2%, the Fed could resume quarterly cuts starting mid-2026. But the prolonged pause argues against aggressive easing. One-third probability captures the upside scenario without overweighting it.

7 remaining FOMC meetings provide mechanical opportunity for 3 cutsCatalyst needed: labor softening or inflation at targetOne-third probability balances upside scenario against cautious base case

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if the Federal Reserve's federal funds target rate upper bound is reduced by 75 basis points or more (cumulative) from the rate in effect on February 9, 2026, at any point before December 31, 2026. As of February 2026, the upper bound is 4.50%. Resolves YES if the upper bound reaches 3.75% or lower at any point in 2026. Resolves NO if cumulative rate cuts total less than 75bp through December 31, 2026.

Resolution Source

Federal Reserve FOMC meeting statements and federal funds rate target announcements (federalreserve.gov)

Source Trigger

Fed rate cuts materially reduce interest income tailwind (~$380M at risk; each 25bp = ~$50-75M headwind)

gravy-gaugeINTEREST_RATE_SENSITIVITYHIGH
View PYPL Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis