Back to Forecasting
REZIActive

Will REZI announce a CFO or CAO departure in 2026?

Resolves January 15, 2027(323d)
IG: 0.48

Current Prediction

44%
Likely No
Model Agreement91%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 24, 2026

Prediction History

Initial
52%
Feb 9
-8pp
Current
44%
Feb 24
Q4 2025 earnings update

CFO Carlet confirmed present on Q4 call. Record results reduce pressure. However, historical base rate (4 in 7 years) and separation creating need for two CFOs partially offset.

Why This Question Matters

Four CFOs and four CAOs since 2018 was flagged as material governance concern affecting estimation continuity. A fifth departure would further escalate governance concerns. Stability through 2026 would suggest the revolving door pattern has stabilized.

GOVERNANCE_ALIGNMENTACCOUNTING_INTEGRITY

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 40%48%Aggregate: 44%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
47%

CFO Carlet's confirmed presence on the Q4 2025 earnings call provides a concrete anchor that he was retained through early 2026, and record EBITDA (+20% YoY) and corrected leverage (3.9x vs. feared 5.5x) remove the performance-pressure scenario. However, the historical base rate of 4 CFOs in 7 years (~57% annually) is a powerful prior, and the separation mechanics are now the dominant risk: a H2 2026 spin requires RemainCo and SpinCo each to have a CFO, structurally necessitating either a hire or an elevation that counts as a departure. The net is a modest downward revision from 52% given confirmed Q4 retention and improved financials, with the structural spin-off risk preventing a steeper decline.

CFO Carlet confirmed on Q4 2025 earnings call — 3 months of concrete retentionH2 2026 separation structurally requires two CFOs where one currently existsHistorical base rate ~57% annual departure rate (4 CFOs in 7 years) anchors above 50%
opusRun 2
44%

The combination of confirmed CFO retention through Q4 earnings and materially better-than-feared financials (OCF $453M vs. feared $303M, no goodwill impairment) shifts the probability down from 52%. Record FY2025 performance substantially reduces the probability of a board-driven management change. The key structural offset is the spin-off: transactions of this scale and complexity routinely result in CFO transitions as one executive cannot simultaneously manage a carve-out while also running post-separation finance for two companies. The Form 10 filing and debt allocation still ahead represent peak stress for Carlet, but the improved financial platform may retain him through close.

Record FY2025 results reduce board-driven management pressure materiallySnap One synergies 18 months ahead of schedule signals CFO execution competenceSpin-off Form 10 still unfiled — peak CFO stress period lies ahead through H2 2026
opusRun 3
48%

The prior 52% was driven by the historical turnover base rate and CFO compliance concerns. The delta confirms Carlet was retained through the Q4 earnings cycle, which is modestly positive, and the financial results were strong. However, the spin-off is the dominant remaining factor: the question covers all of 2026, and the separation is reaffirmed for H2 2026. A spin-off of this complexity — carve-out financials, debt allocation, Honeywell litigation assignment, standalone projections — typically results in a CFO change either through promotion to one entity or departure, which would resolve the market YES. No disclosed retention agreements through transaction close, and the DEF14A 2026 has not yet confirmed OCF reinstatement in compensation. Probability moves to 48% — modestly below prior 52%.

No retention agreements disclosed through spin-off close — departure remains structurally unconstrainedSpin-off complexity (Form 10, carve-outs, debt allocation) historically drives CFO transitionsImproved leverage headroom (3.9x vs. 4.0x covenant) reduces lender-driven CFO pressure
sonnetRun 1
45%

The Q4 2025 earnings call confirms CFO Carlet remains in the role as of late February 2026, eliminating the early-2026 departure scenario that may have partially supported the 52% prior. Record financial performance across all metrics (revenue +11%, EBITDA +20%, OCF recovered to $453M) substantially reduces both board incentive and CFO voluntary departure incentive. The 9-month remaining resolution window (through Dec 31, 2026) is primarily a spin-off story: the H2 2026 separation creates genuine structural pressure for leadership bifurcation. Without disclosed retention agreements, the base rate (~57%) and spin mechanics still keep probability near-coin-flip, but the confirmed positive indicators nudge it below 50%.

CFO confirmed on earnings call — eliminates near-term departure as imminent riskH2 2026 spin-off creates natural CFO transition point requiring two executive rolesHistorical 4-CFO-in-7-years base rate remains the strongest prior for this question
sonnetRun 2
43%

CFO Carlet's active participation in Q4 earnings reduces the probability of a near-term surprise departure — a CFO preparing to leave typically becomes less visible, not more. The financial turnaround (leverage from 5.5x feared to 3.9x actual, EBITDA record) removes the crisis scenario that often precipitates CFO changes. Against this, the spin-off creates a structural question: does Carlet lead RemainCo or SpinCo post-separation, and does the other entity require a search? This structural dynamic is the primary remaining risk, and it applies to the back half of the year. On balance, this is a modest downward revision from 52% to approximately 43%.

Active earnings call participation signals CFO not preparing for imminent departureCorrected financials (OCF $453M, no impairment) remove crisis-driven departure catalystSeparation bifurcation (RemainCo + SpinCo each need CFO) is primary H2 2026 risk
sonnetRun 3
46%

The delta provides positive signals on near-term retention (CFO present, strong results) but structural risks remain elevated for the full-year horizon. The separation mechanics are the key variable: a spin expected H2 2026 means the leadership structure for two independent companies must be resolved, potentially triggering a CFO announcement even if Carlet leads one entity. The Form 4 late filing concern has not been directly addressed, and no retention bonuses or multi-year equity grants have been disclosed. The DEF14A 2026 will be the key monitoring event. Probability moves to 46% — slightly below prior as the near-term risk recedes but the structural risk holds.

DEF14A 2026 still pending — retention agreements and equity grants not yet visibleSpin-off leadership structure unresolved: which entity does Carlet lead post-separation?Form 4 compliance issue unaddressed — governance concern persists in the background
haikuRun 1
42%

CFO Carlet participated in Q4 earnings and financial results were strong, both reducing the near-term departure probability. The historical base rate (4 CFOs in 7 years) suggests high structural turnover, but the most recent data point — Carlet remaining through strong results — is a negative indicator for departure. The spin-off is a genuine risk but may result in Carlet leading one of the entities rather than departing entirely, which would resolve the market NO. Probability revised to 42%.

Most recent data point (Q4 call participation) is a direct negative departure signalRecord EBITDA performance reduces voluntary and involuntary CFO departure pressureSpin-off may result in Carlet leading one entity rather than a departure event
haikuRun 2
40%

Strong Q4 results and confirmed CFO presence reduce departure probability meaningfully. The corrected leverage (3.9x, not 5.5x) removes the financial distress narrative that could have driven a board-mandated change. While the historical base rate is high, the current CFO appears to be executing well through synergy delivery (Snap One 18 months ahead) and a clean Q4 close. The separation remains a risk but also an opportunity — a CFO who has managed a complex spin could be more valuable and more likely to be retained as a key architect. Probability at 40%.

Snap One synergies 18 months ahead of schedule — CFO demonstrating execution, reducing termination riskCorrected 3.9x leverage removes financial distress narrative entirelySpin architect role may incentivize CFO retention rather than trigger departure
haikuRun 3
44%

The overall update is moderately positive for CFO retention: record results, confirmed presence, corrected leverage. However, the question resolves YES on any departure through December 31, 2026 — a 10-month window still remains. The historical departure pattern (4 CFOs, 4 CAOs in 7 years) applied to the remainder of 2026 produces a ~44% unconditional probability even without the spin-off factor. Adding the spin-off complexity as a mild upward factor and the confirmed Q4 retention as a downward factor, the estimate lands at 44%.

10-month remaining resolution window still substantial — base rate applies to full periodNo retention agreements disclosed means departure is structurally unconstrainedQ4 confirmation provides 3 months of concrete data but does not resolve full-year question

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if REZI announces via 8-K or press release that the CFO (Chief Financial Officer) or CAO (Chief Accounting Officer) is departing, retiring, or being replaced during 2026. Resolves NO if both remain in position through December 31, 2026.

Resolution Source

REZI 8-K filings (Item 5.02 - Departure of Directors or Certain Officers)

Source Trigger

Fifth CFO or CAO departure

fugazi-filterGOVERNANCE_ALIGNMENTHIGH
View REZI Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis