Back to Forecasting
XYZActive

Will Block report Q4 2025 gross profit growth of 15% or higher YoY?

Resolves March 15, 2026(17d)
IG: 0.80

Current Prediction

86%
Likely Yes
Model Agreement94%
Predictions9 runs
Last UpdatedFebruary 19, 2026

Why This Question Matters

GP trajectory is the central test of the narrative-reality gap. The Myth Meter classified the gap as DISCONNECTED because GP accelerated from +9% to +18% YoY through 2025 while the stock declined >20%. If Q4 sustains 15%+ growth, it extends the acceleration pattern through a 4th quarter and strengthens the case that the market is materially mispricing Block's operational momentum. If growth decelerates below 15%, it would narrow the narrative gap and suggest the market's skepticism about growth sustainability may be warranted, potentially shifting NARRATIVE_REALITY_GAP toward ALIGNED.

NARRATIVE_REALITY_GAPREVENUE_DURABILITYEXPECTATIONS_PRICED

Prediction Distribution

0%25%50%75%100%
opus
sonnet
haiku
Range: 82%91%Aggregate: 86%
Individual Predictions(9 runs)
opusRun 1
88%

Management guided Q4 GP to $2.755B (+19% YoY), 4pp above the 15% threshold. They have raised guidance 3 consecutive quarters and never missed in FY2025. The GP acceleration pattern (+9% to +14% to +18%) is well-established, and Cash App GP grew +24% in Q3. For 15% to be missed, Block would need to undershoot guidance by ~$92M, which would be unprecedented in the current trajectory. Primary risk is lending quality deterioration, but Q3 showed no credit stress signals.

Management guides 19% vs 15% threshold — 4pp bufferGuidance raised 3 consecutive quarters, never missed in FY2025Cash App GP +24% in Q3 provides strong Q4 momentum
opusRun 2
85%

To miss 15%, Block would need to undershoot its own Q4 GP guide by ~$92M. Management has not missed guidance this year and the acceleration in Cash App GP (10% to 16% to 24%) provides strong momentum. Lending risk from +134% origination growth is the most credible downside, but credit deterioration sufficient to cause a 4pp miss would require a severe macro shock between Q3 close and Q4 close. Q4 seasonal dynamics (holiday spending) typically favor payment volumes.

~$92M buffer between threshold and guidanceCash App GP acceleration (10% to 16% to 24%) continues into Q4Lending shock would need to be severe to close 4pp gap
opusRun 3
82%

Specific math: Q4 2024 GP ~$2.31B implied. For 15% growth, Q4 2025 needs ~$2.66B vs management guide of $2.755B — a ~$95M buffer (~3.5% of quarterly GP). The strongest downside is a lending shock: at ~20-25% GP contribution with +134% growth, lending contributes ~$550-690M quarterly GP. A 15% shock to lending GP (~$85-100M) could eat the entire buffer. But no credit deterioration evidence exists in Q3 data. The Moat Mapper's NARROWING position is more relevant to multi-year outlook than single-quarter delivery.

$95M buffer represents ~3.5% of quarterly GPLending shock of ~15% would be needed to breach thresholdNo credit deterioration evidence in most recent data
sonnetRun 1
91%

This is near-certain. Management guided 19% GP growth for Q4 — 4pp above threshold — and has beaten or raised guidance every quarter in FY2025. The acceleration from +9% to +18% through Q1-Q3 shows improving execution. Cash App GP at +24% growth shows no signs of slowing. The only miss scenario requires a severe credit event affecting the lending book between October-December 2025, but Q3 earnings showed no stress signals. The 4pp buffer between threshold and guidance is enormous.

Management guides 19% — 4pp above 15% thresholdGuidance beaten or raised every quarter in FY2025Cash App GP +24% growth is the main engine with no deceleration
sonnetRun 2
87%

Management has proven reliable on guidance — raised 3 times, never missed. Guiding to 19% with threshold at 15% creates substantial margin of safety. GP acceleration is driven by Cash App monetization deepening (+24% GP growth in Q3) and lending expansion (+134% originations). Square GP at +9% still contributing positively. Processing partner cost headwind already embedded in guidance. For NO, you'd need an unexpected Q4 shock — none evident in data. Moat Mapper's NARROWING position affects long-term trajectory, not immediate Q4.

Guidance reliability — raised 3x, never missed in FY2025Cash App monetization deepening drives accelerationProcessing cost headwind already baked into guidance
sonnetRun 3
84%

Asymmetric evidence structure: all positive indicators (acceleration trend, raised guidance, Cash App momentum, lending growth) point to YES. The NO case requires an unlikely shock scenario. Management's Q4 guide of $2.755B (+19%) implies visibility into early Q4 trends when guidance was issued in November. Credit risk from rapid lending growth is the most credible downside, but even significant deterioration would need to wipe ~$95M GP to breach 15%, and that would likely have been flagged in subsequent disclosures.

Asymmetric evidence — all indicators favor YESQ4 guide issued with early Q4 visibility in NovemberCredit deterioration of ~$95M needed with no evidence of stress
haikuRun 1
89%

Management guides 19%, threshold is 15%. They raised guidance 3x in FY2025 and never missed. GP acceleration from +9% to +18% is clear. Cash App GP +24% provides strong Q4 momentum. 4pp buffer between guide and threshold makes this highly likely to resolve YES.

4pp buffer between guide (19%) and threshold (15%)GP acceleration pattern sustained through Q1-Q3Cash App GP +24% provides strong forward momentum
haikuRun 2
86%

The 15% threshold is well below management's 19% guide. GP growth has accelerated all year with Cash App at +24% as the main driver. Lending expansion (+134%) supports continued growth. Only a major unexpected shock could cause a miss of this magnitude. Processing cost headwinds already reflected in guidance.

15% threshold well below 19% guidanceCash App GP +24% growth is primary driverLending +134% supports growth but carries credit risk
haikuRun 3
83%

Acceleration pattern (+9% to +18%) and management guidance (+19% for Q4) strongly favor YES. Lending risk is real but would need to be severe to close a 4pp gap. No credit stress visible in latest data. Seasonal Q4 dynamics support payment volumes. Slightly lower probability to account for tail risk of macro shock or lending quality surprise.

Acceleration pattern strongly established through 2025Lending risk is credible but needs to be severeQ4 seasonal dynamics favor payment volumes

Resolution Criteria

Resolves YES if Block's Q4 2025 earnings report shows gross profit growth of 15.0% or higher year-over-year compared to Q4 2024 gross profit. Resolves NO if gross profit growth is below 15.0% YoY. Uses the gross profit figure reported in Block's Q4 2025 earnings release or 10-K.

Resolution Source

Block Q4 2025 earnings release or FY2025 10-K filing (SEC EDGAR)

Source Trigger

Q4 2025 earnings (Feb 26, 2026) -- GP growth trajectory and lending metrics

myth-meterNARRATIVE_REALITY_GAPHIGH
View XYZ Analysis

Full multi-lens equity analysis