Back to Forecasting
SNOWActive

Will Snowflake's cloud infrastructure costs remain above 70% of product COGS for 2+ consecutive quarters by H1 FY2027?

Resolves June 30, 2026(124d)
IG: 0.64

Current Prediction

68%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement94%
Predictions3 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 25, 2026

Prediction History

Initial
60%
Feb 7
+8pp
Current
68%
Feb 25
Q4 FY2026 earnings — gross margin compression guided, AI confirmed margin-dilutive

Moved from 60% to 68%. FY2027 product gross margin guided down to 75% from 75.8%, CFO confirmed AI workloads are margin-dilutive. Converted prior uncertainty into confirmed structural direction.

Why This Question Matters

Cloud infrastructure COGS spiking from 64% to 72% in Q3 FY2026 is the highest-impact data gap across all lenses — it determines whether AI workloads are structurally margin-dilutive. If COGS sustains above 70% for two consecutive quarters, it confirms AI scaling compresses gross margins and undermines the margin expansion thesis embedded in valuation. If COGS reverts below 68%, the spike was likely a one-time infrastructure buildout, and the path to profitability improvement remains viable.

NARRATIVE_REALITY_GAPREVENUE_DURABILITY

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 66%72%Aggregate: 68%
Individual Predictions(3 runs)
opusRun 1
72%

Q4 FY2026 earnings provided direct evidence bearing on this market. FY2026 product gross margin came in at 75.8%, meaning product COGS was 24.2% of product revenue. Management guided FY2027 product gross margin DOWN to 75%, explicitly confirming margin compression. This is the first time in the analysis that management has guided gross margins lower rather than flat-to-higher. The CFO directly stated 'margin profile for AI products aren't as high as core business,' confirming the mechanism: AI workloads are structurally margin-dilutive. The 75% FY2027 guide implies product COGS of 25% of revenue — but this is at the product level, not the cloud infrastructure level specifically. However, the direction is unambiguous: margins are compressing, and AI is the stated driver. The question is whether cloud infrastructure specifically stays above 70% of product COGS. Given Q3 FY2026 was at 72%, and the gross margin compression guidance implies COGS pressure continues, the most likely path is persistence above 70%. The CFO's comment about 'finding efficiencies in core business' to offset AI margin dilution suggests the offset mechanism is in non-cloud cost lines (personnel, overhead), not in cloud infrastructure costs themselves. The 200-person RIF supports this — headcount reduction is a non-cloud cost efficiency. Cloud infrastructure costs themselves remain elevated due to AI GPU demand. Calibration note: applying the lesson from the guidance market, I resist excessive bearishness but in this case the direct evidence (margin compression guidance, CFO confirmation of AI margin dilution) is unambiguous and points HIGHER.

FY2027 gross margin guided DOWN to 75% from 75.8% — first downward margin guidanceCFO confirmed 'AI products margin profile not as high as core business' — direct evidence of structural dilutionEfficiency offsets are in headcount (RIF) not cloud infrastructure — cloud costs remain elevated
sonnetRun 1
68%

Updating from the prior 60% aggregate based on Q4 FY2026 earnings. The prior prediction was made with genuine uncertainty — committee said single-quarter COGS spike was 'insufficient to conclude structural.' Q4 earnings substantially resolved this uncertainty in the direction of persistence. Three key developments: (1) FY2026 product gross margin was 75.8%, confirming that the Q3 COGS spike persisted through Q4. If cloud infrastructure COGS had reverted below 70% in Q4, we'd expect full-year product GM above 76%. The 75.8% figure is consistent with cloud infrastructure COGS remaining in the 70-72% range. (2) Management guided FY2027 product gross margin DOWN to 75%, explicitly projecting further compression. This is forward-looking confirmation that the cost pressure continues. (3) CFO directly attributed margin dilution to AI workloads — 'margin profile for AI products aren't as high as core business.' This converts the prior 'unresolvable uncertainty' into a confirmed mechanism. The question requires BOTH Q4 FY2026 AND Q1 FY2027 to be above 70%. Q4 data appears likely to show persistence based on the full-year GM figure. Q1 FY2027 guidance at 75% GM implies continued compression. The 'efficiency in core business' offset (including the 200-person RIF) could marginally improve cloud infrastructure ratios, but the structural AI margin dilution is now confirmed. Moving probability from 60% to 68%, reflecting the conversion of uncertainty into confirmed direction.

FY2026 product GM 75.8% consistent with cloud COGS remaining in 70-72% range through Q4FY2027 GM guided DOWN to 75% — forward confirmation of sustained margin compressionCFO confirmed AI margin dilution mechanism — converts uncertainty into confirmed direction
haikuRun 1
66%

Strong directional update from Q4 earnings. Prior prediction was 60% based on single-quarter uncertainty. New evidence resolves much of that uncertainty: FY2026 product GM at 75.8% (implying Q4 COGS stayed elevated), FY2027 GM guided down to 75% (margin compression continues), and CFO confirmed AI is margin-dilutive. The 200-person RIF and headcount discipline show management finding efficiencies, but these are personnel costs, not cloud infrastructure. Cloud commitments are non-cancelable and escalating. The 70% threshold needs to hold for 2 consecutive quarters (Q4 FY2026 + Q1 FY2027). Q4 data appears likely above 70% based on full-year figures. Q1 guidance suggests continued pressure. Remaining risk to YES: management could find cloud-specific efficiencies (renegotiated contracts, workload optimization) that bring infrastructure costs just below 70% even as overall margins compress. This is possible but unlikely given the confirmed structural mechanism. Moving from 60% to 66%.

FY2026 GM 75.8% implies Q4 cloud COGS stayed elevated (consistent with >70%)FY2027 GM guided 75% confirms ongoing compression — not one-quarter anomalyEfficiency gains from RIF target personnel costs, not cloud infrastructure

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if cloud infrastructure costs as a percentage of product cost of revenue remain at or above 70.0% for two or more consecutive quarters, using data from Q4 FY2026 (ending January 31, 2026) and Q1 FY2027 (ending April 30, 2026). Calculated from 10-Q/10-K filings using the 'Third-party cloud infrastructure' line item divided by 'Product' cost of revenue. Resolves NO if either Q4 FY2026 or Q1 FY2027 shows cloud infrastructure below 70.0% of product COGS, breaking the consecutive quarter requirement.

Resolution Source

Snowflake 10-K FY2026 (Q4 data) and 10-Q Q1 FY2027 cost of revenue disclosures. Q4 FY2026 10-K expected ~March-April 2026; Q1 FY2027 10-Q expected ~June 2026.

Source Trigger

Cloud infra COGS sustains above 70-75% for 2+ quarters

myth-meterNARRATIVE_REALITY_GAPHIGH
View SNOW Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis