Archived research. Equity forecasting is part of the Runchey Research archive (methodology era 1) and is no longer actively updated. Everything remains published at its original URL. Browse the archive

Back to Forecasting
TJXActive

Will TJX report FY27 adjusted EPS above the high end of initial guidance ($5.02)?

Resolves March 15, 2027(230d)
IG: 0.60

Current Prediction

58%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement94%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedMarch 8, 2026

Why This Question Matters

EPS guidance beat is the ultimate scorecard for the under-promise/over-deliver thesis. In FY26, TJX beat initial guidance midpoint by ~10%. The Atomic Auditor classified OPERATIONAL_EXECUTION as EXCEEDING based on this E3 pattern but flagged FY27 as the transition test. At 31x P/E, the market requires 8-10% EPS growth but TJX guided only 4-6%. Beating the high end ($5.02) would sustain the quality premium. Missing it would downgrade EXCEEDING toward MEETING and compress the multiple.

OPERATIONAL_EXECUTIONEXPECTATIONS_PRICED

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 54%63%Aggregate: 58%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
62%

FY26 beat initial midpoint by ~10% ($4.87 vs $4.38 midpoint). Applying even a conservative 5% beat above the FY27 midpoint ($4.975) yields $5.22, comfortably above $5.02. The $2.50-$2.75B buyback authorization provides 2-3% mechanical EPS accretion. However, guided growth deceleration from 14% to 4-6% signals management expects a harder operating environment. The E3-verified under-promise pattern is the strongest single signal, and the full-year time horizon provides multiple quarters for guidance raises.

E3-verified 10% beat pattern in FY26Buyback mechanical lift of 2-3%Full-year horizon allows multiple guidance raises
opusRun 2
58%

The adjusted vs. reported basis is critical. FY26 adjusted EPS was $4.73, not $4.87 reported. FY27 guidance of $4.93-$5.02 is on adjusted basis (+4-6%). In FY26, adjusted EPS beat the initial high end ($4.43) by 6.8%. Applying 6.8% to $5.02 yields $5.36, above threshold. But the deceleration in guided growth is genuine -- management went from guiding 14% growth to 4-6%, the widest step-down in recent history. SG&A at 20.1% creates a margin ceiling that could cap earnings leverage even if revenue beats.

FY26 adjusted beat initial high end by 6.8%Guided growth step-down from 14% to 4-6% is significantSG&A trending to 20.1% may cap earnings leverage
opusRun 3
55%

Risk factors deserve more weight than the base case suggests. The Black Swan Beacon identifies a 15-25% 'Benign Neglect Cascade' where a Q1 miss breaks the under-promise pattern and compresses the multiple 25-35%. HomeGoods margin drag (420bps below Marmaxx) is increasingly material as expansion accelerates. Insider activity is exclusively selling (16 sells, 0 buys over 5 years) -- while routine, it provides zero positive confirmation. The question asks about beating the HIGH END of guidance, not the midpoint, which is a higher bar. Resolution is 12 months out, introducing macroeconomic and tariff uncertainty.

15-25% Benign Neglect Cascade risk from Black Swan BeaconHomeGoods margin drag increasingly materialExclusively insider selling provides no positive confirmation
sonnetRun 1
60%

TJX systematically sandbagged FY26 guidance with three consecutive raises, delivering $4.87 vs $4.34-$4.43 initial guide. The pattern is E3-verified with 2/2 committee agreement. Buybacks at $2.50-$2.75B provide 2-3% mechanical EPS lift annually. Even if organic earnings growth merely matches the 4-6% guide, buybacks push total EPS growth to 6-9% -- potentially clearing $5.02. The 4-lens structural confirmation (DOMINANT moat, PROVEN economics, DURABLE revenue, STABLE balance sheet) supports sustained execution.

Three consecutive FY26 guidance raises -- systematic conservatismBuyback mechanical lift bridges gap between guided and required growth4-lens structural quality confirmation
sonnetRun 2
57%

The key tension is between established pattern and the specific threshold. $5.02 is the HIGH END of initial guidance, not the midpoint. In FY26, TJX beat the initial HIGH END by $0.44 on reported basis ($4.87 vs $4.43). On adjusted basis, $4.73 vs $4.43 = $0.30 beat of high end, or 6.8%. A 6.8% beat of $5.02 = $5.36. But the deceleration from 14% to 4-6% guided growth and the Myth Meter's DEMANDING expectation classification at 31x P/E suggest the easy execution gains may be behind TJX. The 12-month horizon introduces meaningful macro uncertainty including tariff policy shifts.

FY26 beat HIGH END by 6.8% on adjusted basisDEMANDING expectations at 31x P/E12-month horizon introduces macro/tariff uncertainty
sonnetRun 3
54%

The insider selling pattern warrants consideration -- CEO Herrman sold 30,000 shares at $160.95 on March 2, 2026, plus 54,363 in November 2025 and 18,000 in March 2025. All discretionary, no 10b5-1 plans. While he retains $77M in shares (substantial skin in the game), zero insider buying over 5 years provides no positive confirmation of management's confidence in beating their own guidance. The buyback program is the strongest mechanical support for EPS, but SG&A creep and HomeGoods dilution create margin headwinds that could partially offset revenue strength.

Zero insider buying over 5 years -- no positive confirmationBuyback program strongest mechanical EPS supportSG&A creep and HomeGoods margin dilution create headwinds
haikuRun 1
63%

FY26 beat pattern is dominant signal: 10% above initial midpoint, three consecutive raises, E3-verified. Buybacks add 2-3% mechanical lift. DOMINANT moat and PROVEN economics support continued execution. Management described FY26 as 'exceeding expectations on every measure' -- conservative guidance framing is entrenched. Beating $5.02 requires modest continuation of established pattern.

E3-verified 10% beat pattern2-3% mechanical buyback liftDOMINANT moat supports execution continuity
haikuRun 2
55%

Guided growth deceleration from 14% to 4-6% is meaningful and not just conservatism -- it reflects a higher base and accumulating headwinds. SG&A at 20.1% and HomeGoods margin drag (420bps below Marmaxx) limit earnings leverage. But $5.02 is only the high end of a conservative guide, and the buyback floor makes an outright miss unlikely.

Guided growth deceleration reflects real headwindsSG&A and HomeGoods margin pressureBuyback floor limits downside
haikuRun 3
58%

Management's conservative guidance pattern is well-established and the $2.50-$2.75B buyback provides structural EPS support. The 4-lens quality confirmation (DOMINANT, PROVEN, DURABLE, STABLE) makes execution failure unlikely. Balancing pattern continuation against deceleration headwinds, probability favors a beat of the conservative high end.

Conservative guidance pattern well-establishedBuyback provides structural EPS floor4-lens quality confirmation reduces execution risk

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if TJX reports FY27 full-year adjusted diluted EPS above $5.02 in its Q4 FY27 earnings release. Resolves NO if FY27 adjusted EPS is $5.02 or below.

Resolution Source

TJX Q4 FY27 earnings press release (expected February 2027)

Source Trigger

FY27 guidance miss (EPS below $4.93 or comps below +2%) — management stops raising guidance or begins cutting

atomic-auditorOPERATIONAL_EXECUTIONHIGH
View TJX Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis