Back to Forecasting
XYZActive

Will Block record an Afterpay-related goodwill impairment charge in FY2025 or FY2026?

Resolves March 31, 2027(398d)
IG: 0.64

Current Prediction

30%
Likely No
Model Agreement90%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 20, 2026

Why This Question Matters

Afterpay was acquired for ~$29B in stock (Jan 2022) with zero discussion of impairment testing on any earnings call. The meta-synthesis identified this as reinforcement R5 across 3 lenses. The Black Swan Beacon's Credit Cycle Unmasking scenario explicitly includes Afterpay impairment as a cascade step. An impairment charge would validate the value destruction narrative, shift ACCOUNTING_INTEGRITY from CONCERNING toward ALARMING, and narrow the NARRATIVE_REALITY_GAP toward ALIGNED. No impairment through FY2026 would suggest the Afterpay integration is retaining value within Cash App Card, though the silence on testing assumptions would remain a data gap.

ACCOUNTING_INTEGRITYNARRATIVE_REALITY_GAPREVENUE_DURABILITY

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 22%37%Aggregate: 30%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
32%

The $29B Afterpay acquisition occurred at peak fintech valuations (Jan 2022) in a vastly different rate environment. Intangible amortization has reduced carrying value below $29B, providing some cushion. However, BNPL originations are growing at $3B annualized with +17-18% CC GMV growth, suggesting the business unit generates real and growing revenue. The silence on impairment testing across five consecutive earnings calls is concerning but not dispositive -- it could indicate comfort with headroom rather than concealment. Annual impairment testing in FY2025 10-K is the next major data point. The two-year resolution window provides multiple testing cycles but operational momentum argues against near-term impairment.

$29B acquisition at peak valuations with carrying value reduced by amortizationBNPL originations $3B annualized and growing -- business unit has real valueZero impairment discussion across 5 earnings calls is a transparency gap
opusRun 2
28%

The resolution window spans two annual impairment testing cycles (FY2025 and FY2026 10-Ks), which mechanically increases probability versus a single-year question. However, the committee resolved that carrying value is likely lower than $29B after intangible amortization, providing cushion. If Block uses DCF for fair value, the higher discount rate environment since 2022 reduces fair value, but the integrated Cash App Card unit generates strong cash flows with GP accelerating and guidance raised. The Black Swan Beacon's 15-25% single-year estimate is a reasonable anchor; over two years the cumulative probability is modestly higher but offset by positive operational trends.

Two annual impairment test cycles in resolution windowCarrying value reduced by intangible amortization -- cushion existsBlack Swan Beacon 15-25% single-year estimate as base rate anchor
opusRun 3
35%

Block's pattern of divesting or deemphasizing prior acquisitions (TBD winding down, TIDAL scaling back) is a relevant base rate for how this management team handles acquisitions that underperform strategic expectations. The integration into Cash App Card obscures standalone Afterpay metrics, which could either protect the reporting unit (larger unit harder to impair) or mask deterioration. The committee flagged this at MEDIUM confidence with E2 evidence across 3 lenses -- a genuine cross-lens concern. Macro credit cycle risk over the two-year window could trigger BNPL loss spikes that force impairment testing failure. Slightly above the Black Swan Beacon midpoint given the extended resolution window.

Block's pattern of divesting/deemphasizing acquisitions (TBD, TIDAL)Integration into Cash App Card obscures standalone performance metricsTwo-year resolution window captures potential credit cycle deterioration
sonnetRun 1
33%

The math is structurally unfavorable for Block over a two-year window: $29B purchase price at peak valuations, compressed fintech multiples, shifted BNPL competitive dynamics (Apple Pay Later, regulatory scrutiny). But the operational data argues against imminent impairment -- $3B annualized originations growing rapidly, and the committee resolved that carrying value is likely below $29B after amortization. The zero discussion of impairment testing is the most concerning signal -- most companies with large acquisitions at least reference their annual testing methodology. Ernst & Young as long-standing auditor provides some assurance that testing is conducted properly even if not discussed publicly.

$29B at peak valuations with compressed fintech multiples since 2022Zero impairment testing discussion is most concerning signalOperational metrics ($3B originations, growing GMV) argue against imminent write-down
sonnetRun 2
25%

ASC 350 requires fair value below carrying value to trigger impairment, not merely fair value below purchase price. The integration into Cash App Card likely makes the reporting unit larger and healthier -- a larger reporting unit with strong aggregate cash flows is harder to impair even if the acquired component underperformed expectations. Afterpay's BNPL originations are ramping, not declining. Among large tech acquisitions at peak 2021-2022 valuations, impairments have occurred primarily where the acquired business deteriorated (not merely where multiples compressed). Block's GP is accelerating and guidance is being raised, suggesting the integrated unit is healthy.

ASC 350 tests fair value vs carrying value -- not vs purchase priceIntegration into larger Cash App Card unit makes impairment mechanically harderAcquired business is growing, not deteriorating -- key distinction for impairment testing
sonnetRun 3
37%

The Black Swan Beacon estimated 15-25% probability of impairment exceeding $10B for any single year. Over a two-year resolution window covering two annual impairment tests, the cumulative probability is meaningfully higher -- roughly 1 minus (1-0.20)^2 = 0.36 using the midpoint. This aligns with the cross-lens reinforcement across Fugazi Filter, Gravy Gauge, and Myth Meter at MEDIUM confidence. The silence on testing assumptions across five consecutive calls is more suspicious than reassuring. Ernst & Young's continued engagement doesn't preclude a future impairment -- auditors often sign off on aggressive assumptions until they don't.

Two-year window roughly doubles single-year Black Swan probability (~20% -> ~36%)Cross-lens reinforcement R5 across 3 lenses at MEDIUM confidenceManagement silence on testing assumptions is more suspicious than reassuring
haikuRun 1
30%

$29B acquisition at peak valuations with zero impairment discussion is a genuine transparency gap flagged across 3 lenses. However, BNPL originations are growing at $3B annualized and carrying value is reduced by amortization. Two annual tests in resolution window push probability above single-year Black Swan estimate of 15-25%. Balanced at 0.30.

$29B at peak valuations + zero impairment discussionBNPL $3B originations growing -- business has real valueTwo annual impairment tests in resolution window
haikuRun 2
22%

Integration into Cash App Card makes the reporting unit larger and harder to impair under ASC 350. Operational metrics are positive: BNPL originations growing, GP accelerating, guidance raised. Committee resolved as 'noteworthy gap' not 'imminent risk.' Management appears to have headroom based on absence of auditor emphasis-of-matter or reporting unit restructuring signals.

Integration into larger unit mechanically harder to impairCommittee resolved as noteworthy gap, not imminent riskPositive operational metrics argue against near-term write-down
haikuRun 3
28%

Two-year window captures potential credit cycle deterioration that could spike BNPL losses per Black Swan Beacon scenario. Block's pattern of divesting acquisitions (TBD, TIDAL) suggests willingness to write down when strategic priority shifts. But management raised guidance and GP is accelerating -- current trajectory does not suggest imminent impairment.

Two-year window captures credit cycle riskBlock's acquisition divestiture pattern (TBD, TIDAL)Current operational trajectory is positive

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Block records a goodwill impairment charge of any amount related to the Afterpay reporting unit (or successor reporting unit) in either the FY2025 10-K or any quarterly filing through FY2026. Resolves NO if no Afterpay-related goodwill impairment is recorded through the FY2026 10-K filing.

Resolution Source

Block FY2025 10-K and FY2026 quarterly/annual filings on SEC EDGAR; goodwill impairment disclosures in notes to financial statements

Source Trigger

Afterpay goodwill impairment charge

fugazi-filterACCOUNTING_INTEGRITYMEDIUM
View XYZ Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis